stupid name Ideas for ruby and sapphire remakes.

Vaati227 said:
silly tyeforce. ruining fun topics with your words.
but I can prove that if there are remakes of ruby and saphire that there will not be remakes of FR/LG in a mere 4 words.

" It would be stupid."
The same four words can apply to Ruby and Sapphire remakes.
 
Tyeforce said:
Vaati227 said:
silly tyeforce. ruining fun topics with your words.
but I can prove that if there are remakes of ruby and saphire that there will not be remakes of FR/LG in a mere 4 words.

" It would be stupid."
The same four words can apply to Ruby and Sapphire remakes.
haters gonna hate.
 
Tyeforce said:
beehdaubs said:
Tyeforce said:
Vaati227 said:
Tyeforce said:
There won't be Ruby and Sapphire remakes. If they remade them, then they'd have to re-remake Red and Green. And then they'd have to remake Diamond and Pearl and re-remake Gold and Silver. It'd be an endless cycle of remakes, and nobody wants that. The reason why the Generation I and II games were remade is because they aren't compatible with Generation III and above games, because Generation III brought a complete renovation of the game mechanics. So, to make all the games compatible, they remade the first two generations. Since everything's compatible with each other now, there's no need for more remakes. It's all new from here on out.
theres absolutely no reason that they would have to remake the remakes.

your post is voided by logic.
Ah, but there is. If they remade Ruby and Sapphire but didn't remake FireRed and LeafGreen, then (Fire)Red and (Leaf)Green would be left as the odd ones out. And if that doesn't seem like a valid reason for you, here's another: There's no reason to remake them. The remaking of Red & Green and Gold & Silver had a good reason behind it; because the original games are no longer compatible with current generations. So, to make all of the games compatible, the older ones needed to be remade. Ever since Generation III, all main series Pok
 
Vaati227 said:
Tyeforce said:
Vaati227 said:
silly tyeforce. ruining fun topics with your words.
but I can prove that if there are remakes of ruby and saphire that there will not be remakes of FR/LG in a mere 4 words.

" It would be stupid."
The same four words can apply to Ruby and Sapphire remakes.
haters gonna hate.
I don't hate Ruby and Sapphire at all. There's just no need for remakes. Wouldn't you rather have Game Freak putting their effort into brand new Pok
 
you're just arguing because you want to.
look at the topic title will ya.

It was never meant to be serious. Barely anything I do ever is.
if you want to argue about a topic that YOU brought up, do it elsewhere.

the rest of you who have been like "wut" go about your business.
 
Vaati227 said:
you're just arguing because you want to.
look at the topic title will ya.

It was never meant to be serious. Barely anything I do ever is.
if you want to argue about a topic that YOU brought up, do it elsewhere.

the rest of you who have been like "wut" go about your business.
It's not off topic. By the title, you're suggesting that you believe that there will be Ruby and Sapphire remakes, and I'm just expressing my opinion on the matter, and stating the facts. Even if the thread isn't serious, it's still relevant to the topic. And if wouldn't have said anything, then the thread would've just died with all "wat" comments, anyway, so what's the big deal?
 
Tyeforce said:
Vaati227 said:
you're just arguing because you want to.
look at the topic title will ya.

It was never meant to be serious. Barely anything I do ever is.
if you want to argue about a topic that YOU brought up, do it elsewhere.

the rest of you who have been like "wut" go about your business.
It's not off topic. By the title, you're suggesting that you believe that there will be Ruby and Sapphire remakes, and I'm just expressing my opinion on the matter, and stating the facts. Even if the thread isn't serious, it's still relevant to the topic. And if wouldn't have said anything, then the thread would've just died with all "wat" comments, anyway, so what's the big deal?
Technically, it is off topic since the topic is about Name Ideas. If it was for discussion on the idea, the title would have been something like: Do you think there should be Ruby/Sapphire remakes?

Just take the arguing to PM, not the thread. I'd rather see discussion of the topic than some stupid little argument.

Back on topic, then: I'm going to go with beehdaubs idea. It seems more likely to me.
 
Sarc said:
Tyeforce said:
Vaati227 said:
you're just arguing because you want to.
look at the topic title will ya.

It was never meant to be serious. Barely anything I do ever is.
if you want to argue about a topic that YOU brought up, do it elsewhere.

the rest of you who have been like "wut" go about your business.
It's not off topic. By the title, you're suggesting that you believe that there will be Ruby and Sapphire remakes, and I'm just expressing my opinion on the matter, and stating the facts. Even if the thread isn't serious, it's still relevant to the topic. And if wouldn't have said anything, then the thread would've just died with all "wat" comments, anyway, so what's the big deal?
Technically, it is off topic since the topic is about Name Ideas. If it was for discussion on the idea, the title would have been something like: Do you think there should be Ruby/Sapphire remakes?

Just take the arguing to PM, not the thread. I'd rather see discussion of the topic than some stupid little argument.

Back on topic, then: I'm going to go with beehdaubs idea. It seems more likely to me.
Technically, the "How far are you in Pok
 
since you all love throwing away your money why dont they just make remakes of heart gold and soul silver? with BETTER graphics!
 
VantagE said:
Hey Tye, shut up and think of stupid names, not start stupid arguments...
What's the point in thinking of names for games that won't be made? =p

Anyway, in the very, very, very unlikely chance that they are made for some strange reason, I'd suspect EarthRuby and SeaSapphire.
 
Back
Top