stupid name Ideas for ruby and sapphire remakes.

[Darkwind]

yep.

so how about TwistRuby and ShoutSapphire? :B

 

[Gnome]

ShinyRuby And SparklSapphire

since Ruby is the superior.

 

[beehdaubs]

Red Ruby and Blue Sapphire. Just you wait. Nintendo will do it.

 

[The Sign Painter]

With the DS3 coming out, they will need to be made.

 

[Jas0n]

Red Ruby and Blue Sapphire. Just you wait. Nintendo will do it.

I facepalmed because it'll probably come true.

 

[Rawburt]

I see MagmaRuby and AquaSapphire happening.

 

[random guy]

If they do remake them it won't be untill after Gen.V and S/R/E are still pretty new to the point where they can connect to Gen.IV.

 

[Garrett x50 cal]

Rad Ruby!!!
Sick Sapphire!!!!

 

[Caleb]

Max and Ruby
Shire Sapphire

 

[-Aaron]

LMFAOOOOOOOOOOO Max and Ruby.

Anyway, I'll go with what Beehdaubs said.

 

[Kyle]

I see MagmaRuby and AquaSapphire happening.

Most believable IMO.
Fits with the game the best.

 

[Gnome]

If they do remake them it won't be untill after Gen.V and S/R/E are still pretty new to the point where they can connect to Gen.IV.

6 years old.

 

[random guy]

If they do remake them it won't be untill after Gen.V and S/R/E are still pretty new to the point where they can connect to Gen.IV.

6 years old.

Sorry I didn't know they were talking about it in 2004 my bad.

 

[Tyeforce]

There won't be Ruby and Sapphire remakes. If they remade them, then they'd have to re-remake Red and Green. And then they'd have to remake Diamond and Pearl and re-remake Gold and Silver. It'd be an endless cycle of remakes, and nobody wants that. The reason why the Generation I and II games were remade is because they aren't compatible with Generation III and above games, because Generation III brought a complete renovation of the game mechanics. So, to make all the games compatible, they remade the first two generations. Since everything's compatible with each other now, there's no need for more remakes. It's all new from here on out.

 

[Darkwind]

There won't be Ruby and Sapphire remakes. If they remade them, then they'd have to re-remake Red and Green. And then they'd have to remake Diamond and Pearl and re-remake Gold and Silver. It'd be an endless cycle of remakes, and nobody wants that. The reason why the Generation I and II games were remade is because they aren't compatible with Generation III and above games, because Generation III brought a complete renovation of the game mechanics. So, to make all the games compatible, they remade the first two generations. Since everything's compatible with each other now, there's no need for more remakes. It's all new from here on out.

theres absolutely no reason that they would have to remake the remakes.
and i doubt that GBA games will be comparable with the 3DS.

your post is voided by logic.

 

[Tyeforce]

There won't be Ruby and Sapphire remakes. If they remade them, then they'd have to re-remake Red and Green. And then they'd have to remake Diamond and Pearl and re-remake Gold and Silver. It'd be an endless cycle of remakes, and nobody wants that. The reason why the Generation I and II games were remade is because they aren't compatible with Generation III and above games, because Generation III brought a complete renovation of the game mechanics. So, to make all the games compatible, they remade the first two generations. Since everything's compatible with each other now, there's no need for more remakes. It's all new from here on out.

theres absolutely no reason that they would have to remake the remakes.

your post is voided by logic.

Ah, but there is. If they remade Ruby and Sapphire but didn't remake FireRed and LeafGreen, then (Fire)Red and (Leaf)Green would be left as the odd ones out. And if that doesn't seem like a valid reason for you, here's another: There's no reason to remake them. The remaking of Red & Green and Gold & Silver had a good reason behind it; because the original games are no longer compatible with current generations. So, to make all of the games compatible, the older ones needed to be remade. Ever since Generation III, all main series Pok

 

[beehdaubs]

There won't be Ruby and Sapphire remakes. If they remade them, then they'd have to re-remake Red and Green. And then they'd have to remake Diamond and Pearl and re-remake Gold and Silver. It'd be an endless cycle of remakes, and nobody wants that. The reason why the Generation I and II games were remade is because they aren't compatible with Generation III and above games, because Generation III brought a complete renovation of the game mechanics. So, to make all the games compatible, they remade the first two generations. Since everything's compatible with each other now, there's no need for more remakes. It's all new from here on out.

theres absolutely no reason that they would have to remake the remakes.

your post is voided by logic.

Ah, but there is. If they remade Ruby and Sapphire but didn't remake FireRed and LeafGreen, then (Fire)Red and (Leaf)Green would be left as the odd ones out. And if that doesn't seem like a valid reason for you, here's another: There's no reason to remake them. The remaking of Red & Green and Gold & Silver had a good reason behind it; because the original games are no longer compatible with current generations. So, to make all of the games compatible, the older ones needed to be remade. Ever since Generation III, all main series Pok

 

[Darkwind]

they'll probably just remake Red and blue again on their own sometime in the future.
you know, once the technology gets old.

but they're not gonna go all ape *censored.2.0* about it.
its nintendo. they'll decide whether or not to make em based on the fans and potential revenue.

now then, enough with this formal off topicness. I demand suggestions for names.

 

[Tyeforce]

There won't be Ruby and Sapphire remakes. If they remade them, then they'd have to re-remake Red and Green. And then they'd have to remake Diamond and Pearl and re-remake Gold and Silver. It'd be an endless cycle of remakes, and nobody wants that. The reason why the Generation I and II games were remade is because they aren't compatible with Generation III and above games, because Generation III brought a complete renovation of the game mechanics. So, to make all the games compatible, they remade the first two generations. Since everything's compatible with each other now, there's no need for more remakes. It's all new from here on out.

theres absolutely no reason that they would have to remake the remakes.

your post is voided by logic.

Ah, but there is. If they remade Ruby and Sapphire but didn't remake FireRed and LeafGreen, then (Fire)Red and (Leaf)Green would be left as the odd ones out. And if that doesn't seem like a valid reason for you, here's another: There's no reason to remake them. The remaking of Red & Green and Gold & Silver had a good reason behind it; because the original games are no longer compatible with current generations. So, to make all of the games compatible, the older ones needed to be remade. Ever since Generation III, all main series Pok

 

[Darkwind]

silly tyeforce. ruining fun topics with your words.
but I can prove that if there are remakes of ruby and saphire that there will not be remakes of FR/LG in a mere 4 words.

" It would be stupid."