Scariest moment in Brawl?

Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Scarriest moment?

When I realized how it couldn't compare to Melee, and yet again Nintendo made a not-as-fun-as-the-original(s) sequel.
Tourneyfa...er, "competitive player"...*sigh*
No, I'm not a competitive player at all.

Unless you count me and my brother playing on the couch in our living room as competitive playing. That's about the only Smash-Bros multiplayer I've ever done.

...Don't assume stuff.
 
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Scarriest moment?

When I realized how it couldn't compare to Melee, and yet again Nintendo made a not-as-fun-as-the-original(s) sequel.
Tourneyfa...er, "competitive player"...*sigh*
competitive player? that has nothing to do with it
 
Grawr said:
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Scarriest moment?

When I realized how it couldn't compare to Melee, and yet again Nintendo made a not-as-fun-as-the-original(s) sequel.
Tourneyfa...er, "competitive player"...*sigh*
No, I'm not a competitive player at all.

Unless you count me and my brother playing on the couch in our living room as competitive playing. That's about the only Smash-Bros multiplayer I've ever done.

...Don't assume stuff.
Then how can you possible think that Brawl is less fun than Melee? HOW?! Brawl is SOOOO much more fun than Melee. There's SOOOO much more stuff. Final Smashes, Subspace Emissary, Stage Builder, Wi-Fi... HOW CAN YOU SAY MELEE IS BETTER?!
 
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Scarriest moment?

When I realized how it couldn't compare to Melee, and yet again Nintendo made a not-as-fun-as-the-original(s) sequel.
Tourneyfa...er, "competitive player"...*sigh*
No, I'm not a competitive player at all.

Unless you count me and my brother playing on the couch in our living room as competitive playing. That's about the only Smash-Bros multiplayer I've ever done.

...Don't assume stuff.
Then how can you possible think that Brawl is less fun than Melee? HOW?! Brawl is SOOOO much more fun than Melee. There's SOOOO much more stuff. Final Smashes, Subspace Emissary, Stage Builder, Wi-Fi... HOW CAN YOU SAY MELEE IS BETTER?!
woohoo final smashes another item that can OHKO, subspace emisfail fastest easiest story ever. the fact you can't play them on wifi ruins it, brawls Wi-Fi is the biggest pile of crap i've ever seen

easily better, if only they didn't rush ssbb
 
Horus said:
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Scarriest moment?

When I realized how it couldn't compare to Melee, and yet again Nintendo made a not-as-fun-as-the-original(s) sequel.
Tourneyfa...er, "competitive player"...*sigh*
No, I'm not a competitive player at all.

Unless you count me and my brother playing on the couch in our living room as competitive playing. That's about the only Smash-Bros multiplayer I've ever done.

...Don't assume stuff.
Then how can you possible think that Brawl is less fun than Melee? HOW?! Brawl is SOOOO much more fun than Melee. There's SOOOO much more stuff. Final Smashes, Subspace Emissary, Stage Builder, Wi-Fi... HOW CAN YOU SAY MELEE IS BETTER?!
woohoo final smashes another item that can OHKO, subspace emisfail fastest easiest story ever. the fact you can't play them on wifi ruins it, brawls Wi-Fi is the biggest pile of crap i've ever seen

easily better, if only they didn't rush ssbb
Wow...are you really that stupid? Final Smashes are just plain awesome. Subspace Emissary was actually quite long and difficult, and although it lacked in story depth (hey, it's from SAKURAI, creator of KIRBY), it had beautiful action packed cutscenes and had a lot of Kirby Super Star feel to it. And why would you care if you can't play created stages on Wi-Fi if you hate Brawl's online play anyway? I'll admit, it's not the greatest, but at least it's there. Melee didn't have it at all. And you're telling me they RUSHED Brawl?! AHAHAHAHAHA!!! Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee. But yeah, it was still a rush to include ALL THE FREAKING NEW STUFF in such limited time. If they would have waited even longer, then yes, the Wi-Fi would probably have been fixed and more characters would have been added, maybe more items, game modes, and a more in depth adventure mode. But Brawl as it is is still A LOT better than Melee.
 
Tyeforce said:
Horus said:
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Tyeforce said:
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
No, I'm not a competitive player at all.

Unless you count me and my brother playing on the couch in our living room as competitive playing. That's about the only Smash-Bros multiplayer I've ever done.

...Don't assume stuff.
Then how can you possible think that Brawl is less fun than Melee? HOW?! Brawl is SOOOO much more fun than Melee. There's SOOOO much more stuff. Final Smashes, Subspace Emissary, Stage Builder, Wi-Fi... HOW CAN YOU SAY MELEE IS BETTER?!
woohoo final smashes another item that can OHKO, subspace emisfail fastest easiest story ever. the fact you can't play them on wifi ruins it, brawls Wi-Fi is the biggest pile of crap i've ever seen

easily better, if only they didn't rush ssbb
Wow...are you really that stupid? Final Smashes are just plain awesome. Subspace Emissary was actually quite long and difficult, and although it lacked in story depth (hey, it's from SAKURAI, creator of KIRBY), it had beautiful action packed cutscenes and had a lot of Kirby Super Star feel to it. And why would you care if you can't play created stages on Wi-Fi if you hate Brawl's online play anyway? I'll admit, it's not the greatest, but at least it's there. Melee didn't have it at all. And you're telling me they RUSHED Brawl?! AHAHAHAHAHA!!! Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee. But yeah, it was still a rush to include ALL THE FREAKING NEW STUFF in such limited time. If they would have waited even longer, then yes, the Wi-Fi would probably have been fixed and more characters would have been added, maybe more items, game modes, and a more in depth adventure mode. But Brawl as it is is still A LOT better than Melee.
if the add new content, they should make it the greatest it can be. not a crappy version :\
 
Horus said:
Tyeforce said:
Horus said:
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Then how can you possible think that Brawl is less fun than Melee? HOW?! Brawl is SOOOO much more fun than Melee. There's SOOOO much more stuff. Final Smashes, Subspace Emissary, Stage Builder, Wi-Fi... HOW CAN YOU SAY MELEE IS BETTER?!
woohoo final smashes another item that can OHKO, subspace emisfail fastest easiest story ever. the fact you can't play them on wifi ruins it, brawls Wi-Fi is the biggest pile of crap i've ever seen

easily better, if only they didn't rush ssbb
Wow...are you really that stupid? Final Smashes are just plain awesome. Subspace Emissary was actually quite long and difficult, and although it lacked in story depth (hey, it's from SAKURAI, creator of KIRBY), it had beautiful action packed cutscenes and had a lot of Kirby Super Star feel to it. And why would you care if you can't play created stages on Wi-Fi if you hate Brawl's online play anyway? I'll admit, it's not the greatest, but at least it's there. Melee didn't have it at all. And you're telling me they RUSHED Brawl?! AHAHAHAHAHA!!! Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee. But yeah, it was still a rush to include ALL THE FREAKING NEW STUFF in such limited time. If they would have waited even longer, then yes, the Wi-Fi would probably have been fixed and more characters would have been added, maybe more items, game modes, and a more in depth adventure mode. But Brawl as it is is still A LOT better than Melee.
if the add new content, they should make it the greatest it can be. not a crappy version :\
The only thing "crappy" about Brawl is the Wi-Fi, which isn't that big of a deal. I'd much rather play local multiplayer with a friend than online, anyway.
 
Tyeforce said:
Horus said:
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Tyeforce said:
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
No, I'm not a competitive player at all.

Unless you count me and my brother playing on the couch in our living room as competitive playing. That's about the only Smash-Bros multiplayer I've ever done.

...Don't assume stuff.
Then how can you possible think that Brawl is less fun than Melee? HOW?! Brawl is SOOOO much more fun than Melee. There's SOOOO much more stuff. Final Smashes, Subspace Emissary, Stage Builder, Wi-Fi... HOW CAN YOU SAY MELEE IS BETTER?!
woohoo final smashes another item that can OHKO, subspace emisfail fastest easiest story ever. the fact you can't play them on wifi ruins it, brawls Wi-Fi is the biggest pile of crap i've ever seen

easily better, if only they didn't rush ssbb
Wow...are you really that stupid? Final Smashes are just plain awesome. Subspace Emissary was actually quite long and difficult, and although it lacked in story depth (hey, it's from SAKURAI, creator of KIRBY), it had beautiful action packed cutscenes and had a lot of Kirby Super Star feel to it. And why would you care if you can't play created stages on Wi-Fi if you hate Brawl's online play anyway? I'll admit, it's not the greatest, but at least it's there. Melee didn't have it at all. And you're telling me they RUSHED Brawl?! AHAHAHAHAHA!!! Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee. But yeah, it was still a rush to include ALL THE FREAKING NEW STUFF in such limited time. If they would have waited even longer, then yes, the Wi-Fi would probably have been fixed and more characters would have been added, maybe more items, game modes, and a more in depth adventure mode. But Brawl as it is is still A LOT better than Melee.
In order to professionally make your point across, you should avoid calling people "stupid", and avoid using your own opinion as your support/backup to your claims.

If this were a real debate, what would stop me from countering everything you just said with this?

I disliked the Final Smashes. I thought they were a bad edition to the game. I don't think Subspace Emissary had action packed cutscenes at all, I found them rather dull.

Yeah. Nothing.

And I would check your facts on the whole "Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee" idea. I'm pretty sure there wasn't a big difference in development times.

So, in the end, it comes down to a difference in opinions, which I'm sure you're aware would happen.

In my delightfully humble opinion, Melee is still a LOT better then Brawl. ; )
 
Tyeforce said:
Horus said:
Tyeforce said:
Horus said:
Tyeforce said:
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
woohoo final smashes another item that can OHKO, subspace emisfail fastest easiest story ever. the fact you can't play them on wifi ruins it, brawls Wi-Fi is the biggest pile of crap i've ever seen

easily better, if only they didn't rush ssbb
Wow...are you really that stupid? Final Smashes are just plain awesome. Subspace Emissary was actually quite long and difficult, and although it lacked in story depth (hey, it's from SAKURAI, creator of KIRBY), it had beautiful action packed cutscenes and had a lot of Kirby Super Star feel to it. And why would you care if you can't play created stages on Wi-Fi if you hate Brawl's online play anyway? I'll admit, it's not the greatest, but at least it's there. Melee didn't have it at all. And you're telling me they RUSHED Brawl?! AHAHAHAHAHA!!! Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee. But yeah, it was still a rush to include ALL THE FREAKING NEW STUFF in such limited time. If they would have waited even longer, then yes, the Wi-Fi would probably have been fixed and more characters would have been added, maybe more items, game modes, and a more in depth adventure mode. But Brawl as it is is still A LOT better than Melee.
if the add new content, they should make it the greatest it can be. not a crappy version :\
The only thing "crappy" about Brawl is the Wi-Fi, which isn't that big of a deal. I'd much rather play local multiplayer with a friend than online, anyway.
the wifi is just...fail if someone is in a different state it laggs -.-
and then there's those NES game things, its like 50 seconds of a game big whoop

i like brawl (especially its combat system) but i hate most of the features
 
Grawr said:
Tyeforce said:
Horus said:
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Then how can you possible think that Brawl is less fun than Melee? HOW?! Brawl is SOOOO much more fun than Melee. There's SOOOO much more stuff. Final Smashes, Subspace Emissary, Stage Builder, Wi-Fi... HOW CAN YOU SAY MELEE IS BETTER?!
woohoo final smashes another item that can OHKO, subspace emisfail fastest easiest story ever. the fact you can't play them on wifi ruins it, brawls Wi-Fi is the biggest pile of crap i've ever seen

easily better, if only they didn't rush ssbb
Wow...are you really that stupid? Final Smashes are just plain awesome. Subspace Emissary was actually quite long and difficult, and although it lacked in story depth (hey, it's from SAKURAI, creator of KIRBY), it had beautiful action packed cutscenes and had a lot of Kirby Super Star feel to it. And why would you care if you can't play created stages on Wi-Fi if you hate Brawl's online play anyway? I'll admit, it's not the greatest, but at least it's there. Melee didn't have it at all. And you're telling me they RUSHED Brawl?! AHAHAHAHAHA!!! Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee. But yeah, it was still a rush to include ALL THE FREAKING NEW STUFF in such limited time. If they would have waited even longer, then yes, the Wi-Fi would probably have been fixed and more characters would have been added, maybe more items, game modes, and a more in depth adventure mode. But Brawl as it is is still A LOT better than Melee.
In order to professionally make your point across, you should avoid calling people "stupid", and avoid using your own opinion as your support/backup to your claims.

If this were a real debate, what would stop me from countering everything you just said with this?

I disliked the Final Smashes. I thought they were a bad edition to the game. I don't think Subspace Emissary had action packed cutscenes at all, I found them rather dull.

Yeah. Nothing.

And I would check your facts on the whole "Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee" idea. I'm pretty sure there wasn't a big difference in development times.

So, in the end, it comes down to a difference in opinions, which I'm sure you're aware would happen.

In my delightfully humble opinion, Melee is still a LOT better then Brawl. ; )
You're weird... I don't understand how anyone who isn't a competitive player can say that Melee is better. Brawl has so much more. More characters, more items, more game modes, more fun.
 
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Tyeforce said:
Horus said:
Tyeforce said:
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
woohoo final smashes another item that can OHKO, subspace emisfail fastest easiest story ever. the fact you can't play them on wifi ruins it, brawls Wi-Fi is the biggest pile of crap i've ever seen

easily better, if only they didn't rush ssbb
Wow...are you really that stupid? Final Smashes are just plain awesome. Subspace Emissary was actually quite long and difficult, and although it lacked in story depth (hey, it's from SAKURAI, creator of KIRBY), it had beautiful action packed cutscenes and had a lot of Kirby Super Star feel to it. And why would you care if you can't play created stages on Wi-Fi if you hate Brawl's online play anyway? I'll admit, it's not the greatest, but at least it's there. Melee didn't have it at all. And you're telling me they RUSHED Brawl?! AHAHAHAHAHA!!! Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee. But yeah, it was still a rush to include ALL THE FREAKING NEW STUFF in such limited time. If they would have waited even longer, then yes, the Wi-Fi would probably have been fixed and more characters would have been added, maybe more items, game modes, and a more in depth adventure mode. But Brawl as it is is still A LOT better than Melee.
In order to professionally make your point across, you should avoid calling people "stupid", and avoid using your own opinion as your support/backup to your claims.

If this were a real debate, what would stop me from countering everything you just said with this?

I disliked the Final Smashes. I thought they were a bad edition to the game. I don't think Subspace Emissary had action packed cutscenes at all, I found them rather dull.

Yeah. Nothing.

And I would check your facts on the whole "Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee" idea. I'm pretty sure there wasn't a big difference in development times.

So, in the end, it comes down to a difference in opinions, which I'm sure you're aware would happen.

In my delightfully humble opinion, Melee is still a LOT better then Brawl. ; )
You're weird... I don't understand how anyone who isn't a competitive player can say that Melee is better. Brawl has so much more. More characters, more items, more game modes, more fun.
Hahaha.

More name calling. That's awfully fabulous.

You have a wonderful evening, Tyeforce. I'm going to bed.
 
Grawr said:
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Tyeforce said:
Horus said:
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
Wow...are you really that stupid? Final Smashes are just plain awesome. Subspace Emissary was actually quite long and difficult, and although it lacked in story depth (hey, it's from SAKURAI, creator of KIRBY), it had beautiful action packed cutscenes and had a lot of Kirby Super Star feel to it. And why would you care if you can't play created stages on Wi-Fi if you hate Brawl's online play anyway? I'll admit, it's not the greatest, but at least it's there. Melee didn't have it at all. And you're telling me they RUSHED Brawl?! AHAHAHAHAHA!!! Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee. But yeah, it was still a rush to include ALL THE FREAKING NEW STUFF in such limited time. If they would have waited even longer, then yes, the Wi-Fi would probably have been fixed and more characters would have been added, maybe more items, game modes, and a more in depth adventure mode. But Brawl as it is is still A LOT better than Melee.
In order to professionally make your point across, you should avoid calling people "stupid", and avoid using your own opinion as your support/backup to your claims.

If this were a real debate, what would stop me from countering everything you just said with this?

I disliked the Final Smashes. I thought they were a bad edition to the game. I don't think Subspace Emissary had action packed cutscenes at all, I found them rather dull.

Yeah. Nothing.

And I would check your facts on the whole "Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee" idea. I'm pretty sure there wasn't a big difference in development times.

So, in the end, it comes down to a difference in opinions, which I'm sure you're aware would happen.

In my delightfully humble opinion, Melee is still a LOT better then Brawl. ; )
You're weird... I don't understand how anyone who isn't a competitive player can say that Melee is better. Brawl has so much more. More characters, more items, more game modes, more fun.
Hahaha.

More name calling. That's awfully fabulous.

You have a wonderful evening, Tyeforce. I'm going to bed.
I'm calling you weird... How is that name calling? Weird is an adjective. "Of a strikingly odd or unusual character; strange." And your attitude towards Brawl is strange, therefore I'm calling you weird.
 
Guys, just CALM DOWN.

Everyone has their own opinions.

To be honest?

I hate all Brawls. To boring for me. I remember when I FIRST rented the game. Like, months after it came out. Just even when I got to the character select screen, I seriously turned my Wii off and packaged the game back up to return.

If you guys want to flame me, go ahead. Just don't fight over who thinks its competitive or not.
 
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Tyeforce said:
Grawr said:
Tyeforce said:
Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
In order to professionally make your point across, you should avoid calling people "stupid", and avoid using your own opinion as your support/backup to your claims.

If this were a real debate, what would stop me from countering everything you just said with this?

I disliked the Final Smashes. I thought they were a bad edition to the game. I don't think Subspace Emissary had action packed cutscenes at all, I found them rather dull.

Yeah. Nothing.

And I would check your facts on the whole "Brawl was in development MUCH longer than Melee" idea. I'm pretty sure there wasn't a big difference in development times.

So, in the end, it comes down to a difference in opinions, which I'm sure you're aware would happen.

In my delightfully humble opinion, Melee is still a LOT better then Brawl. ; )
You're weird... I don't understand how anyone who isn't a competitive player can say that Melee is better. Brawl has so much more. More characters, more items, more game modes, more fun.
Hahaha.

More name calling. That's awfully fabulous.

You have a wonderful evening, Tyeforce. I'm going to bed.
I'm calling you weird... How is that name calling? Weird is an adjective. "Of a strikingly odd or unusual character; strange." And your attitude towards Brawl is strange, therefore I'm calling you weird.
"Weird" can be used as an adjective or a noun. Just like many words that would be considered "name calling".

Like "stupid", for example. That's an adjective, but it's also a noun.


Not that any of that even matters, however. Go out into the world and call someone "Weird". You'll see what kind of response you'll get. ; )

Don't try to get fancy, Tyeforce.

My attitude towards Brawl is strange? Says who? You? Only?

That's what I thought. My attitude towards Brawl is strange, but only in your opinion. Therefor, why do I care?

I'm done with this conversation.

Melee was more fast-paced, and I found myself playing that for years and years after it released. Brawl was slower, and I only played that for a month or two after it was released.
 
Grawr, you just keep going at it don't you?

Shows how mature you are to fight over something as stupid as a crappy game.

You say you're done with this thread, but we know you're going to post the last word after you read this.

I'll sit here counting.
 
Back
Top