First of all, I have no dislike or hate for the guide as some seem to believe. I think Skyfall knows well that I appreciate it and find it quite interesting to read, as I actually do quite frequently. But I believe it's important that people do not feel pressured into following whatever price a guide says is the price. Now it would seem that most of the community has accepted that already and is quite happy with it, but I don't plan to encourage it more. It's also important that others can create their own price guides if they disagree with the existing one. By endorsing one with a sticky, we're essentially offering a monopoly to that guide.
As for the comparisons to the villager thread, it really just comes down to a different time on the forum back then. I accept that it's not a good reason, but it's the reality. Many of you who have been around for a long time know, the Shop and collectibles have always been my "department" of sorts. Villagers and the Animal Crossing trading boards? Not so much. Back in the time when that thread stickied, nearly 2 years ago now, the former moderator Kaiaa generally was in charge of that board. For whatever reason Kaiaa had, she chose to sticky it right away and nobody was the wiser. (Tina has noted that for a long time, it was simply a tier list with zero prices) Of course things have changed since then, and we tend to discuss these matters with the team or at least ask a couple people first before doing so now to help reduce these inconsistencies.
I don't necessarily disagree that the villager guide is much different, but that's the reason why it is that way. Obviously, it's not very nice to pull the rug from under someone who works very hard on their thread and unsticky their thread when it has been that way for so long, so that's the predicament we've been left in and why it has remained stickied. If say the collectible guide had been stickied for a year, and then Jeremy came along and suddenly decided that it was wrong and needed to be demoted, I can't imagine many would take that very kindly and they wouldn't be entirely wrong to be upset. Of course, looking at it now, it seems that it's been mostly abandoned for quite some time so maybe we will revisit that soon.
This isn't a 100% dead set "no, it will never ever ever ever happen", but I'm gonna need some damn good convincing still. I'm open to any constructive and respectful debate in regards to the first paragraph and my reasons for being against it.
Firstly, apologies to Cadbberry for what I'm about to do, which is respond to Justin (which of course, is not the purpose of this "petition" thread, but since we have Justin's attention on this, I would like a chance to chime in).
Thank you for explaining the situation - now we know why there is an apparent discrepancy between the two boards. We posters sometimes forget that the Admins/Mods are not the Borg collective! That is, just because something is happening in one corner, it doesn't mean all Admins/Mods instantly know what is going on and certainly the decision wasn't unanimously made.
I do know what you mean about the Guide becoming too rigid in the mind of some - I have seen both sellers and buyers use the Guide, not as a resource to guide their own negotiations, but as a tool to avoid negotiations at all. It's easy to say, well, its guide prices and I'll stick with that... The guide range changing, either going up or down, ironically, is most often accomplished by people ignoring the ranges and buy/sell what feels right at that moment they are engaging the other user.
I don't know if I have a solution. I think there is a frustration that the guide is hard to find and we must constantly bump it. And there is a genuine desire by many users to protect the casual trader or newbies who may be taken advantage of since they are not familiar with the past history of sales.
I'm not wedded to this idea, but would having a [GUIDE] tag be helpful? This accomplishes two things, first, it makes it easier to find the guide, even if it's just to bump it back to the first page. Second, it opens up the possibility of other guides.
I don't think having multiple guides would be a bad thing. I would try to maintain the current Guide as (best I can) a true reflection of prices of the last few sales. But maybe some people want to dabble in a more predictive guide... people who want to say, well, there are 650 cupcakes, the prices *should* be in this range, etc. It's what happens in the real stock market or real estate market, so why not?
Just throwing ideas out there for everyone to munch on.

But this discussion is fun! It's nice that everyone is so thoughtful about it (so far, at least.).
- - - Post Merge - - -
Oh, just want to clarify what I wrote about multiple guides... I merely was pointing out that in real life, whether stock markets, real estate market, whatever, multiple "guides" always exists: Market analysts. And they all have different takes, different styles, and different followers. And it's not a bad thing to have multiple views out there. Yes, makes it more complicated to make up your own mind rather than having just one source, but it does break up the "monopoly."
(And just another random aside, that would sort of solve the problem of Hound00med's guide too. Even if that remains sticky-ed, another person can take up the mantle and provide more updated prices/popularity rankings, which I think some of the contributors to that thread may be itching to do.)