-
Zipper is back! Join us for TBT's Fourteenth Annual Easter Egg Hunt where you can follow clues to find hidden eggs around the forum, redeemable for new and returning Easter egg collectibles. One skillful egg hunter will also be rewarded with the Golden Easter Egg! Meanwhile, get creative in TBT's Fifth Egg Decorating Contest! -
Nuclear Weapons
- Thread starter Princess
- Start date
- Status
Psychonaut
Senior Member
solid enough logic. but when other people think the same way, OH *censored.3.0* WE HAVE TO GO AND TAKE OUT THEIR NUCLEAR WEAPONS OR ELSE WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEJeremy said:
but yeah, not being existed to begin with woulda been best solution. *censored.3.0*ing scientists, always messing *censored.2.0* up.
moonlight33
Senior Member
I think that they should be destroyed all over the world, but that isn't going to happen. The Earth will be destroyed by a nuclear war probably soon in the future.
bittermeat
Senior Member
Well, there are many ways that nuclear power can hugely benefit our lives. But at the same time, in the wrong hands, one mistake or scheme will only cause destruction. I appreciate what nuclear power can do to help the world, but I'm also aware of what it could do to destroy. For that, I believe we could live without it.
![[Nook]](/data/avatars/m/1/1990.jpg?1585850325){kind=avatar}
bittermeat
Senior Member
Why? This is actually something we all could talk about and discuss. It's an important subject.[Nook said:
Psychonaut
Senior Member
you are the reason why this kind of thread is necessary on tbt.[Nook said:
otherwise, it kills your iq. and that's bad.
the problem is, nuclear anything existing means it can, and will, be used by those who have "impure" motivation, and our paranoia will always build up, eventually making us question what other people are going to do with their power before we can use our power.
oh boy it's like i'm actually a spanish explorer looking for land for the queen.
Ron Ronaldo
Seer of Heart :33
Everyone should get rid of their weapons at the same time.
And then we could fly to Care-a-lot on rainbow unicorns for teatime with the Care Bears.
No but seriously, people need to agree on something; only disaster/a domino effect can result from the use of nuclear bombs. :L
And then we could fly to Care-a-lot on rainbow unicorns for teatime with the Care Bears.
No but seriously, people need to agree on something; only disaster/a domino effect can result from the use of nuclear bombs. :L
Slickyrider
Rider of Slickies
We're damned if we keep them, we're damned if we don't.
We can't create a fermetic barrier of nuclear weapons around the U.S., it would cause other nations to lose all trust in us.
While, at the same time, we cannot fully eliminate all nuclear arms: what about the extremists that wish to destroy us?
If anything, the entire world should gradually eliminate nuclear weapons altogether, for example: at first, every country reduces their nuclear arms to 100, then 80, then 60...and so forth.
We can't create a fermetic barrier of nuclear weapons around the U.S., it would cause other nations to lose all trust in us.
While, at the same time, we cannot fully eliminate all nuclear arms: what about the extremists that wish to destroy us?
If anything, the entire world should gradually eliminate nuclear weapons altogether, for example: at first, every country reduces their nuclear arms to 100, then 80, then 60...and so forth.
No.[Nook said:
The reason behind these threads, is to get those *censored.2.0*ty, pointless threads you have currently occupying the front page of the new posts board, out of the way.
So the members of this forum have something to actually discuss.
Yeah, let's just talk about Courtnee's face.[Nook said:
No but in the grand scheme of things nuclear weapons can be bad if they're used for malicious purposes. For defensive methods is another story, though I think the world would be better off without nuclear weapons altogether.
Psychonaut
Senior Member
fix'd.Muffun said:
BUT THEN THE ANIMALS. OH NOES.
Garrett x50 cal
Veteran AC Player
Damn you for taking mah words but yeah..this.Jeremy said:
I'm torn.
One one hand, there's always going to be someone crazy enough to use them, so self-defense may be necessary, but on the other hand, a massive amount of nuclear weapons is an absolute breeding ground for escalations of small conflicts.
North Korea is a great example of both of these. They're nuts, and seem to be perfectly willing to nuke someone, but on the other hand, without nukes, the whole thing would have a lesser chance of getting out of hand.
One one hand, there's always going to be someone crazy enough to use them, so self-defense may be necessary, but on the other hand, a massive amount of nuclear weapons is an absolute breeding ground for escalations of small conflicts.
North Korea is a great example of both of these. They're nuts, and seem to be perfectly willing to nuke someone, but on the other hand, without nukes, the whole thing would have a lesser chance of getting out of hand.
here is the thing.... they exist, and if only the people willing to commit atrocities had them then there would be no way to keep them in check really.
Plus what if an alien invades? Remember Independence Day? Fictional united states needed them to save the world!
When they were used, it was pretty horrible, but if the war we were in continued it really could have been just as bad if not worse. It was a hard call, horrible outcome, but it ended a horrible war that cost so very many lives.
Plus what if an alien invades? Remember Independence Day? Fictional united states needed them to save the world!
When they were used, it was pretty horrible, but if the war we were in continued it really could have been just as bad if not worse. It was a hard call, horrible outcome, but it ended a horrible war that cost so very many lives.
- Status
Similar threads
