New Batch of Zelda Wii Information

[Tyeforce]

Not every gerudo male has to be Ganondorf...

Not every hero has to be ]does[/i] have to be Zelda, according to Zelda II's backstory), and not every mapmaker has to be Tingle, yet the series has done a pretty good job at making these characters come back time and time again, lol. I'm sure there are other Gerudo males besides Ganondorf, but they're not the evil tyrant that Ganondorf is, so there's no need for a hero to defeat them, thus there's no need for a game to revolve around it, lol.

 

[Megamannt125]

If it's before OOT, then Ganondorf wouldn't be born yet.

Well, yes and no. That Ganondorf wouldn't have been born yet. There could be another Ganondorf before the Ocarina of Time one. Maybe the same Ganondorf from Four Swords Adventures, assuming my personal timeline is correct.

That Ganondorf is sealed in the Four Sword.

Not every hero has to be ]
Or the Gerudo male could not be evil and have nothing to do with the plot and we have a different villian.

 

[Mino]

I've always thought that Nintendo doesn't actually give a *censored.2.0* about the timeline. Speculate on it all you want, but I seriously doubt that there is a correct order. It's highly unlikely that a consistent narrative can be gleaned from the various titles, considering that the games have been made over the course of over two decades by varying teams of people (I know Shigeru is the executive producer or whatever on all of them, but those below him are the people that I'm talking about.)

 

[Megamannt125]

I've always thought that Nintendo doesn't actually give a *censored.2.0* about the timeline. Speculate on it all you want, but I seriously doubt that there is a correct order. It's highly unlikely that a consistent narrative can be gleaned from the various titles, considering that the games have been made over the course of over two decades by varying teams of people (I know Shigeru is the executive producer or whatever on all of them, but those below him are the people that I'm talking about.)

Except there is one...
http://www.gannon-banned.com/#timeline

 

[Tyeforce]

That Ganondorf is sealed in the Four Sword.

It could explain how he escaped... You never know.

Or the Gerudo male could not be evil and have nothing to do with the plot and we have a different villian.

Also possible, but I want to see Ganondorf in Zelda Wii... I'll be sad if Zelda Wii is as epic as it's looking to be but Ganondorf is absent from it.

 

[Megamannt125]

That Ganondorf is sealed in the Four Sword.

It could explain how he escaped... You never know.

Or the Gerudo male could not be evil and have nothing to do with the plot and we have a different villian.

Also possible, but I want to see Ganondorf in Zelda Wii... I'll be sad if Zelda Wii is as epic as it's looking to be but Ganondorf is absent from it.

Ganondorf is getting stale, we need a really good villian.
After Ganondorf was introduced in TP for instance, the game got bland, stale, and uninteresting.

 

[Tyeforce]

That Ganondorf is sealed in the Four Sword.

It could explain how he escaped... You never know.

Or the Gerudo male could not be evil and have nothing to do with the plot and we have a different villian.

Also possible, but I want to see Ganondorf in Zelda Wii... I'll be sad if Zelda Wii is as epic as it's looking to be but Ganondorf is absent from it.

Ganondorf is getting stale, we need a really good villian.
After Ganondorf was introduced in TP for instance, the game got bland, stale, and uninteresting.

He may not have been at his best in Twilight Princess, but look at The Wind Waker. Ganondorf was amazing in that game. They could bring him back like he was in Thw Wind Waker, better than ever.

 

[Tyler.]

I just thought of something. If the rumor is true and the game will be called The Legend of Zelda, wouldn't there be 2 games with the same name? The first Zelda and this one?

 

[Tyeforce]

I just thought of something. If the rumor is true and the game will be called The Legend of Zelda, wouldn't there be 2 games with the same name? The first Zelda and this one?

Yes, which is why I don't believe that Nintendo would do that. And just think of all the confusion that will cause among theorists who use acronyms all the time! We'll have to say "LoZ(NES)" and "LoZ(Wii)" in order to avoid confusion. >_>

 

[Ciaran]

I just thought of something. If the rumor is true and the game will be called The Legend of Zelda, wouldn't there be 2 games with the same name? The first Zelda and this one?

Yes, which is why I don't believe that Nintendo would do that. And just think of all the confusion that will cause among theorists who use acronyms all the time! We'll have to say "LoZ(NES)" and "LoZ(Wii)" in order to avoid confusion. >_>

OH NO, THE HORROR, THE HORROR!!

HOW COULD YOU NINTENDO YOU GOD FORSAKEN MONSTER?!?!?

 

[Tyeforce]

I just thought of something. If the rumor is true and the game will be called The Legend of Zelda, wouldn't there be 2 games with the same name? The first Zelda and this one?

Yes, which is why I don't believe that Nintendo would do that. And just think of all the confusion that will cause among theorists who use acronyms all the time! We'll have to say "LoZ(NES)" and "LoZ(Wii)" in order to avoid confusion. >_>

OH NO, THE HORROR, THE HORROR!!

HOW COULD YOU NINTENDO YOU GOD FORSAKEN MONSTER?!?!?

But seriously, Nintendo isn't known for doing this. The only example that I can think of is Punch-Out!!, and that's a great deal different than Zelda.

 

[Trent the Paladin]

I just thought of something. If the rumor is true and the game will be called The Legend of Zelda, wouldn't there be 2 games with the same name? The first Zelda and this one?

Yes, which is why I don't believe that Nintendo would do that. And just think of all the confusion that will cause among theorists who use acronyms all the time! We'll have to say "LoZ(NES)" and "LoZ(Wii)" in order to avoid confusion. >_>

OH NO, THE HORROR, THE HORROR!!

HOW COULD YOU NINTENDO YOU GOD FORSAKEN MONSTER?!?!?

But seriously, Nintendo isn't known for doing this. The only example that I can think of is Punch-Out!!, and that's a great deal different than Zelda.

Still, even if they do go through with the no subtitle thing, it's not like it would kill someone to A) Use boxart or B ) Use parenthesis system name.

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

OH NO, THE HORROR, THE HORROR!!

HOW COULD YOU NINTENDO YOU GOD FORSAKEN MONSTER?!?!?

But seriously, Nintendo isn't known for doing this. The only example that I can think of is Punch-Out!!, and that's a great deal different than Zelda.

Still, even if they do go through with the no subtitle thing, it's not like it would kill someone to A) Use boxart or B ) Use parenthesis system name.

Still, it's going to be a pain when talking about it. It's already hard enough to distinguish games like Sonic the Hedgehog (1991) and Sonic the Hedgehog (2006) from each other vocally. Of course, I guess people will just continue to call it "Zelda Wii", making it easier. But for people who always use the full, correct titles like me, it's going to be a pain. >_>

And don't think that I'm saying that the rumor is unlikely just because it would make things more difficult. I think it's unlikely because Nintendo isn't known for reusing titles like this.

 

[Ciaran]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

But seriously, Nintendo isn't known for doing this. The only example that I can think of is Punch-Out!!, and that's a great deal different than Zelda.

Still, even if they do go through with the no subtitle thing, it's not like it would kill someone to A) Use boxart or B ) Use parenthesis system name.

Still, it's going to be a pain when talking about it. It's already hard enough to distinguish games like Sonic the Hedgehog (1991) and Sonic the Hedgehog (2006) from each other vocally. Of course, I guess people will just continue to call it "Zelda Wii", making it easier. But for people who always use the full, correct titles like me, it's going to be a pain. >_>

And don't think that I'm saying that the rumor is unlikely just because it would make things more difficult. I think it's unlikely because Nintendo isn't known for reusing titles like this.

But if it's going to be the very first zelda chronlogically, then it makes sense.

Plus nintendos 'expanded market' bull*censored.2.0*.

 

[Trent the Paladin]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

But seriously, Nintendo isn't known for doing this. The only example that I can think of is Punch-Out!!, and that's a great deal different than Zelda.

Still, even if they do go through with the no subtitle thing, it's not like it would kill someone to A) Use boxart or B ) Use parenthesis system name.

Still, it's going to be a pain when talking about it. It's already hard enough to distinguish games like Sonic the Hedgehog (1991) and Sonic the Hedgehog (2006) from each other vocally. Of course, I guess people will just continue to call it "Zelda Wii", making it easier. But for people who always use the full, correct titles like me, it's going to be a pain. >_>

And don't think that I'm saying that the rumor is unlikely just because it would make things more difficult. I think it's unlikely because Nintendo isn't known for reusing titles like this.

STOP.

SONIC THE HEDGEHOG (06) IS NOT A GAME. IT IS THE DEVIL'S WORK AND SHOULD PROMPTLY BE DESTROYED.

Secondly, there's like three Sonic the Hedgehogs. Genesis/Mega Drive, Game Gear, and then the devil's work.



And Nintendo is probably going to add some sort of subtitle anyways.

 

[Garrett x50 cal]

Stupid, 90% Not going to happen. * Zelda Wii's official title is "The Legend of Zelda". There will be no subtitle.

More reasons for fanboy's to argue the time-line. * The game tells a story several hundred years before Ocarina of Time.It also answers the question of how the Mastersword came into being.

Isn't there always an important girl in the games? * The fairy-like girl plays is a very important character in the game. Her Name is Zordiana.

Of course it won't, another failed product Ninty. * The Hookshot is also in the game and it has new abilities. It will not pull you immediately to the target you aimed. Now it is possible to swing with the Hookshot, like with the Grappling Hook from WW. The Hookshot makes no use of Wii Motion Plus.

Cool, I guess. * Sometimes you have to "draw" a specific symbol on a door with your sword, to open it.

Never played it. * The Bow-Control is very similar to the Bow-Control in Wii Sports Resort, as the script shows.

Good. * There are two levels of difficulty. Aonuma put it through. Miyamoto didn't want to include it.The Normal-Mode for amateurs. The Hero-Mode has no "Super Guide" included and the enemies tougher.

error 404 wut * The On-Stage Dungeon, which is also playable at E3, isn't a Dungeon as we know it from the Zelda series. When entering a Dungeon, you will not notice you are in one. It will be a smooth gradation. There will be Dungeons with no Bosses and Bosses with no Dungeon. The "Dungeon" you are able to play at E3 will be an Ice-Level. It will be the first "Dungeon" in the Game.

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deeponly example that I can think of is Punch-Out!!, and that's a great deal different than Zelda.

Still, even if they do go through with the no subtitle thing, it's not like it would kill someone to A) Use boxart or B ) Use parenthesis system name.

Still, it's going to be a pain when talking about it. It's already hard enough to distinguish games like Sonic the Hedgehog (1991) and Sonic the Hedgehog (2006) from each other vocally. Of course, I guess people will just continue to call it "Zelda Wii", making it easier. But for people who always use the full, correct titles like me, it's going to be a pain. >_>

And don't think that I'm saying that the rumor is unlikely just because it would make things more difficult. I think it's unlikely because Nintendo isn't known for reusing titles like this.

But if it's going to be the very first zelda chronlogically, then it makes sense.

Plus nintendos 'expanded market' bull*censored.2.0*.

Who said it would be the first game in the timeline? The facts point to The Minish Cap, Four Swords, and Four Swords Adventures all taking place before Ocarina of Time. All the rumor says is that it takes place before Ocarina of Time. It doesn't say that it takes place before The Minish Cap.

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deeponly example that I can think of is Punch-Out!!, and that's a great deal different than Zelda.

Still, even if they do go through with the no subtitle thing, it's not like it would kill someone to A) Use boxart or B ) Use parenthesis system name.

Still, it's going to be a pain when talking about it. It's already hard enough to distinguish games like Sonic the Hedgehog (1991) and Sonic the Hedgehog (2006) from each other vocally. Of course, I guess people will just continue to call it "Zelda Wii", making it easier. But for people who always use the full, correct titles like me, it's going to be a pain. >_>

And don't think that I'm saying that the rumor is unlikely just because it would make things more difficult. I think it's unlikely because Nintendo isn't known for reusing titles like this.

STOP.

SONIC THE HEDGEHOG (06) IS NOT A GAME. IT IS THE DEVIL'S WORK AND SHOULD PROMPTLY BE DESTROYED.

Secondly, there's like three Sonic the Hedgehogs. Genesis/Mega Drive, Game Gear, and then the devil's work.



And Nintendo is probably going to add some sort of subtitle anyways.

You have a point. XD

And yeah, I forgot about the Game Gear Sonic the Hedgehog, lol.

 

[Megamannt125]

Actually Tye, the first LoZ's true name isn't Legend of Zelda, it's Hyrule Fantasy: The Legend of Zelda.

 

[SilentHopes]

I'm so going to get this.