Natal

Megamannt125

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Posts
7,431
Bells
370
Avatar Width Extension
Avatar Height Extension
Oh wow
I'd sure love to pay 200 dollars to do this
<object type='application/x-shockwave-flash' width="250" height="250" data='http://www.youtube.com/v/Jm0KKa6wACQ'>
<param name='AllowScriptAccess' value='never' />
<param name='wmode' value='transparent' />
<param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/Jm0KKa6wACQ' /><param name='play' value='true' />
<param name='loop' value='true' /><param name='quality' value='high' /></object>
 
Way to expensive. I pay 60 bucks for a game I should have the right to get a discount.
 
...First of all did you notice the audience? A 4 year old with his parents, the game involved flailing your arms around like a dumb-*censored.2.0*. What do most children 5 and under love to do? Yes.



Great video in attempt to troll Microsoft.


About the price...yeah it is a little too expensive BUT Natal is kinda trying to be a new console not just a peripheral, so the Wii was 250 so 200 isn't that bad.


Lastly if these type of "games" are the only thing to be released it will fail.
 
John102 said:
Or you could pay 200 and get the exact same thing made by Nintendo =D
No, you could pay 200 bucks and get something that's just as ********, but in a different way.

I think any sort of motion controls are harmful to video games, but it's quite clear that this video is hardly a good demonstration of what Natal can do. Nice try.
 
Games with motion controls should have an option to play it without motion controls, like ACCF, except you can move with the nunchuk or the Wiimote pointer without changing any options.
 
SSgt. Garrett said:
...First of all did you notice the audience? A 4 year old with his parents, the game involved flailing your arms around like a dumb-*censored.2.0*. What do most children 5 and under love to do? Yes.



Great video in attempt to troll Microsoft.


About the price...yeah it is a little too expensive BUT Natal is kinda trying to be a new console not just a peripheral, so the Wii was 250 so 200 isn't that bad.


Lastly if these type of "games" are the only thing to be released it will fail.
It wasn't trolling microsoft, it was showing the truth. Click on it, go to full screen, then see how Microsoft fails.
 
Nevermore said:
SSgt. Garrett said:
...First of all did you notice the audience? A 4 year old with his parents, the game involved flailing your arms around like a dumb-*censored.2.0*. What do most children 5 and under love to do? Yes.



Great video in attempt to troll Microsoft.


About the price...yeah it is a little too expensive BUT Natal is kinda trying to be a new console not just a peripheral, so the Wii was 250 so 200 isn't that bad.


Lastly if these type of "games" are the only thing to be released it will fail.
It wasn't trolling microsoft, it was showing the truth. Click on it, go to full screen, then see how Microsoft fails.
What the *censored.3.0* was that? I could watch it on a postage stamp, or a movie theater screen I would see the same thing, get your full-screen BS outta' here.

And yes, why else would Mega post this, he highly dislikes Microsoft.
 
SSgt. Garrett said:
...First of all did you notice the audience? A 4 year old with his parents, the game involved flailing your arms around like a dumb-*censored.2.0*. What do most children 5 and under love to do? Yes.



Great video in attempt to troll Microsoft.


About the price...yeah it is a little too expensive BUT Natal is kinda trying to be a new console not just a peripheral, so the Wii was 250 so 200 isn't that bad.


Lastly if these type of "games" are the only thing to be released it will fail.
were we watching the same video?

the kids looked bored as *censored.2.0*, the dad had this tone of "i am only doing this because i have to", and the mom is probably mentally handicapped.

not to mention the *censored.2.0*ty recognition, heads were touching feet, etc

and thirdly, let's take another look at what's happening:

people are flailing around aimlessly. they don't know what they're supposed to be doing, no cues as to how to move, no feeling. they were supposed to be hitting balls and instead moved about frantically in hopes that it would work, something comparable to the whole "putting your hand in front of the eyetoy" deal.

it shouldn't work, it won't work, and god damnit i'd rather wave a *censored.8.7* around in some sort of controlled fashion than DURRR FLAILAN, but if it's all the same i just want my *censored.3.0*ing controller.
 
SSgt. Garrett said:
Nevermore said:
SSgt. Garrett said:
...First of all did you notice the audience? A 4 year old with his parents, the game involved flailing your arms around like a dumb-*censored.2.0*. What do most children 5 and under love to do? Yes.



Great video in attempt to troll Microsoft.


About the price...yeah it is a little too expensive BUT Natal is kinda trying to be a new console not just a peripheral, so the Wii was 250 so 200 isn't that bad.


Lastly if these type of "games" are the only thing to be released it will fail.
It wasn't trolling microsoft, it was showing the truth. Click on it, go to full screen, then see how Microsoft fails.
What the *censored.3.0* was that? I could watch it on a postage stamp, or a movie theater screen I would see the same thing, get your full-screen BS outta' here.

And yes, why else would Mega post this, he highly dislikes Microsoft.
It does though, the moves are synchronized.
 
Back
Top