Me too. It's cool and all but who's going to pay $150 for it? And then there's the fact that you have to stand up to use it. Atleast with the Wii you can sit down.[Nook said:,Jun 17 2010, 12:42:12 PM]I can already tell Kinect's going to fail.
But the Eyetoy was only like, 50 bucks.Jas0n said:Me too. It's cool and all but who's going to pay $150 for it? And then there's the fact that you have to stand up to use it. Atleast with the Wii you can sit down.[Nook said:,Jun 17 2010, 12:42:12 PM]I can already tell Kinect's going to fail.
After the initial hype wears off it'll just be like that annoying PS2 eyetoy thing.
Games need an option whether to use motion controls or not. Some people want motion controls, but others don't. I prefer that some games need motion controls and some games don't.Jas0n said:Me too. It's cool and all but who's going to pay $150 for it? And then there's the fact that you have to stand up to use it. Atleast with the Wii you can sit down.[Nook said:,Jun 17 2010, 12:42:12 PM]I can already tell Kinect's going to fail.
After the initial hype wears off it'll just be like that annoying PS2 eyetoy thing.
Lets see what happens when he checks out Chinese pirate companies.OddCrazyMe said:I highly doubt he isn't "amused." I think it's sort of cool that Miyamoto is looking at other company's software.
Good use of proper verb tense.Tyeforce said:*Changes title* XDOddCrazyMe said:I highly doubt he isn't "amused." I think it's sort of cool that Miyamoto is looking at other company's software.
Lol.Muffun said:
OddCrazyMe said:Good use of proper verb tense.Tyeforce said:*Changes title* XDOddCrazyMe said:I highly doubt he isn't "amused." I think it's sort of cool that Miyamoto is looking at other company's software.