Member of the month?

Megamannt125 said:
Lol storm would win everytime since I think he's the most liked member on the forums.
agreed but the thing is that he is the maker of the forums though so he couldnt win everytime
 
akmaruman09 said:
Megamannt125 said:
Lol storm would win everytime since I think he's the most liked member on the forums.
agreed but the thing is that he is the maker of the forums though so he couldnt win everytime
yea but he wouldnt make him self win every tie it would be different ppeople wining each month like noone could win twice
 
lilshortay said:
akmaruman09 said:
Megamannt125 said:
Lol storm would win everytime since I think he's the most liked member on the forums.
agreed but the thing is that he is the maker of the forums though so he couldnt win everytime
yea but he wouldnt make him self win every tie it would be different ppeople wining each month like noone could win twice
hmm you got a point i think i am up for member of the month how about you guys?
 
i mean that it wouldnt hurt to give it a try i mean anythings possible it may even turn out to work out really well and wont cause any problems
 
dragonflamez said:
http://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7027907/1/

That be them.
I'm just saying that we should do them more.
oh man. my mistake, completely bad idea.

there are way too many people on this website at this point, and for there to be awards with winners that not everyone's heard of...? essentially, popularity would win, alliances would be rampant, and there would be more people upset than happy.

it seems like this would otherwise function as a good community building activity, given the right circumstances (i.e., everyone knew each other, small population of people, a less sporadic flow of in-and-out members every day). unfortunately, i think this forum has become something else entirely at this point.

not to mention saboteurs! :gyroidconfused:
 
neverbeenkrissed said:
dragonflamez said:
http://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7027907/1/

That be them.
I'm just saying that we should do them more.
oh man. my mistake, completely bad idea.

there are way too many people on this website at this point, and for there to be awards with winners that not everyone's heard of...? essentially, popularity would win, alliances would be rampant, and there would be more people upset than happy.

it seems like this would otherwise function as a good community building activity, given the right circumstances (i.e., everyone knew each other, small population of people, a less sporadic flow of in-and-out members every day). unfortunately, i think this forum has become something else entirely at this point.

not to mention saboteurs! :gyroidconfused:
I agree...but I wish I didn't.

I hate how we can't have nice things.
 
dragonflamez said:
neverbeenkrissed said:
dragonflamez said:
http://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7027907/1/

That be them.
I'm just saying that we should do them more.
oh man. my mistake, completely bad idea.

there are way too many people on this website at this point, and for there to be awards with winners that not everyone's heard of...? essentially, popularity would win, alliances would be rampant, and there would be more people upset than happy.

it seems like this would otherwise function as a good community building activity, given the right circumstances (i.e., everyone knew each other, small population of people, a less sporadic flow of in-and-out members every day). unfortunately, i think this forum has become something else entirely at this point.

not to mention saboteurs! :gyroidconfused:
I agree...but I wish I didn't.

I hate how we can't have nice things.
lol agreed
 
neverbeenkrissed said:
dragonflamez said:
http://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7027907/1/

That be them.
I'm just saying that we should do them more.
oh man. my mistake, completely bad idea.

there are way too many people on this website at this point, and for there to be awards with winners that not everyone's heard of...? essentially, popularity would win, alliances would be rampant, and there would be more people upset than happy.

it seems like this would otherwise function as a good community building activity, given the right circumstances (i.e., everyone knew each other, small population of people, a less sporadic flow of in-and-out members every day). unfortunately, i think this forum has become something else entirely at this point.

not to mention saboteurs! :gyroidconfused:
Which would have also happened with the Member of the Month idea. However, with the Member Awards, there are more opportunities for people when it comes to being nominated and being voted for. However, you are right, people will try to band together to make sure one specific member won and that another definitely wouldn't.

It's just a shame that there are people who don't want to play fair on the forum...
 
ALTHOUGH.

If there WAS a time for people to band together and vote for victory, it would have happened in the last poll.
And it clearly did not, if you know what I mean.
I think it would work.
 
dragonflamez said:
ALTHOUGH.

If there WAS a time for people to band together and vote for victory, it would have happened in the last poll.
And it clearly did not, if you know what I mean.
I think it would work.
You are right! There may be a chance for that idea to work.
 
Back
Top