all i want is final cut pro 7. im gonna get it at a student price once i get my macbook.Tyeforce said:I wish I had Final Cut Studio... All I have is Final Cut Express. Final Cut Studio has so much more, but it's so expensive... ._.
Tell me about it. I hated the software I had to use in high school. It always crashed. >_>David said:all i want is final cut pro 7. im gonna get it at a student price once i get my macbook.Tyeforce said:I wish I had Final Cut Studio... All I have is Final Cut Express. Final Cut Studio has so much more, but it's so expensive... ._.
im sick of this piece of *censored.2.0* windows joke.
its not that its slow its that its just slow. ive used my friends computer its a top of the time PC, it has like quad core/4gb of ram, good graphics card and everything, yet i had to sit there for 10 min, prerendering a stupid 1 min video clip just so i could play it back without lag, now on mac, it wont even play without prerendering. BUT when you go to prerender it doesnt time at all, its just about instant, and you get flawless playback, its freakin awesome.Tyeforce said:Tell me about it. I hated the software I had to use in high school. It always crashed. >_>David said:all i want is final cut pro 7. im gonna get it at a student price once i get my macbook.Tyeforce said:I wish I had Final Cut Studio... All I have is Final Cut Express. Final Cut Studio has so much more, but it's so expensive... ._.
im sick of this piece of *censored.2.0* windows joke.
It's even better when you brew it with the leaves instead of the grounded up crap in those stupid little bags.Rawburt said:Tea is delicious.
It'd be cheaper to get a high end PC than a low end Mac. I got a comp with a quad core, 8 gb's of RAM, and a high quality graphics card for $700. There's no reason it would be faster or slower on a comp depending on it's OS. OS is mainly for interface, not performance.OS's so have some effect on performance, but it's very minute. Windows 7 only uses 500 mb of RAM to run.David said:its not that its slow its that its just slow. ive used my friends computer its a top of the time PC, it has like quad core/4gb of ram, good graphics card and everything, yet i had to sit there for 10 min, prerendering a stupid 1 min video clip just so i could play it back without lag, now on mac, it wont even play without prerendering. BUT when you go to prerender it doesnt time at all, its just about instant, and you get flawless playback, its freakin awesome.Tyeforce said:Tell me about it. I hated the software I had to use in high school. It always crashed. >_>David said:all i want is final cut pro 7. im gonna get it at a student price once i get my macbook.Tyeforce said:I wish I had Final Cut Studio... All I have is Final Cut Express. Final Cut Studio has so much more, but it's so expensive... ._.
im sick of this piece of *censored.2.0* windows joke.
It'd be cheaper, yes, but it wouldn't be a Mac. He wants to use Final Cut (and I don't blame him, it's the best video editing software out there), which is a Mac application only. Besides, with a Mac you get a great operating system and great hardware. You get what you pay for.Pear said:It'd be cheaper to get a high end PC than a low end Mac. I got a comp with a quad core, 8 gb's of RAM, and a high quality graphics card for $700. There's no reason it would be faster or slower on a comp depending on it's OS. OS is mainly for interface, not performance.OS's so have some effect on performance, but it's very minute. Windows 7 only uses 500 mb of RAM to run.David said:its not that its slow its that its just slow. ive used my friends computer its a top of the time PC, it has like quad core/4gb of ram, good graphics card and everything, yet i had to sit there for 10 min, prerendering a stupid 1 min video clip just so i could play it back without lag, now on mac, it wont even play without prerendering. BUT when you go to prerender it doesnt time at all, its just about instant, and you get flawless playback, its freakin awesome.Tyeforce said:Tell me about it. I hated the software I had to use in high school. It always crashed. >_>David said:Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
well idk if itd be any faster, sony vegas seems to operate slow on all computers, on top of that it still doesnt match up to final cut pro, they use macs and final cut pro for a reason in hollywood movies, they just operate all around faster, with the flawless playback and even very fast renders. i rendered a 45 min video i edited for school, in 10 min on the macds they have there, i did an 8 min video on my own computer and it rendered in 45 minutees. :| if i bought a computer with 8gb of ram itd probably be about the same price as a good macbook. ive only edited once on an older macbook but it seemed pretty good, i was able to handle over an hour of HD footage without and problems at all. in imovie, which imo sucks. but w/e.Pear said:It'd be cheaper to get a high end PC than a low end Mac. I got a comp with a quad core, 8 gb's of RAM, and a high quality graphics card for $700. There's no reason it would be faster or slower on a comp depending on it's OS. OS is mainly for interface, not performance.OS's so have some effect on performance, but it's very minute. Windows 7 only uses 500 mb of RAM to run.David said:its not that its slow its that its just slow. ive used my friends computer its a top of the time PC, it has like quad core/4gb of ram, good graphics card and everything, yet i had to sit there for 10 min, prerendering a stupid 1 min video clip just so i could play it back without lag, now on mac, it wont even play without prerendering. BUT when you go to prerender it doesnt time at all, its just about instant, and you get flawless playback, its freakin awesome.Tyeforce said:Tell me about it. I hated the software I had to use in high school. It always crashed. >_>David said:Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
You are very naive and know very little about computers if you think a PC is just as good for video editing as a Mac, even with less specs a Mac is much better at it.Pear said:It'd be cheaper to get a high end PC than a low end Mac. I got a comp with a quad core, 8 gb's of RAM, and a high quality graphics card for $700. There's no reason it would be faster or slower on a comp depending on it's OS. OS is mainly for interface, not performance.OS's so have some effect on performance, but it's very minute. Windows 7 only uses 500 mb of RAM to run.David said:its not that its slow its that its just slow. ive used my friends computer its a top of the time PC, it has like quad core/4gb of ram, good graphics card and everything, yet i had to sit there for 10 min, prerendering a stupid 1 min video clip just so i could play it back without lag, now on mac, it wont even play without prerendering. BUT when you go to prerender it doesnt time at all, its just about instant, and you get flawless playback, its freakin awesome.Tyeforce said:Tell me about it. I hated the software I had to use in high school. It always crashed. >_>David said:Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
This. Most everyone on here will agree with you that Windows main advantage over Macs is that they are a gaming platform. Whereas the Mac is mainly used by professionals for making movies, photography, etc.Jas0n said:You are very naive and know very little about computers if you think a PC is just as good for video editing as a Mac, even with less specs a Mac is much better at it.Pear said:It'd be cheaper to get a high end PC than a low end Mac. I got a comp with a quad core, 8 gb's of RAM, and a high quality graphics card for $700. There's no reason it would be faster or slower on a comp depending on it's OS. OS is mainly for interface, not performance.OS's so have some effect on performance, but it's very minute. Windows 7 only uses 500 mb of RAM to run.David said:its not that its slow its that its just slow. ive used my friends computer its a top of the time PC, it has like quad core/4gb of ram, good graphics card and everything, yet i had to sit there for 10 min, prerendering a stupid 1 min video clip just so i could play it back without lag, now on mac, it wont even play without prerendering. BUT when you go to prerender it doesnt time at all, its just about instant, and you get flawless playback, its freakin awesome.Tyeforce said:Quoting limited to 4 levels deepalways crashed. >_>
Macs are for Artsy people, windows is for gaming/work. thats what it comes down to.Bacon Boy said:This. Most everyone on here will agree with you that Windows main advantage over Macs is that they are a gaming platform. Whereas the Mac is mainly used by professionals for making movies, photography, etc.Jas0n said:You are very naive and know very little about computers if you think a PC is just as good for video editing as a Mac, even with less specs a Mac is much better at it.Pear said:It'd be cheaper to get a high end PC than a low end Mac. I got a comp with a quad core, 8 gb's of RAM, and a high quality graphics card for $700. There's no reason it would be faster or slower on a comp depending on it's OS. OS is mainly for interface, not performance.OS's so have some effect on performance, but it's very minute. Windows 7 only uses 500 mb of RAM to run.David said:Quoting limited to 4 levels deepalways
But Macs can work just as well as Windows for gaming and work.David said:Macs are for Artsy people, windows is for gaming/work. thats what it comes down to.Bacon Boy said:This. Most everyone on here will agree with you that Windows main advantage over Macs is that they are a gaming platform. Whereas the Mac is mainly used by professionals for making movies, photography, etc.Jas0n said:You are very naive and know very little about computers if you think a PC is just as good for video editing as a Mac, even with less specs a Mac is much better at it.Pear said:Quoting limited to 4 levels deepalways
Oh that's interesting, I've never actually tried it with leaves, don't think I've seen any tea leaves in the supermarket, I'm gonna have to try and find some and see how they taste.Professor Gallows said:It's even better when you brew it with the leaves instead of the grounded up crap in those stupid little bags.Rawburt said:Tea is delicious.
Coffee is like a bitter yumgasmRawburt said:Oh that's interesting, I've never actually tried it with leaves, don't think I've seen any tea leaves in the supermarket, I'm gonna have to try and find some and see how they taste.Professor Gallows said:It's even better when you brew it with the leaves instead of the grounded up crap in those stupid little bags.Rawburt said:Tea is delicious.
Not a big fan of coffee, don't really like the taste of it.Pizza Survivor said:Coffee is like a bitter yumgasmRawburt said:Oh that's interesting, I've never actually tried it with leaves, don't think I've seen any tea leaves in the supermarket, I'm gonna have to try and find some and see how they taste.Professor Gallows said:It's even better when you brew it with the leaves instead of the grounded up crap in those stupid little bags.Rawburt said:Tea is delicious.