How should be my 10th villager? Maple or Fauna?

[J e s s i c a]

I am doing a forest theme for my town Floodway and my picks for my 10th villagers are either Maple or Fauna.
They are both cute and fit into my theme

Or I can kick out Katt and get both but I don't want 3 normals in my town :l my villagers are:

Bill
Molly
O'hare
Carmen
Erik
Deirdre
Katt
Chief
Blaire

so... what should I do?

 

[LoonieToonies]

Hmm, I would usually say Fauna since I think she's better than maple, but at the same time you have a lot of deer. Therefore I say you either kick out one of your deer, or just get maple.

 

[StrawberryCream]

Fauna. Both are cute, but with Fauna being in my town I am slightly biased.

 

[MOON TRIPS]

I'd also say Fauna... I'd even let you have her from my town! XD she's so darn CUTE ;^;
Maple is cute too, but. Fauna. :'>

 

[Millefeui]

Fauna is cuter imo

 

[tumut]

I don't care for either, but i'd say Fauna.

 

[Quill]

Fauna! Maple has a weird face. People love her but... it throws me off.

 

[crossinganimal]

I'd say Maple. I have Fauna right now and she's not a favourite of mine... found a abadoned birdcage in her closet once! She's a animal abuser!! lol jk. But I mean since both are normal just go with your personal taste. Bear or deer? I'd say bear. Maple's cuter. But that's only my opinion.. If you can't decide, take both! It's just a game so go with what you want since you are the one to play it!

 

[peppy villager]

Fauna is prettier and Maple is cuter.

I usually go for pretty > cute when it comes to my female villagers.
Plus I have Fauna in my town and she's awesome. So Fauna~

 

[Vizionari]

I'm being biased, but Maple. Maple and Fauna are both adorable, but I have Maple in my main town and she is really, really adorable :3

 

[Llust]

Fauna. I'm honestly not fond of Maple at all. This is probably just because I've had her in my town since the beginning of the game and I still do, but she's never pinged me to move out before for some reason. I've been wanting to get rid of her, but to be honest I did think she was adorable at first

 

[jobby47]

You should kick out another villager and get both?

 

[J e s s i c a]

bump!

 

[Fairytale]

First, I love your townname. Second, I'd pick Maple. You don't have any little bears yet, mainly tall villagers, deers and bunnies. Maple is very cute, and so kind! She fits in. Maybe you can kick Katt out and get both? However, you already have a normal so that would make 3 normals.

 

[Shimmer]

I'd say Maple. You already have deer in your town so Maple would bring more diversity in your town.

 

[doggaroo]

I choose Fauna only because I don't like bears. Plus, she's adorable!!!

 

[J e s s i c a]

First, I love your townname. Second, I'd pick Maple. You don't have any little bears yet, mainly tall villagers, deers and bunnies. Maple is very cute, and so kind! She fits in. Maybe you can kick Katt out and get both? However, you already have a normal so that would make 3 normals.

Thank you ^.^ It took my forever to pick a name that sounded original XD I am thinking on getting Maple more than Fauna because she is way more cute and plus her I love her colour pattern. However, I had Fauna in my town and feel in love with her But I don't know, I'll wait a bit more and see what people think xx

 

[J e s s i c a]

Ok I have picked what to do! I am kicking out Katt to get both! (mind you, the votes are tied!)

Thank you to everyone that voted!

 

[MatchaMoonlight]

I'd say Fauna. I've always thought she was adorable.

 

[spelling88]

Fauna was one of my starting villagers and i love her so much! she goes perfect in any type of town, so definitely get her. Maple is also very cute, much cuter than Katt, so i recommend getting rid of Katt to get both Maple and Fauna.It may also be objected that my opening remark about the appealing character of Pyrrhonism is wrong or surprising, given that it is not possible for anyone to think that the stance I have presented is attractive and worth adopting. For instance, not only does the Skeptic not promise that the suspensive attitude will certainly make possible the attainment of ataraxia, but he does not even regard this as an aim that is intrinsic to his philosophy. To this objection, I would first reply that the appeal of Skepticism seems to lie in the sort of radical changes that this philosophy may entail in a person’s life. For, if adopted, the cautious Pyrrhonean attitude will prevent one from making rash judgments about any topic that one has not examined or found final answers to, which in turn will prevent one from acting hastily. Another profound change consists in the fact that, even if at some point the Skeptic broke some of the most important moral rules of the society to which he belongs, he would perhaps experience some kind of discomfort, but he would not believe that he has done something objectively wrong. This would free him from the shame and remorse that those who believe that such an action is morally incorrect would experience in the same situation. In sum, the Pyrrhonean philosophy would produce, if adopted, profound changes in a person’s thoughts, feelings, and actions; changes that at first glance seem to be beneficial. But secondly, I think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy cannot in the end be determined a priori. For it depends on whether one values such attitudes as caution, open-mindedness, and intellectual modesty; or, if one does, on whether these attitudes are preferred to, for example, the sense of assurance that one may experience when espousing philosophic systems or religious beliefs. This is why my opening comment was just that Pyrrhonism may still be found attractive and worth adopting.