Faith gets to keep her flower, but not PLUCKY??

Chungus

Freshly Delivered Something Or Other
Joined
May 24, 2020
Posts
515
Bells
881
Orange (Fruit)
April Birthstone (Diamond)
Cherry (Fruit)
Animal_Crossing-e_1-044_%28Faith%29.jpg
Faith_amiibo.png


A cute, wonderful koala was resurrected from the dead. But what about the perfect, precious chicken who was similarly given the sisterly treatment in newer games?

Animal_Crossing-e_1-030_%28Plucky%29.jpg
Plucky_HD.png
225px-Plucky_NH.png


New Leaf was right on the money, but what happened in the transition to New Horizons? Why did they remove Plucky's adorable tropical headpiece? Nintendo, please explain! :cry:
 
I hate that they removed her flower. Plucky is one of my favorite villagers too. :/
 
Why do you think they did that to her design? She just looks depressing now...
 
Not to sound dismissive at all.
But I really don't care.

I dont think the leaf on Plucky changed much about her.

Faith is just a boring koala that skinned another koala and wore their face.
So the flower is something to do with their design.

But really, I don't see much of any difference between Plucky with a leaf on her head and without
 
Ahh, I know, poor Plucky! Her house is even still island-themed in NH, and then she loses the little pop of orange? It's a shame. It may only be a small little bit of orange, but it's a cute accessory that works with her islander design and gives her (character model) a little something to stand out!

My #1 fat chance dream back before the 1.7 update was released was for individual feathers to be wearable by villagers, too. Literally only so I could've given Plucky one and despite being an approximate, it would have worked.
The Festivale accessory works in a pinch but it's too extravagant. 😢
edit: ahh, a typo how embarrassing ;n;
 
Last edited:
Not meaning any disrespect, but why include this in a post to someone that's caring about one of their fave dreamies?
Because they raised it as a discussion point and I'm saying I don't see it as a big deal.

I did not realise that every discussion had to be in full agreement of the OP
 
Because they raised it as a discussion point and I'm saying I don't see it as a big deal.

I did not realise that every discussion had to be in full agreement of the OP

You make a good point. I just thought it sounded a little abrasive. Agree to disagree!
 
Back
Top