stormcommander said:
People are always trying to get attention or make themselves look like some sort of veteran or elite person by saying they don't like something. And I'm not just saying this because of Nintendo. Take Halo for example. How is Halo 2 "better than Halo 3?" (I hear a lot of Halo people say this... funny thing is, is that a lot of them haven't even played the first game)
You need something to back yourself up or you need to be more specific. Let's take AC for example. I might say I like AC (GCN) better than ACWW, but that's because I don't like handheld games in general. Or I might say I think Nintendo could have done a better job. Or I could point out a specific thing and say the fact that there is only one house is more bad than the new-and-improved features are good.
Bul, I would say this is #2 of your list. Except it's like Hateboy... opposite of fanboy. While a fanboy is obsessed with saying how great a game is for no valid reason, a "hateboy" (heh) is obsessed with saying how much it sucks for no apparent reason. And they might compare it to their favorite as well.
Excellent post, I totally agree. Apparently it's "cool" to hate on the classics. Ocarina of Time, Super Mario 64, you name it... a lot of these games are getting a surprising amount of hate lately, and for no apparent reason.
Or how about all that Twilight Princess hate? First it was the Holy Grail, and then it was "the worst Zelda ever"? Makes no sense to me...
Personally, I like AC GCN better than ACWW, and I can also back myself up.
a) the frame-rate was lower in ACWW (hovering near 25fps compared to AC GCN's I think 60), resulting in a lot of "lag" even in singleplayer
b) furniture limitations in house
c) it was on a handheld, I prefer console games
d) they cut out NES games, and some of my favorite furniture items
etc.
So yeah. If someone wants to say something, especially something inflammatory, they gotta be prepared to back themselves up.