
Even then, I don't like to see complete *censored.2.0* for threads. I like my mind to be stimulated.Tyeforce said:OR... Just put it in Brewster's.
http://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=251214/Fabioisonfire said:Even then, I don't like to see complete *censored.2.0* for threads. I like my mind to be stimulated.Tyeforce said:OR... Just put it in Brewster's.
I didn't join this forums to be all intelligent and stuff, I already have to do that at school. >_<Fabioisonfire said:intelligentOrange said:Explain intelligent.Fabioisonfire said:Could this topic create any intelligent discussion?
adj.
1. Having intelligence.
2. Having a high degree of intelligence; mentally acute.
3. Showing sound judgment and rationality: an intelligent decision; an intelligent solution to the problem.
4. Appealing to the intellect; intellectual: a film with witty and intelligent dialogue.
5. Computer Science. Having certain data storage and processing capabilities: an intelligent terminal; intelligent peripherals.
Yes, becasue being intelligent is a bad thing. You should only be intelligent when someone forces you to.Orange said:I didn't join this forums to be all intelligent and stuff, I already have to do that at school. >_<Fabioisonfire said:intelligentOrange said:Explain intelligent.Fabioisonfire said:Could this topic create any intelligent discussion?
adj.
1. Having intelligence.
2. Having a high degree of intelligence; mentally acute.
3. Showing sound judgment and rationality: an intelligent decision; an intelligent solution to the problem.
4. Appealing to the intellect; intellectual: a film with witty and intelligent dialogue.
5. Computer Science. Having certain data storage and processing capabilities: an intelligent terminal; intelligent peripherals.
Um, of course you should think before you make every single post...DirtyD said:But at the same time you shouldnt have to make people think with EVERY single post. Yes I agree some posts and threads should stick with intelligent material only, but I think there has to be a place where we dont have to worry about that.
Oh right, I read that wrong... >_>DirtyD said:Yes every post should have thought behind it. But that isnt what I said.
I said, you shouldnt have to make OTHERS think with every post you make