• The New Horizons 3.0 update is here and we're hosting an eShop gift card giveaway! Each participant will also earn up to 60 forum bells. To participate, visit the event thread in the New Horizons board here. Good luck!

Article

Bacon Boy said:
-Niko said:
Bacon Boy said:
Rawburt said:
Bacon Boy said:
Tye... The playstation came way before Nintendo. And I think it was sega that made the first home console and then Sony picked up on it and made a console. The most successful console was the ps2. It lasted for so long. And it was out before nintendo got into the competition. So really, thank sega and Sony. >:/
Wut, Nintendo came out before Sony did for over a decade, and the first successful home console was made by Atari.
Wasn't that an arcade system? I meant something about the ones where you can swap discs and stuff. Plus, Nintendo wasn't into gaming when they first started.
Oh, I see what you mean. The Atari did have some Arcade ports, and most games were like games you could find in an arcade, but I thought it was considered a home console :O .
Yay! You get what I'm saying! :)
Arcade ports or not, the 2600 is a video game console.

@ Coma: Indeed.
 
Comatose said:
Nintendo has published some amazing games, you have to admit.
Yep. I pretty much adore the Mario series, but that's probably because I pretty much grew up playing a lot of Mario games :P .
 
Tyeforce said:
You guys are missing the point of this... I wasn't trying to say "Nintendo is best, period, end of discussion, don't talk to me." I was just pointing out an article that tells the greatness of Nintendo, since there seem to be so many Nintendo basher here (ironically, at an Animal Crossing forum >_>). Obviously, in my opinion, Nintendo will always be the greatest video game company to me. And the author of the article agrees. But that's not the point. The point was to point out the differences between Nintendo and the other companies when it comes to things like having the most successful franchises, more durable hardware, reviving the video game industry (you wouldn't have your Xboxes and PlayStations if it weren't for Nintendo), appeal to all ages, and developing new, fun, innovative ways to play.
If the crap Ninty's shoveling out is "innovative" and "fun", I'll take rehashed and boring any day.
 
-Niko said:
Comatose said:
Nintendo has published some amazing games, you have to admit.
Yep. I pretty much adore the Mario series, but that's probably because I pretty much grew up playing a lot of Mario games :P .
yEa. But he has so much more potential. Why nintendo, why are you so underqted on your games?
 
Bacon Boy said:
Tye... The playstation came way before Nintendo. And I think it was sega that made the first home console and then Sony picked up on it and made a console. The most successful console was the ps2. It lasted for so long. And it was out before nintendo got into the competition. So really, thank sega and Sony. >:/
Wat. Lol. You need to study your gaming history. Nintendo has been around since 1889, and the TV Color Game (Nintendo's first ever video game system) was made in 1977, long before the PlayStation, which was released in 1994. In fact, Nintendo had originally teamed up with Sony to make a new disc-based console, but the partnership well through and Sony finished the project and created the PlayStation. So, in a way, the PlayStation is partly Nintendo's creation. Anyway, Atari killed the video game industry with bad games like E.T., and if it weren't for Nintendo and the Famicom/NES, the Famicom Robot/R.O.B., and Super Mario Bros., gaming very likely wouldn't have picked up again, or if it did it would be much later in the future, and things would be much different than they are today. So, really, thank Nintendo.
 
Jak said:
Tyeforce said:
You guys are missing the point of this... I wasn't trying to say "Nintendo is best, period, end of discussion, don't talk to me." I was just pointing out an article that tells the greatness of Nintendo, since there seem to be so many Nintendo basher here (ironically, at an Animal Crossing forum >_>). Obviously, in my opinion, Nintendo will always be the greatest video game company to me. And the author of the article agrees. But that's not the point. The point was to point out the differences between Nintendo and the other companies when it comes to things like having the most successful franchises, more durable hardware, reviving the video game industry (you wouldn't have your Xboxes and PlayStations if it weren't for Nintendo), appeal to all ages, and developing new, fun, innovative ways to play.
If the crap Ninty's shoveling out is "innovative" and "fun", I'll take rehashed and boring any day.
It is innovative and fun. >_> Maybe it's not for everyone, but I'll admit that I've had more fun with the Wii than any other console. Using motion controls is so much more fun than just pressing buttons.
 
Wait wait wait. I thought you said that staring started everything. If they started everything, how did they screw it up?
 
Tyeforce said:
Bacon Boy said:
Tye... The playstation came way before Nintendo. And I think it was sega that made the first home console and then Sony picked up on it and made a console. The most successful console was the ps2. It lasted for so long. And it was out before nintendo got into the competition. So really, thank sega and Sony. >:/
Wat. Lol. You need to study your gaming history. Nintendo has been around since 1889, and the TV Color Game (Nintendo's first ever video game system) was made in 1977, long before the PlayStation, which was released in 1994. In fact, Nintendo had originally teamed up with Sony to make a new disc-based console, but the partnership well through and Sony finished the project and created the PlayStation. So, in a way, the PlayStation is partly Nintendo's creation. Anyway, Atari killed the video game industry with bad games like E.T., and if it weren't for Nintendo and the Famicom/NES, the Famicom Robot/R.O.B., and Super Mario Bros., gaming very likely wouldn't have picked up again, or if it did it would be much later in the future, and things would be much different than they are today. So, really, thank Nintendo.
I would like proof of this 'fact' i have underlined.
 
Neko Yuki Pyrozanryu said:
Tyeforce said:
Bacon Boy said:
Tye... The playstation came way before Nintendo. And I think it was sega that made the first home console and then Sony picked up on it and made a console. The most successful console was the ps2. It lasted for so long. And it was out before nintendo got into the competition. So really, thank sega and Sony. >:/
Wat. Lol. You need to study your gaming history. Nintendo has been around since 1889, and the TV Color Game (Nintendo's first ever video game system) was made in 1977, long before the PlayStation, which was released in 1994. In fact, Nintendo had originally teamed up with Sony to make a new disc-based console, but the partnership well through and Sony finished the project and created the PlayStation. So, in a way, the PlayStation is partly Nintendo's creation. Anyway, Atari killed the video game industry with bad games like E.T., and if it weren't for Nintendo and the Famicom/NES, the Famicom Robot/R.O.B., and Super Mario Bros., gaming very likely wouldn't have picked up again, or if it did it would be much later in the future, and things would be much different than they are today. So, really, thank Nintendo.
I would like proof of this 'fact' i have underlined.
Nintendo was originally a card company, but evolved into a gaming company.
 
They need a new Luigi game, where...

<div class='spoiler_toggle'>Spoiler: click to toggle</div><div class="spoiler" style="display:none;">He's the pope. 8D</div>
 
Ahe hem, my first game system ever was a sega genesis, but I had friends with a SNES or NES and still played those a decent amount. I updated my systems when needed but I always loved games and the potential they hold, both then and the ever more realistic games that can be made now. There is one thing in this article that I absolutely agree with Nintendo has always made some of the best hardware, delivering what they said they would with a durability topped by no one.

Behold how the gamecube dominated the ps2 and xbox

Nintendo might not have the best hardware specs, but they are great at knowing what is a good amount for the time. The Wii though underpowered compared to the others, was the only one making money off console sales at launch, and was still cheaper! My Wii has worked perfectly since launch, though I have had a friend, or 7 witha failed xbox 360.

As far as games go, Nintendo has unfortunately alienated 3rd parties from their system. This is mainly a result of Nintendo games being too good. Glitches are hard to find on Nintendo games, camera angles are normally as good as they get. If I had a nickle for everytime I got annoyed at the camera in sonic adventure, I would have a lot of nickles, and yet I never remember such frustration in say ocarina of time, a game before Sonic Adventure. Some Nintendo games have become a formula, but at the same time Nintendo has been the company behind most major advancements in anything with gaming. Do some things fail? Yes but somethings revolutionize the industry. From the first 3d console games, to the D pad, to their new controller (that both other companies are copying fyi).

This brings me to Miyamoto, he is a man I idolize, he is still young at heart over so many years and still occasionally gets out an amazing and new game. Pikmin was amazing! It was just soo much fun for me, and it was done in a fairly creative style. He made entire worlds of intrigue with characters as memorable as Micky Mouse if not more so.

By no means does it mean it is always at the top nor always makes the right ideas, the point is they know when to adapt something new. That is why they survive and still have profits out the wazoo. Yes they keep making new games that seem to copy old ones of theirs rather often, but every so often a game sparks into existence from them that changes the face of gaming. Lately a lot of repeats are because they sell extremely well among a demographic they finally got gaming. They expanded their base and yes it has upset those who claim to be "hard core", but they will return because soon their new demographic will also be "hard core", and then that will be what is profitable for them again.
 
Back
Top