visibleghost
ʕ •̀ o •́ ʔ
Only one. Asexuality.
nah imo it would need more than these, other and asexual because there are a ton of sexualities and they could at least have added some more rly common ones like pan, gray, ace, etc
Only one. Asexuality.
lol K nice 2 hear ur aphobic opinions but alrightPan- and ace- identifying people are not actually "really common" as has been insinuated here...? But yeah I would add those as options nonetheless. Wouldn't bother with "grey-ace" or "demi" or any of that crap tbh. I genuinely detest the split-attraction model and the naming of new sexualities based solely on sex drive.
Bi here.
Pan- and ace- identifying people are not actually "really common" as has been insinuated here...? But yeah I would add those as options nonetheless. Wouldn't bother with "grey-ace" or "demi" or any of that crap tbh. I genuinely detest the split-attraction model and the naming of new sexualities based solely on sex drive.
Bi here.
lol K nice 2 hear ur aphobic opinions but alright
n imo they r common identities lmao
What about a "questioning" option?