Auction 5IVs timid Zapdos! Kalos caught!

[Kyuby]

got one of these little fellas wandering around my pc box so I dont need him =)

INFO

Zapdos
Timid
31/xx/31/31/31/31

Korean region

Intial bid: 200 TBT

min increase 25 TBT

BO: 500

 

[TheWonky]

Where do you get all these 5iv rare pokes o.o

 

[Sawyer2030]

Where do you get all these 5iv rare pokes o.o

Exactly what I was thinking... There's no way that you could get that good of a non breed able Pok?mon...

 

[Kyuby]

Its all about luck :3, you know whenever you catch a legendary it will have random Ivs and nature, if you're lucky enought you will get one like this one =), I also have a japanese 5IVs timid Yveltal and a German 5Ivs Modest Xerneas

 

[Kyuby]

bump

 

[Kyuby]

bump

 

[Flyffel]

Its all about luck :3, you know whenever you catch a legendary it will have random Ivs and nature, if you're lucky enought you will get one like this one =), I also have a japanese 5IVs timid Yveltal and a German 5Ivs Modest Xerneas

They asked where you got them from. ;P

 

[Kyuby]

Oh, Trading from the reddedit =)

 

[BlueWyvern4]

you could also use RNG Abuse ^^

 

[Kyuby]

I don't really know what RNG means hahaha

 

[Flyffel]

There is yet no RNG abuse for XY.

 

[BlueWyvern4]

There is. Just not for legends. And my statement didn't pertain to that.

'Pseudo-RNG Abuse' anyways.

 

[Kyuby]

still dont know what yo guys are talking about hahaha, do you guys reckon it might be hacked?

 

[BlueWyvern4]

No no, I was just being a bit silly in upholding my argument. (But, it is correct.) But I don't think this is hacked.

 

[ShinySandwich]

all legendaries in xy have at least 3 perfect ivs so its easier to get a 5iv pokemon, not that easy tho

 

[BlueWyvern4]

Also, ill bid 200 TBT

 

[Flyffel]

Pofer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mQn8W9HZbk

BlueWyvern4:
http://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/do-not-ask-about-xy-rng-abuse.3489811/
http://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/read-this-wi-fi-rules-and-thread-index.3490704/
"No, XY RNG is not possible. It may never be possible. Don't ask about it."

 

[BlueWyvern4]

Flyfell, I said Pseudo-RNG Abuse, which is technically still RNG Abuse.\

If you want to keep on arguing about it PM me, I think we should stop polluting this guys thread.

http://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/some-sort-of-egg-rng-abuse-read-the-first-post.3491324/

Also, 'possible' does not mean we have info of it yet, Possible is
able to be done; within the power or capacity of someone or something.
or
a person or thing that has the potential to become or do something, especially a potential candidate for a job or membership on a team.


In our case it is the former. Just because we have no info on how to do it doesn't mean it's not possible. Even if it's coded to be impossible, it can't be proved as such-you can prove X exists by showing someone X, but you can't prove X doesn't exist just because we don't see X. There's still the *possibility* that it could happen, even in an insane scenario. I.E. Some mastermind organization figures out how to hack into games and edit the code to somehow ruin their lives. Possible.
*waits for PM response*

 

[Flyffel]

You don't even need the egg trick for good eggs.
Exactly, RNG abuse is at the moment not possible. It means that RNG abuse, at the moment, is not possible. (DUH!)
You said: "you could also use RNG Abuse ^^"
I said: "There is yet no RNG abuse for XY."
Why do you keep arguing when you were wrong... :|

Free bump.

 

[BlueWyvern4]

You don't even need the egg trick for good eggs.
Exactly, RNG abuse is at the moment not possible. It means that RNG abuse, at the moment, is not possible. (DUH!)
You said: "you could also use RNG Abuse ^^"
I said: "There is yet no RNG abuse for XY."
Why do you keep arguing when you were wrong... :|

Free bump.

Maybe because I'm not wrong? If anyone is obstinate, it's you.Even if you don't need that trick for it, it's still possible..

And it is possible. I don't know why you think it isn't. We just haven't discovered it yet. It might be near impossible, but you can't prove it.

'I said: "There is yet no RNG abuse for XY."'
Your argument is invalid because there is.
You didn't address my argument at all, and ignored my explanation.

'You said: "you could also use RNG Abuse ^^"'
Again, this did not pertain to legendaries, so therefor, it is correct, as there exists RNG Abuse, even if Pseudo-RNG Abuse for eggs.

BTW, I won't be back for a while. So if I don't respond for a while, I have not given up the argument.