PurplPanda
not at disneyworld
This was in irc mafia.
*Purpl
I wasn't hardcore pressuring him?????
I most likely will not be active tomorrow, but today I will be.
-
We're Celebrating Diversity on TBT! Join our new mini-event this month by making a 3D craft that represents what diversity and inclusivity mean to you. For your hard work, you'll receive a newly released villager collectible and the chance to win the latest addition to our plush series! See the Celebrating Diversity 2024 thread to get started.
-
Animal Crossing Hide & Seek sessions from The Bell Tree World Championship are coming back -- check out the new TBT Neighbourly Hide and Seek thread here for details! Look out for an Among Us session here too.
Mafia Pleasure Cruise Mini Mafia VIII [Game Over/Mafia Win]
- Thread starter KarlaKGB
- Start date
I wasn't hardcore pressuring him?????
I most likely will not be active tomorrow, but today I will be.
Superpenguin
Penguins! <3
Well, I mean you did say that was your idea for mafia kills/ Plus it seemed like a pretty unique idea that really only you have ever shown to have/ Also, you haven't been that big of a contributor to conversation lately/ In a game without PMs, it is kind of expected for players who use PMs a lot to communicate will have much more to discuss within the thread/
Do I think you're scum just from all of that? No, but it's just something I've been noticing/
Andelsky
Princess McCormick
Again as I told Lauren
Sorry I should of worded it better. The only ones who talked to him were; Purpl, Alise and Lauren.. And Oath questioned why he wouldn't reveal his information twice I believe it was.
Don't get so defensive guys.xD
oath2order
#Porygon2024
Yeah I know Ive been inactiveish but why would I do the tactic that I mentioned scum should do at the end of a previous game? Bad wording I know but i hope you get what im saying
I never said for him to reveal his evidence, didn't you say I didn't post after the night or something? I apologize for not writing a longer thing and defense on your case on me, kind of wrapped up in my game..heh...I'll read later, also r.i.p Cory. I actually wonder who his case was on.
Superpenguin
Penguins! <3
Cause that's a tactic that works for you, so why not?
oath2order
#Porygon2024
Ive never done it though I think
Superpenguin
Penguins! <3
I want to go back to the apparent missing shot. We still don't know how Mafia KP is determined this game, but I think it's safe to safe lynching Alice didn't cause a drop in it.
Protected players this game won't get notified they are protected, so only the protectors have that information. Personally, I think it's important for the protector to out themself along with whom they successfully protected, at least out it at the right time. It's a way to give us clears on players. And I also believe if the protector is like a one-shot protection role or something similar to where they are practically powerless now, they should just out now. I also recommend any remaining Detectives to out a guilty report right when they get it.
Of course you guys may have different ideas, so thoughts on these ideas?
Also, for the lynch, I would recommend PurplPanda due to him defending Alice and favoring a lynch on Ashtot. The only thing that throws me off of Blu Rose right now is the stolen vote event. However, I don't think it'd be unheard of if the vote stealer is a mafia role, that they'd steal a vote from a fellow scum player.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Also wouldn't be against a lynch on Olive.
Protected players this game won't get notified they are protected, so only the protectors have that information. Personally, I think it's important for the protector to out themself along with whom they successfully protected, at least out it at the right time. It's a way to give us clears on players. And I also believe if the protector is like a one-shot protection role or something similar to where they are practically powerless now, they should just out now. I also recommend any remaining Detectives to out a guilty report right when they get it.
Of course you guys may have different ideas, so thoughts on these ideas?
Also, for the lynch, I would recommend PurplPanda due to him defending Alice and favoring a lynch on Ashtot. The only thing that throws me off of Blu Rose right now is the stolen vote event. However, I don't think it'd be unheard of if the vote stealer is a mafia role, that they'd steal a vote from a fellow scum player.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Also wouldn't be against a lynch on Olive.
PurplPanda
not at disneyworld
The only reason I thought we should have lynched Ashtot was because his role was one use, and I didn't know Alice's role.
I did not favor a lynch on Ashtot. That was me posting my thoughts; I didn't even vote for either.
Superpenguin
Penguins! <3
That's honestly the most scummy thing ever. "Let's just lynch Ashtot cause his role is done now. He's worthless. Alice is better to keep around because she could be green, blue, or red. Guess we won't know, though!"
Superpenguin
Penguins! <3
He actively tried to get votes on you, yes, but PurplPanda and Olive showed resistance in voting Alice and would rather vote you.
I back the lynch on blue rose, as said in my post earlier about blue and purpl
- - - Post Merge - - -
When did i show resistance?
But that's a great reason for scum to try and steer votes away from their scummate - by hoping to get people to feel too unsure of Alice's role and instead just vote for Ashtot, even though he was confirmed town. That, in my opinion, is very scummy.
And like I've already stated, I find it really fishy you and Blu Rose both showed hesitance to vote Alice and preferred voting someone nearly confirmed town.
Not that ironic if he was about to reveal something about someone. Sounds intentional...
oath2order
#Porygon2024
I think this is probably what got Cory killed. I'm not really sure who "that person" is supposed to be, but he was originally quoting Lauren and Lauren had quoted Purpl and Blu Rose.
oath2order
#Porygon2024
That kind of makes me a little suspicious of Purpl and Blu Rose then, since he was responding to Lauren saying something in the first one, and me in the second.
