What villagers do you think should be on a higher/lower tier?

[erikaeliseh]

i think for the most part the villager tiers are pretty accurate, but i do think a few villagers have increased/decreased in popularit lately, for example julian seem like he should be on tier one to me, same with flurry. Also i think kidcat has decreased in popularity.

 

[Royce]

peanut and apple and ruby should be higher

 

[Shiny Spritzee]

Flurry and Julian should be tier one. Apple and Hamlet should be slightly higher up. And personally, I would like to see Mint and Soleil moved a bit higher.

 

[kiti_in_wonderland]

To be honest, I think there just shouldn't be tiers anymore since each villager is valuable in its own way. Yeah there should be a set price for all villagers, like nothing over 400 tbt (even though I think that's to high still) but I think the tier system has just allowed people to abuse the power when they own a villager. Like some people who have Beau "tier 1" think it means they can take as much tbt as they want ><

 

[tokkio]

genji is the best villager ever the dreamie of all dreamies he should be in tier 1 he's the number of tier 1 numero uno the top tomato the perfect potato the best of the best


hahah jk honestly i dont even like how the villagers in tiers lmao

 

[jax1234]

I used the tiers when trading a villager, but not to get the highest price, just to understand if they should be put up for free or not.

 

[ams]

I've made tons of bells off the tier system so it would be stupid of me to complain.

I don't follow current trades too closely, but I'm giving a little shoutout to my girl Melba. Everyone seems to agree she's cute and I've seen quite a few people looking for her. Tier 5 seems a little harsh.

 

[Biskit11]

To be honest my opinion should be,

Biskit-Number 15 of tier three
Walker-Number 16 of tier three
Bones-Bumber 10 of tier four
Lucky-Number 14 of tier one

 

[ibelleS]

Filbert should permanently be #1