violence games?

[AnimalCrossingcool]

Do you think violence is bad or good?
P.S.Pretend that the poll is Do you think violence is bad or good? Thank you!

 

[Megamannt125]

I don't care.

 

[The Sign Painter]

I don't care.

 

[Ricano]

It can't be all about the violence, but if it does have, it makes the game look a bit more real.

 

[MitchL21]

dunt care

 

[Pear]

I don't care, <small><small><small><small>too bad my mom does</small></small></small></small> as long as it's not over the top and distasteful. coughmanhunt2cough

 

[Wish]

I will lock this topic for a reason[Only for Mods]

 

[-Aaron]

If it's too over the top that it becomes funny, no. I don't mind at all.

 

[Megamannt125]

But in all seriousness, I don't have a problem with violence in games at all, I am against violence in real life though because I wish we'd all get along, but I use violent video games as an outlet rather than being violent or angry in real life, and I think that could be a good use for violent games and movies.

 

[Pear]

*adding to previous post*

I don't have a problem with violence, as long as the games content rating acts accordingly.

 

[Megamannt125]

*adding to previous post*

I don't have a problem with violence, as long as the games content rating acts accordingly.

Ratings don't work. Parents like to disregard them and then blame the games because of the violence.
I remember watching something on fox a while back where they were talking about this, and the game company was talking about the ratings, and the news reporter was like "yeah but you have to actually read the rating and what it's rated for".
If you actually care about what your child plays then *censored.3.0*ing read the back of the case instead of being a bad parent.

 

[Ciaran]

If violence adds to the game I dont mind it, after all its only a game.

 

[Pear]

*adding to previous post*

I don't have a problem with violence, as long as the games content rating acts accordingly.

Ratings don't work. Parents like to disregard them and then blame the games because of the violence.
I remember watching something on fox a while back where they were talking about this, and the game company was talking about the ratings, and the news reporter was like "yeah but you have to actually read the rating and what it's rated for".
If you actually care about what your child plays then *censored.3.0*ing read the back of the case instead of being a bad parent.

Those rating don't have to be followed super strictly. For instance, if a kid is responsible and his parent know the game won't make him violent, it should be allowed. On the other hand, if it's a kid who gets violent or irritable around violent games, the parents might make him wait a while. The point is, ratings are a guideline, not written in stone.

 

[Megamannt125]

*adding to previous post*

I don't have a problem with violence, as long as the games content rating acts accordingly.

Ratings don't work. Parents like to disregard them and then blame the games because of the violence.
I remember watching something on fox a while back where they were talking about this, and the game company was talking about the ratings, and the news reporter was like "yeah but you have to actually read the rating and what it's rated for".
If you actually care about what your child plays then *censored.3.0*ing read the back of the case instead of being a bad parent.

Those rating don't have to be followed super strictly. For instance, if a kid is responsible and his parent know the game won't make him violent, it should be allowed. On the other hand, if it's a kid who gets violent or irritable around violent games, the parents might make him wait a while. The point is, ratings are a guideline, not written in stone.

I know i'm just saying, the rating system is srs buisness, if you don't know your kid isn't good with violent games and get him one without thinking it through, you can never go back, if you try taking away their xbox they will attempt to kill you.

 

[Ricano]

*adding to previous post*

I don't have a problem with violence, as long as the games content rating acts accordingly.

Ratings don't work. Parents like to disregard them and then blame the games because of the violence.
I remember watching something on fox a while back where they were talking about this, and the game company was talking about the ratings, and the news reporter was like "yeah but you have to actually read the rating and what it's rated for".
If you actually care about what your child plays then *censored.3.0*ing read the back of the case instead of being a bad parent.

Those rating don't have to be followed super strictly. For instance, if a kid is responsible and his parent know the game won't make him violent, it should be allowed. On the other hand, if it's a kid who gets violent or irritable around violent games, the parents might make him wait a while. The point is, ratings are a guideline, not written in stone.

I know i'm just saying, the rating system is srs buisness, if you don't know your kid isn't good with violent games and get him one without thinking it through, you can never go back, if you try taking away their xbox they will attempt to kill you.

I think that actually happened when some kids' parents took away his Halo game or something, and he killed them

 

[Pear]

*adding to previous post*

I don't have a problem with violence, as long as the games content rating acts accordingly.

Ratings don't work. Parents like to disregard them and then blame the games because of the violence.
I remember watching something on fox a while back where they were talking about this, and the game company was talking about the ratings, and the news reporter was like "yeah but you have to actually read the rating and what it's rated for".
If you actually care about what your child plays then *censored.3.0*ing read the back of the case instead of being a bad parent.

Those rating don't have to be followed super strictly. For instance, if a kid is responsible and his parent know the game won't make him violent, it should be allowed. On the other hand, if it's a kid who gets violent or irritable around violent games, the parents might make him wait a while. The point is, ratings are a guideline, not written in stone.

I know i'm just saying, the rating system is srs buisness, if you don't know your kid isn't good with violent games and get him one without thinking it through, you can never go back, if you try taking away their xbox they will attempt to kill you.

Exactly my thoughts.

 

[Megamannt125]

*adding to previous post*

I don't have a problem with violence, as long as the games content rating acts accordingly.

Ratings don't work. Parents like to disregard them and then blame the games because of the violence.
I remember watching something on fox a while back where they were talking about this, and the game company was talking about the ratings, and the news reporter was like "yeah but you have to actually read the rating and what it's rated for".
If you actually care about what your child plays then *censored.3.0*ing read the back of the case instead of being a bad parent.

Those rating don't have to be followed super strictly. For instance, if a kid is responsible and his parent know the game won't make him violent, it should be allowed. On the other hand, if it's a kid who gets violent or irritable around violent games, the parents might make him wait a while. The point is, ratings are a guideline, not written in stone.

I know i'm just saying, the rating system is srs buisness, if you don't know your kid isn't good with violent games and get him one without thinking it through, you can never go back, if you try taking away their xbox they will attempt to kill you.

I think that actually happened when some kids' parents took away his Halo game or something, and he killed them

Where do you think I got that from? XD

 

[Ricano]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Those rating don't have to be followed super strictly. For instance, if a kid is responsible and his parent know the game won't make him violent, it should be allowed. On the other hand, if it's a kid who gets violent or irritable around violent games, the parents might make him wait a while. The point is, ratings are a guideline, not written in stone.

I know i'm just saying, the rating system is srs buisness, if you don't know your kid isn't good with violent games and get him one without thinking it through, you can never go back, if you try taking away their xbox they will attempt to kill you.

I think that actually happened when some kids' parents took away his Halo game or something, and he killed them

Where do you think I got that from? XD

And now he's probably in jail, not playing his game and being parentless.

 

[Megamannt125]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

I know i'm just saying, the rating system is srs buisness, if you don't know your kid isn't good with violent games and get him one without thinking it through, you can never go back, if you try taking away their xbox they will attempt to kill you.

I think that actually happened when some kids' parents took away his Halo game or something, and he killed them

Where do you think I got that from? XD

And now he's probably in jail, not playing his game and being parentless.

I BLAME THE VIDYA GAME!!!!111

 

[Bacon Boy]

*adding to previous post*

I don't have a problem with violence, as long as the games content rating acts accordingly.

Ratings don't work. Parents like to disregard them and then blame the games because of the violence.
I remember watching something on fox a while back where they were talking about this, and the game company was talking about the ratings, and the news reporter was like "yeah but you have to actually read the rating and what it's rated for".
If you actually care about what your child plays then *censored.3.0*ing read the back of the case instead of being a bad parent.

This.

Depends on the violence. If it's sickening, then I can't stand it. I'll get sick. But games like Halo, The Conduit, Call of Duty are fine with me.