Very bad Spirit Tracks commercial

[Jas0n]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Controls, Graphics, Gameplay.

Is what they're judging it on.

Every Zelda game has similar gameplay.
Every game series has similar gameplay
You guys were just disappointed by PH, and won't let Spirit Tracks heal those wounds.

No I wasn't disappointed with PH, as I knew it was terrible before it even came out, and the same goes for ST.

You can't truly know that a game is bad until you play it for yourself. I actually really enjoyed Phantom Hourglass, and it looks like Spirit Tracks will be a lot better.

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

 

[Megamannt125]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Every Zelda game has similar gameplay.
Every game series has similar gameplay
You guys were just disappointed by PH, and won't let Spirit Tracks heal those wounds.

No I wasn't disappointed with PH, as I knew it was terrible before it even came out, and the same goes for ST.

You can't truly know that a game is bad until you play it for yourself. I actually really enjoyed Phantom Hourglass, and it looks like Spirit Tracks will be a lot better.

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

Go watch the review like Tye said, that's a non Nintendo source saying the game is good.

 

[Rawburt]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

No I wasn't disappointed with PH, as I knew it was terrible before it even came out, and the same goes for ST.

You can't truly know that a game is bad until you play it for yourself. I actually really enjoyed Phantom Hourglass, and it looks like Spirit Tracks will be a lot better.

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

Go watch the review like Tye said, that's a non Nintendo source saying the game is good.

Just because there are good reviews doesn't mean people will enjoy it. Like with me, while it may be a good game, it fails to spark interest with me, so I won't be buying it.

 

[Gnome]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

No I wasn't disappointed with PH, as I knew it was terrible before it even came out, and the same goes for ST.

You can't truly know that a game is bad until you play it for yourself. I actually really enjoyed Phantom Hourglass, and it looks like Spirit Tracks will be a lot better.

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

Go watch the review like Tye said, that's a non Nintendo source saying the game is good.

It's GT, a major source though.

I won't rest until I see a small independent reviewer.

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Every Zelda game has similar gameplay.
Every game series has similar gameplay
You guys were just disappointed by PH, and won't let Spirit Tracks heal those wounds.

No I wasn't disappointed with PH, as I knew it was terrible before it even came out, and the same goes for ST.

You can't truly know that a game is bad until you play it for yourself. I actually really enjoyed Phantom Hourglass, and it looks like Spirit Tracks will be a lot better.

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

What "flaws" are you seeing? >_>

 

[Jas0n]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

No I wasn't disappointed with PH, as I knew it was terrible before it even came out, and the same goes for ST.

You can't truly know that a game is bad until you play it for yourself. I actually really enjoyed Phantom Hourglass, and it looks like Spirit Tracks will be a lot better.

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

Go watch the review like Tye said, that's a non Nintendo source saying the game is good.

I did, and I'm still not impressed.

Besides, they didn't exactly say it was good.

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

You can't truly know that a game is bad until you play it for yourself. I actually really enjoyed Phantom Hourglass, and it looks like Spirit Tracks will be a lot better.

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

Go watch the review like Tye said, that's a non Nintendo source saying the game is good.

I did, and I'm still not impressed.

Besides, they didn't exactly say it was good.

Yes they did... The only thing that they said wasn't too great was the first hour, but the game picks up after that.

 

[Jas0n]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

No I wasn't disappointed with PH, as I knew it was terrible before it even came out, and the same goes for ST.

You can't truly know that a game is bad until you play it for yourself. I actually really enjoyed Phantom Hourglass, and it looks like Spirit Tracks will be a lot better.

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

What "flaws" are you seeing? >_>

I never said that I saw any flaws, I just said that all the flaws are hidden on trailers, etc which they do on purpose to make people buy the game, but if they fail to impress even when hiding those flaws then it can't be too good.

And don't say that it doesn't have any flaws, everything since the dawn of man has had flaws.

 

[Megamannt125]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

You can't truly know that a game is bad until you play it for yourself. I actually really enjoyed Phantom Hourglass, and it looks like Spirit Tracks will be a lot better.

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

Go watch the review like Tye said, that's a non Nintendo source saying the game is good.

I did, and I'm still not impressed.

Besides, they didn't exactly say it was good.

Ok, then go read the hands-on look over at IGN, who are also praising the game.

 

[Rawburt]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

Go watch the review like Tye said, that's a non Nintendo source saying the game is good.

I did, and I'm still not impressed.

Besides, they didn't exactly say it was good.

Ok, then go read the hands-on look over at IGN, who are also praising the game.

lol, he's not gonna change his mind. Just accept some people won't like it.

 

[Megamannt125]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

You can't truly know that a game is bad until you play it for yourself. I actually really enjoyed Phantom Hourglass, and it looks like Spirit Tracks will be a lot better.

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

What "flaws" are you seeing? >_>

I never said that I saw any flaws, I just said that all the flaws are hidden on trailers, etc which they do on purpose to make people buy the game, but if they fail to impress even when hiding those flaws then it can't be too good.

And don't say that it doesn't have any flaws, everything since the dawn of man has had flaws.

PH was bland, easy, empty, and repeditive.
ST looks like it will be the opposite.

 

[Jas0n]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Go watch the review like Tye said, that's a non Nintendo source saying the game is good.

I did, and I'm still not impressed.

Besides, they didn't exactly say it was good.

Ok, then go read the hands-on look over at IGN, who are also praising the game.

lol, he's not gonna change his mind. Just accept some people won't like it.

This.

I think the only people who are actually going to like this game are the zelda/nintendo fanboys. The reason the massive review sites are rating it so high is because they don't want these fanboys flaming then xD

I never listen to these big review sites purely due to the fact they're highly biased, I prefer reviews from people that have nothing to sway their thoughts.

 

[Megamannt125]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

I did, and I'm still not impressed.

Besides, they didn't exactly say it was good.

Ok, then go read the hands-on look over at IGN, who are also praising the game.

lol, he's not gonna change his mind. Just accept some people won't like it.

This.

I think the only people who are actually going to like this game are the zelda/nintendo fanboys. The reason the massive review sites are rating it so high is because they don't want these fanboys flaming then xD

I never listen to these big review sites purely due to the fact they're highly biased, I prefer reviews from people that have nothing to sway their thoughts.

Then i'll review it when I get it.

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

I did, and I'm still not impressed.

Besides, they didn't exactly say it was good.

Ok, then go read the hands-on look over at IGN, who are also praising the game.

lol, he's not gonna change his mind. Just accept some people won't like it.

This.

I think the only people who are actually going to like this game are the zelda/nintendo fanboys. The reason the massive review sites are rating it so high is because they don't want these fanboys flaming then xD

I never listen to these big review sites purely due to the fact they're highly biased, I prefer reviews from people that have nothing to sway their thoughts.

If anything, most reviewing sites are biased against Nintendo. And now they're praising a game, and you think they're being biased?! Just give Spirit Tracks a chance.

 

[Jas0n]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

No, but if they fail to impress with trailers and advertisements where they hide all the game's flaws and emphasise good points, it's not exactly going to be excellent, is it?

What "flaws" are you seeing? >_>

I never said that I saw any flaws, I just said that all the flaws are hidden on trailers, etc which they do on purpose to make people buy the game, but if they fail to impress even when hiding those flaws then it can't be too good.

And don't say that it doesn't have any flaws, everything since the dawn of man has had flaws.

PH was bland, easy, empty, and repeditive.
ST looks like it will be the opposite.

Bland - Is ST not even more bland due to the fact it's got fixed locations on the track?
Easy - From what I've seen, ST looks easy enough for my mum to play.
Empty - Don't know about this one, hard to judge with what I've seen.
Repetitive - It's yet another Zelda game, need I say any more?

 

[Jas0n]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Ok, then go read the hands-on look over at IGN, who are also praising the game.

lol, he's not gonna change his mind. Just accept some people won't like it.

This.

I think the only people who are actually going to like this game are the zelda/nintendo fanboys. The reason the massive review sites are rating it so high is because they don't want these fanboys flaming then xD

I never listen to these big review sites purely due to the fact they're highly biased, I prefer reviews from people that have nothing to sway their thoughts.

Then i'll review it when I get it.

You're one of the most biased people here.

The only non-biased person I'd trust for game reviews on this forum would probably be AndyB xD

 

[beehdaubs]

The Imaginez series will always be better than anything released by Nintendo.
Admit it.

 

[Rawburt]

The Imaginez series will always be better than anything released by Nintendo.
Admit it.

Holy crap, babies! Thanks Ubisoft!

 

[Megamannt125]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

lol, he's not gonna change his mind. Just accept some people won't like it.

This.

I think the only people who are actually going to like this game are the zelda/nintendo fanboys. The reason the massive review sites are rating it so high is because they don't want these fanboys flaming then xD

I never listen to these big review sites purely due to the fact they're highly biased, I prefer reviews from people that have nothing to sway their thoughts.

Then i'll review it when I get it.

You're one of the most biased people here.

The only non-biased person I'd trust for game reviews on this forum would probably be AndyB xD

I'm biased, yet there I was calling a Zelda game repeditive, bland, and easy. Recent Zelda games like Twilight Princess have disappointed me, I either love ST, like it, or be disappointed from it, which i'll know once I get the game. I'm not biased at all.

 

[Jas0n]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

This.

I think the only people who are actually going to like this game are the zelda/nintendo fanboys. The reason the massive review sites are rating it so high is because they don't want these fanboys flaming then xD

I never listen to these big review sites purely due to the fact they're highly biased, I prefer reviews from people that have nothing to sway their thoughts.

Then i'll review it when I get it.

You're one of the most biased people here.

The only non-biased person I'd trust for game reviews on this forum would probably be AndyB xD

I'm biased, yet there I was calling a Zelda game repeditive, bland, and easy. Recent Zelda games like Twilight Princess have disappointed me, I either love ST, like it, or be disappointed from it, which i'll know once I get the game. I'm not biased at all.

Go ahead then, but I wouldn't get your hopes up.