This just proves how biased reviewers are today

[NGT]

Are you crying over an 86% score what the *censored.3.0* is wrong with you.

You're missing the point. >_>

I could care less what the score is. Yes, 86% is a good score, I get that. The problem is that Spirit Tracks got a lower score than every other Zelda game, even Phantom Hourglass, despite it having clear improvements upon it.

EDIT: What Andrew said, lol.

Its the job of the reviewer to rate it how he/she feels about it not everybody is going to agree 86% is fine its not a big deal its not like everyone thinks its the worst game of all time.

I already said that it's not the 86% that's the problem. >_> And, yes, reviews are based on the reviewers' opinions, but a lot of the time reviewers don't take into account that other people have different opinions, and they state their opinions as fact.

Kind of like you're doing right now.....

 

[Ciaran]

Are you crying over an 86% score what the *censored.3.0* is wrong with you.

You're missing the point. >_>

I could care less what the score is. Yes, 86% is a good score, I get that. The problem is that Spirit Tracks got a lower score than every other Zelda game, even Phantom Hourglass, despite it having clear improvements upon it.

EDIT: What Andrew said, lol.

Its the job of the reviewer to rate it how he/she feels about it not everybody is going to agree 86% is fine its not a big deal its not like everyone thinks its the worst game of all time.

I already said that it's not the 86% that's the problem. >_> And, yes, reviews are based on the reviewers' opinions, but a lot of the time reviewers don't take into account that other people have different opinions, and they state their opinions as fact.

No, they use fact to back up their opinions...

There's always a problem when you don't agree with someone, Tye...

 

[«Jack»]

Are you crying over an 86% score what the *censored.3.0* is wrong with you.

You're missing the point. >_>

I could care less what the score is. Yes, 86% is a good score, I get that. The problem is that Spirit Tracks got a lower score than every other Zelda game, even Phantom Hourglass, despite it having clear improvements upon it.

EDIT: What Andrew said, lol.

Its the job of the reviewer to rate it how he/she feels about it not everybody is going to agree 86% is fine its not a big deal its not like everyone thinks its the worst game of all time.

I already said that it's not the 86% that's the problem. >_> And, yes, reviews are based on the reviewers' opinions, but a lot of the time reviewers don't take into account that other people have different opinions, and they state their opinions as fact.

Kind of like you're doing right now.....

+1
Seriously Tye, stop being such a hypocrite. You're going all "THEY SHOULD LISTEN TO OTHER'S OPINIONS" and then you go on to ignore all that we say, simply because it doesn't fit into your argument.

 

[NGT]

Do I smell something burning?

 

[Tyeforce]

Are you crying over an 86% score what the *censored.3.0* is wrong with you.

You're missing the point. >_>

I could care less what the score is. Yes, 86% is a good score, I get that. The problem is that Spirit Tracks got a lower score than every other Zelda game, even Phantom Hourglass, despite it having clear improvements upon it.

EDIT: What Andrew said, lol.

Its the job of the reviewer to rate it how he/she feels about it not everybody is going to agree 86% is fine its not a big deal its not like everyone thinks its the worst game of all time.

I already said that it's not the 86% that's the problem. >_> And, yes, reviews are based on the reviewers' opinions, but a lot of the time reviewers don't take into account that other people have different opinions, and they state their opinions as fact.

Kind of like you're doing right now.....

I'm not stating my opinions as fact. >_>

 

[NGT]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deeplower score than every other Zelda game, even Phantom Hourglass, despite it having clear improvements upon it.

EDIT: What Andrew said, lol.

Its the job of the reviewer to rate it how he/she feels about it not everybody is going to agree 86% is fine its not a big deal its not like everyone thinks its the worst game of all time.

I already said that it's not the 86% that's the problem. >_> And, yes, reviews are based on the reviewers' opinions, but a lot of the time reviewers don't take into account that other people have different opinions, and they state their opinions as fact.

Kind of like you're doing right now.....

I'm not stating my opinions as fact. >_>

I lol'd so hard.

 

[Mr. L]

Game quality is on the decline, get over it.

you're wrong and a troll get over it.

For the last time, I'm NOT a troll. My first account was banned because Miranda said I was posting profanity (which I really wasn't, she must have been looking at the wrong stuff.) When I made my second account I PM'd Miranda about it and she didn't ban me, which means she obviously didn't care. I have no idea why my 2nd account got banned by Comatose. Obviously he didn't see my PM with Miranda.

I don't know why people are having such a fit over me. There are several real trolls on right now. Have you seen the Sarah person?

That's YOU,you're Sarah.

 

[The Sign Painter]

Do I smell something burning?

That is rather odd, are we the only ones who smell it?

 

[Tyeforce]

Are you crying over an 86% score what the *censored.3.0* is wrong with you.

You're missing the point. >_>

I could care less what the score is. Yes, 86% is a good score, I get that. The problem is that Spirit Tracks got a lower score than every other Zelda game, even Phantom Hourglass, despite it having clear improvements upon it.

EDIT: What Andrew said, lol.

Its the job of the reviewer to rate it how he/she feels about it not everybody is going to agree 86% is fine its not a big deal its not like everyone thinks its the worst game of all time.

I already said that it's not the 86% that's the problem. >_> And, yes, reviews are based on the reviewers' opinions, but a lot of the time reviewers don't take into account that other people have different opinions, and they state their opinions as fact.

No, they use fact to back up their opinions...

There's always a problem when you don't agree with someone, Tye...

No, they use opinions. Whether you enjoy a game or not is your opinion, but reviewers don't take that into account. They think that if they don't have fun with the game, then no one can. Reviewers need to learn that everyone has different preferences. >_>

And I know you just hate me, you can stop saying it already.

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deeplower

I already said that it's not the 86% that's the problem. >_> And, yes, reviews are based on the reviewers' opinions, but a lot of the time reviewers don't take into account that other people have different opinions, and they state their opinions as fact.

Kind of like you're doing right now.....

I'm not stating my opinions as fact. >_>

I lol'd so hard.

Show me when I stated my opinion as fact, then.

 

[Ciaran]

Tye, a review IS an opinion...

You need to grow up...

 

[NGT]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deeplower

Kind of like you're doing right now.....

I'm not stating my opinions as fact. >_>

I lol'd so hard.

Show me when I stated my opinion as fact, then.

It's not just this topic

 

[NGT]

Tye, a review IS an opinion...

You need to grow up...

Tye....growing up? lol that's never going to happen.

 

[ATWA]

oh no someone has an opinion, must be terrible.

i didn't the article by the way

 

[//RUN.exe]

oh no someone has an opinion, must be terrible.

i didn't the article by the way

you didn't the article but i accidentally the whole article

 

[Lisathegreat!]

Game quality is on the decline, get over it.

you're wrong and a troll get over it.

For the last time, I'm NOT a troll. My first account was banned because Miranda said I was posting profanity (which I really wasn't, she must have been looking at the wrong stuff.) When I made my second account I PM'd Miranda about it and she didn't ban me, which means she obviously didn't care. I have no idea why my 2nd account got banned by Comatose. Obviously he didn't see my PM with Miranda.

I don't know why people are having such a fit over me. There are several real trolls on right now. Have you seen the Sarah person?

That's YOU,you're Sarah.

That's Griever. Not Sarah.

 

[Lisathegreat!]

Tye, a review IS an opinion...

You need to grow up...

Tye, knows that. He never said his opinion was a fact.

 

[beehdaubs]

All big name reviewers are biased. Get over it.

 

[VantagE]

Um who cares?

 

[NGT]

Um who cares?

Tyeforce