This just proves how biased reviewers are today

Shadow Jolteon said:
Gnome said:
nook said:
Someone who only plays FPSs rated these games.
wat. It's on a Zelda website.
The ratings come from GameRankings.com, it says. =P
Still that's an overall game rating site probably. So nook's wrong, plus how would he even know his preference of game. (Assuming it's a he)
 
Rawburt said:
I don't see what the problem is honestly, it's still an excellent score.
But every other Zelda game has a better score than Spirit Tracks. That's bull. Spirit Tracks was pretty much unanimously better than Phantom Hourglass, yet the reviewers gave Spirit Tracks a lower score! It just shows that reviewers are getting more and more biased. You know that something's not right when New Super Mario Bros. for DS gets a better score than New Super Mario Bros. Wii. It's like reviewers are completely ignoring their past scores.
 
It's because spirit tracks was really similar to the other zelda games, and the train was *censored.2.0*...


And this proves nothing about bias...
 
I agree with that rating. Actually, In all honesty, it should have been lower, but It's a Zelda game and god forbid someone give a Zelda game a low rating.
 
Neo-Griever said:
I agree with that rating. Actually, In all honesty, it should have been lower, but It's a Zelda game and god forbid someone give a Zelda game a low rating.
This.
 
I like Zelda games a lot, but most of them are overrated. I can't stand when they get like a 10/10 for their stories. I mean, come one. "Oh no!, the princess is kidnapped, I need to save her!" How old does that get.

But, Zelda games are still fun, and I love them a lot.
 
Neo-Griever said:
I like Zelda games a lot, but most of them are overrated. I can't stand when they get like a 10/10 for their stories. I mean, come one. "Oh no!, the princess is kidnapped, I need to save her!" How old does that get.

But, Zelda games are still fun, and I love them a lot.
INB4ZELDANERDS.

I'm calling that now.
 
Back
Top