The future of gaming: good or bad?

Amykins

♥Path Designer♥
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Posts
791
Bells
2,729
Mailbox
I've been playing video games since I was 5, and been working in the industry as a Producer since 2005. In that time, I've seen the average game launch go from a complete, polished experience to a quick cash-grab with little content in return for our money.

Seriously...the average play time for a game in 2000 was 40 hours. Now, it's FOUR. You pay $60 for a game, and then take it home to find out that you can't play with your friends unless they've bought their own copies of the game, and also that there's content already on the disk that you must pay for to unlock.


Microtransactions make me especially mad. Just look at the latest Dead Space game. You paid REAL money for ammo and weapons. Not only did this make the game laughably easy, but it ruined the balance of gameplay and made me feel almost dirty playing it.

"But you don't have to buy it!" Well yeah, of course. But that's not the point. Why is it there in the first place? Why design a game, sell it at a ridiculous price (digital games especially since there's no overhead for disk production), then make the game too difficult to beat unless you buy these extra items? It just reeks of corporate greed, especially when it comes from multi-million dollar businesses like EA, Ubisoft, even Blizzard! It never used to be this way. What happened?


I know this is a polarizing issue, so please don't think I'm trying to spark an argument. I'm just very passionate about this, since I've watched it deteriorate slowly before my eyes and it makes me sad to see so many game companies I've worked for succumb to dirty tactics that end up driving off their consumer base by implementing all of these anti-piracy measures which -newsflash- don't stop pirates at all. It just makes us gamers feel like we're being punished for buying a game legitimately. And the worst part is it's not going to stop until we have another video game crash like we did back in 1982.
 
I think that everyone always had to have their own copy. Maybe it was because back in the day, people played mario kart with their friends and were more social. Now technology is everything and we kind of do everything in our own comfort with wifi... If that makes sense.
 
Paid DLC is my mosted hated element in a game.

I mean, take a look at the SimCity game!
 
I believe once we buy the game we should get it all, paid DLC is annoying. :/
 
The video game industry... I don't know where to start. I agree that it is unfair to sell your customer an expensive game that hardly has content. I hate that you have to BUY that "extra" content that should have been in there in the first place. I don't mind it the way Borderlands or Skyrim did it because their expansions are not essential to the game. You don't need to experience them to understand what is going on.

However, paying for ammo? Paying for extra time? Paying for the ending of the game? Who the hell do they think we are? Understandably we can just...not pay, and a LOT of us do just that. We are the ones who get punished but at least our wallets are safe....if not slightly robbed. Unless I realllly want a game, I wait for reviews to let me know whether or not I will have to buy extras just to enjoy the game.

Hopefully we will get new managers/developers in the gaming world who won't do that to it's customers. I love video games but when you pay $60 for a game, it better be worth the money. Not some $15 bull crap game thrown together in a couple months =/
 
Exactly. I mean, adding content LATER for download is one thing, I don't mind that. But if the content is on the disk and you have to pay to unlock it, that's just plain theft. You're paying twice for the same item.

As for the whole wifi thing, there should ALWAYS be the option to play with friends, and the option to take your game and play it anywhere you choose. What we're seeing now is an activation code that only one person can unlock, kind of like computer software such as Photoshop. So if you want to lend your game, that you paid for, to a friend or take it with you on vacation, too bad, it won't work.

Wanna play a game online that you and your friend DO have? Whoops, you can't, because one of you doesn't have the same paid DLC as the other. I have seen this in soooo many games. It's just a dirty way of wringing out more money by forcing them to buy items they don't want just to be able to play with friends.
 
Buying an unpolished game is the worst feeling ever. And it happens all the time anymore (I'm looking at you Bethesda). Like everything, greed wants to ruin gaming too.
 
Buying an unpolished game is the worst feeling ever. And it happens all the time anymore (I'm looking at you Bethesda). Like everything, greed wants to ruin gaming too.

What unpolished games does Bethesda have? Unless by unpolished you mean "bugs" then yes, Skyrim was unpolished.

I'm a large defender of Bethesda, mostly because I want to work there >.>

But EA can go to hell. I don't know what the hell they think they're doing, but they are by far the least popular company out there.
 
I plan on being a indie developer and I don't plan on doing any of this stuff. I am very unsatisfied with how gaming is today and I feel that it will have to take future developers like me to put an end to this.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Also, I remember people on MiiVerse saying that Game & Wario needs DLC and I disagreed. After that, a user said "what is with the nintendo community and DLC?". First off, that's a stereotype. Not all nintendo fans dislike or like DLC. I personally feel that DLC is unnecessary. I like games where you have everything and that's it.
 
I plan on being a indie developer and I don't plan on doing any of this stuff. I am very unsatisfied with how gaming is today and I feel that it will have to take future developers like me to put an end to this.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Also, I remember people on MiiVerse saying that Game & Wario needs DLC and I disagreed. After that, a user said "what is with the nintendo community and DLC?". First off, that's a stereotype. Not all nintendo fans dislike or like DLC. I personally feel that DLC is unnecessary. I like games where you have everything and that's it.

Absolutely agreed. I hope to become a video game designer one day, and if I do ever design games and what is included, I'll include everything in the game. The only DLC I would make, if I had to make it, is extra power ups/weapons. They wouldn't completely ruin the game, just be a little extra helpful in case the weapons already there were not liked.
 
I plan on being a indie developer and I don't plan on doing any of this stuff. I am very unsatisfied with how gaming is today and I feel that it will have to take future developers like me to put an end to this.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Also, I remember people on MiiVerse saying that Game & Wario needs DLC and I disagreed. After that, a user said "what is with the nintendo community and DLC?". First off, that's a stereotype. Not all nintendo fans dislike or like DLC. I personally feel that DLC is unnecessary. I like games where you have everything and that's it.

I support indie game developers 100% I love their creativity and a lot of them justly price their games which makes me feel good purchasing from them. Good luck, we need more developers like you and Kippla.

I personally dislike the paid DLC all of a sudden coming from Nintendo. I don't remember when they started doing paid DLC but it's getting on my nerves!
 
Last edited:
I'm only 11 but hey, I can dream. I already have experience with video games and computers. I sure hope the gaming future becomes greater for everyone.
 
What unpolished games does Bethesda have? Unless by unpolished you mean "bugs" then yes, Skyrim was unpolished.

I'm a large defender of Bethesda, mostly because I want to work there >.>

But EA can go to hell. I don't know what the hell they think they're doing, but they are by far the least popular company out there.
All of Bethesda's games are embarrassingly awful and it's complete crap that the gaming community lets them get away with it because we can apply a few mods and suddenly that piece of crap is now a pegasus that poops gold. |: When did it become okay to purchase a game for $60, maybe do the story and the slap on mods to make up for poor storytelling and immersion? It blows my mind that gamers love them for that and then when another company releases a similarly poor game we blast them.

As for EA, aside from the microtransactions I see nothing wrong with what they're doing. Battlefield Premium gave me all the expansion packs saving me $15 if I purchased them all separately and I've enjoyed that. Need for Speed and Burnout gave me unique cars like Bond's Aston Martin or the DeLorean from Back to the Future (most named differently to avoid lawsuits) while the Airport and Big Surf Island gave me new places to speed through.


I support indie game developers 100% I love their creativity and a lot of them justly price their games which makes me feel good purchasing from them. Good luck, we need more developers like you and Kippla.

I personally dislike the paid DLC all of a sudden coming from Nintendo. I don't remember when they started doing paid DLC but it's getting on my nerves!
Fire Emblem: Awakening was the first game from Nintendo to incorporate paid DLC if memory serves. If Nintendo continues to do it alright, I see no problem with this. New Super Luigi U, while incredibly lazy in my mind, is one way to do paid DLC right. Something you'll get your money's worth with, plenty of playtime, challenge and changes to make it feel like a different game. Awakening's DLC allowed you to experience an alternate ending or enjoy fanservice or face difficult armies than only your units can take out.


This "paid DLC is bad" mentality is pretty lame honestly. Sure would I prefer more free stuff than paid? Yeah, but that can't really happen. It costs those big companies to churn out things like Fallout New Vegas' Lonesome Road, Burnout Paradise's Big Surf Island, and Mass Effect 2's The Arrival.
 
This "paid DLC is bad" mentality is pretty lame honestly. Sure would I prefer more free stuff than paid? Yeah, but that can't really happen. It costs those big companies to churn out things like Fallout New Vegas' Lonesome Road, Burnout Paradise's Big Surf Island, and Mass Effect 2's The Arrival.

Well I don't like DLC period. Paid or free, I don't like it.
 
Too bad. It's going to happen.

Not all the time, not all games have DLC. For example, Game & Wario, Wario Ware, Rhythm Heaven, Super Mario Galaxy, Super Mario Galaxy 2, Pikmin 3, Nintendo Land, Mario Kart and Super Mario Bros. Wii and Super Mario Bros. U (The reason why I am counting it as not having DLC is because it has a standalone retail version.

The only games I know about that has DLC is Animal Crossing, Samba de Amigo, DJ Hero, New Super Mario Bros. 2 and Fire Emblem Awakening. Which by the way some of these have some pretty crappy DLC *cough*samba de amigo and dj hero*cough*
 
I've been a video gamer since the Magnavox Odyssey (pre Atari Pong) and yes I still have both of those systems. and I survived the video game crash in the 80s and dived in when Nintendo revived the market, and now I'm sitting back waiting for the new crash which I hope happens sooner than later, so I'll still be around when the revival comes. I've lost faith in Video games for the most part when Sony and Microsoft jumped so completely into digital only, and even Nintendo has leaned heavily into these murky waters with the classic game downloads.

I have been burned by both Microsoft and Nintendo by purchasing invisible (digital) products and now can no longer enjoy ever again. and I now refuse to ever purchase any "download" ever again. Thankfully I have several years worth of game systems and games to sit back and enjoy as the industry finally implodes. If I cant hold it in my hands and play it on my systems for the next several years, then I'm not buying it.

And just for the record I will not be purchasing either of the consoles coming out this year, and unless Nintendo comes up with something very big and impressive for the Wii U I wont be bothering with it either. (sorry a single gimmick like a tablet controller and HD is not enough to pry cash out of my hands Nintendo)
 
So...What's so bad about going digital?

Points cards and prepaid cards are very annoying since they don't allow you to get only the exact amount of money you want plus you have to go all out of your house to get them once you run out or short on points/money. Also, if anything happens to your game console, you will lose all of your games just like that.

That's why people have a problem with games going digital.
 
I wouldn't mind digital so much if they were account bound instead of device bound. I mean, I bought New Leaf digitally but I worry that if my 3ds ever gets lost/stolen/broken I will never be able to see my town again. If it was account bound I could simply buy a new 3DS and log onto my account.
 
Back
Top