Street Fighter 4: The Rematch

Formatted wrong and colour is still on Studio RGB. Just saying. Other than that HD is the way everything should be done. Enough with the garbage quality thing people call standard definition.
 
David said:
Formatted wrong and colour is still on Studio RGB. Just saying. Other than that HD is the way everything should be done. Enough with the garbage quality thing people call standard definition.
Standard definition is actually what I prefer. =p

Anyway, good video Andy, even if Jackal was cheatin'
 
Rawburt said:
David said:
Formatted wrong and colour is still on Studio RGB. Just saying. Other than that HD is the way everything should be done. Enough with the garbage quality thing people call standard definition.
Standard definition is actually what I prefer. =p

Anyway, good video Andy, even if Jackal was cheatin'
...how? ....why? :X
 
David said:
Rawburt said:
David said:
Formatted wrong and colour is still on Studio RGB. Just saying. Other than that HD is the way everything should be done. Enough with the garbage quality thing people call standard definition.
Standard definition is actually what I prefer. =p

Anyway, good video Andy, even if Jackal was cheatin'
...how? ....why? :X
HD is unappealing and hurts my eyes, plus there's longer load times.

I watch everything in SD.
 
Rawburt said:
David said:
Rawburt said:
David said:
Formatted wrong and colour is still on Studio RGB. Just saying. Other than that HD is the way everything should be done. Enough with the garbage quality thing people call standard definition.
Standard definition is actually what I prefer. =p

Anyway, good video Andy, even if Jackal was cheatin'
...how? ....why? :X
HD is unappealing and hurts my eyes, plus there's longer load times.

I watch everything in SD.
SD hurts my eyes and gives me a headache. And even if you watch Andys video in SD, it was still recorded in HD which'll make it better quality than if it was recorded in SD originally.
 
SockHeadx4 said:
Looks amazing! How much was his capture card?
I'll find out next time I speak with him.

As for David, quit being such an ass and so negative all the time. If it's such a bother to you, don't watch our videos, don't comment on the threads.
This was the first thing Jackal had set up to capture. So any problems you have, go tell him.
 
David said:
Rawburt said:
David said:
Rawburt said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
...how? ....why? :X
HD is unappealing and hurts my eyes, plus there's longer load times.

I watch everything in SD.
SD hurts my eyes and gives me a headache. And even if you watch Andys video in SD, it was still recorded in HD which'll make it better quality than if it was recorded in SD originally.
Get glasses.
 
AndyB said:
SockHeadx4 said:
Looks amazing! How much was his capture card?
I'll find out next time I speak with him.

As for David, quit being such an ass and so negative all the time. If it's such a bother to you, don't watch our videos, don't comment on the threads.
This was the first thing Jackal had set up to capture. So any problems you have, go tell him.
I'm not being an ass, I'm telling you what's wrong.
 
SockHeadx4 said:
David said:
Rawburt said:
David said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
HD is unappealing and hurts my eyes, plus there's longer load times.

I watch everything in SD.
SD hurts my eyes and gives me a headache. And even if you watch Andys video in SD, it was still recorded in HD which'll make it better quality than if it was recorded in SD originally.
Get glasses.
I do wear glasses XD
 
SockHeadx4 said:
David said:
Rawburt said:
David said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
HD is unappealing and hurts my eyes, plus there's longer load times.

I watch everything in SD.
SD hurts my eyes and gives me a headache. And even if you watch Andys video in SD, it was still recorded in HD which'll make it better quality than if it was recorded in SD originally.
Get glasses.
http://www.nvnews.net/reviews/evga_geforce_9600_gt_ssc/images/hdv_nvdemo_1920_1080_1.jpg
 
David said:
SockHeadx4 said:
David said:
Rawburt said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
SD hurts my eyes and gives me a headache. And even if you watch Andys video in SD, it was still recorded in HD which'll make it better quality than if it was recorded in SD originally.
Get glasses.
http://www.nvnews.net/reviews/evga_geforce_9600_gt_ssc/images/hdv_nvdemo_1920_1080_1.jpg
To be fair, what a movie looks like isn't really a priority for me, if it's enjoyable enough it'll be good all the same.
 
David said:
SockHeadx4 said:
David said:
Rawburt said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
SD hurts my eyes and gives me a headache. And even if you watch Andys video in SD, it was still recorded in HD which'll make it better quality than if it was recorded in SD originally.
Get glasses.
http://www.nvnews.net/reviews/evga_geforce_9600_gt_ssc/images/hdv_nvdemo_1920_1080_1.jpg
Okay, um.. They are both the same quality *censored.1.2*. One is just brighter.
 
SockHeadx4 said:
David said:
Okay, um.. They are both the same quality *censored.1.2*. One is just brighter.
the reso. of the of the on on the left is smaller, and the bright effect is what you get when you shoot in *censored.2.0*ty sd.

and heres a better comparison

HDSDCOMPARISON.jpg
 
Hey David, stop trying to prove HD is better than SD. Not what this thread is about.
 
AndyB said:
Hey David, stop trying to prove HD is better than SD. Not what this thread is about.
It could be, the threads about Jackals new PVR, which records in HD, unlike your dazzle which you've used for all the other videos.
 
David said:
AndyB said:
Hey David, stop trying to prove HD is better than SD. Not what this thread is about.
It could be, the threads about Jackals new PVR, which records in HD, unlike your dazzle which you've used for all the other videos.
Could be, but isn't. So if that is all you have to say, go be an insufferable oaf somewhere else.
 
AndyB said:
David said:
AndyB said:
Hey David, stop trying to prove HD is better than SD. Not what this thread is about.
It could be, the threads about Jackals new PVR, which records in HD, unlike your dazzle which you've used for all the other videos.
Could be, but isn't. So if that is all you have to say, go be an insufferable oaf somewhere else.
lol, insufferable oaf?
 
David said:
SockHeadx4 said:
David said:
Okay, um.. They are both the same quality *censored.1.2*. One is just brighter.
the reso. of the of the on on the left is smaller, and the bright effect is what you get when you shoot in *censored.2.0*ty sd.

and heres a better comparison

HDSDCOMPARISON.jpg
You're giving me a headache.

o.x
 
Back
Top