Lol omg
What's that supposed to mean?
Lol omg
Agreed...I just feel bad for the person who started this thread. They're gonna come back to all of this![]()
Wow, this argument has no point...
I'm probably having like the worst day ever and I'm like one of the most calmest here.
Can everyone just calm down. I was trying to give some advice but anyway, the negative feedback should be removed. There is no need to just ruin someone's chances at a lot of stuff because they said one rude thing. Jeez.
"haha 3.5 million?" - peterjohnson
"5 Million." - MayorEvvie
"Are you an idiot, or are you just new to auctions? The whole point of bidding is to raise the bid little by little to win the object in question, and get the lowest price for it. By raising it higher and higher, it just annoys everyone, and you waste more of your money."
"If we wanted him to be sabotaged, we would have bid really high in the first place, and not try and keep it as low as possible."
O____________________________________O
"haha 3.5 million?" - peterjohnson
"5 Million." - MayorEvvie
"Are you an idiot, or are you just new to auctions? The whole point of bidding is to raise the bid little by little to win the object in question, and get the lowest price for it. By raising it higher and higher, it just annoys everyone, and you waste more of your money."
"If we wanted him to be sabotaged, we would have bid really high in the first place, and not try and keep it as low as possible."
O____________________________________O
Hey everyone I feel like I should be commenting on this since it was the comment directed to me that started this off.
MayorEvvie, what you said to me about being an idiot was actually very rude & immature. I'm quite a new user and I've never used the auction system before, so I wasn't aware of the rules. Having said that, what you said about raising bids in small amounts each time was wrong anyway; I was bidding against you and I'm allowed to bid any amount I want to in order to outbid you. However I know that you said it while we were both fighting over a villager we really wanted, and to be honest I really haven't thought about it since so don't worry about it. I'll just say that whenever you comment on any post in future you could make sure that it wouldn't be taken as negative by anyone else to avoid this sort of thing happening again.
I really would never condone giving a negative wifi rating to anyone, as I know how badly it looks on this forum, so I want to say I'm sorry for the actions that someone took who was maybe trying to back me up or fight my side, and I also want you to know that I don't know the user who give you this rating.
I also want you both to know that I really don't think you were bidding so highly to sabotage my bid, and even so it wouldn't have mattered anyway since I would have had to pull out if davestrider hadn't of been so generous and offered to buy Stitches for me, because I haven't got that kind of money. (by the way, I hope the person who started this thread, Mayor-Matt, is still okay with the sale after all that has happened.)
Thanks to everyone who has tried to fight for me and supported me haha, but I really just want to say let's forget the whole idiot thing and move on, there's no point in dragging this out any more than it has been.
(Also, I just want to say again thanks to davestrider for being so great and bidding for me, I hope that I can repay you somehow if we still win this auction haha!)
Why have a feeback system if it just gets removed?
Why have a feeback system if it just gets removed?
The wifi feedback system is to be used to report anything that happened when someone has come into your town/you have visited someone else's. Because the person who left the negative rating to both people in this thread didn't do either of those things, I also agree that the negative feedback should be removed, as it was used incorrectly.
The wifi feedback system is to be used to report anything that happened when someone has come into your town/you have visited someone else's. Because the person who left the negative rating to both people in this thread didn't do either of those things, I also agree that the negative feedback should be removed, as it was used incorrectly.