Sarah Palin makes her debut on Fox News
- Thread starter ATWA
- Start date
Shadow Jolteon
Senior Member
When I first heard this, I was a bit surprised. Though, since Fox has been quickly lowering it's standards even more in the last year or so, with their horribly biased, hateful reporters like Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Mike Huckabee, Glenn Beck, and Ann Coulter, it seems they want to bring another person on who isn't that great.
I'm sure we can expect her appearances as a correspondent (by the way, does she have any journalism experience? Not that honest reporting in national news seems to matter anymore.) to be just as bizarre and obnoxious as her speeches, interviews, and debates whilst running for the White House were. She'd make a good replacement for Gretchen Carlson on Fox and Friends, since Carlson is actually intelligent (but seems to lose it while on that show).
I'm not saying that the other national "news" networks aren't horribly biased, too, but Fox News has had the most insane stuff I've seen on a news network. =p
Edit: Nothing beats the fascination of the CNN reporters with their magic touch screens, though. They're insanely obsessed with those things. XD
I'm sure we can expect her appearances as a correspondent (by the way, does she have any journalism experience? Not that honest reporting in national news seems to matter anymore.) to be just as bizarre and obnoxious as her speeches, interviews, and debates whilst running for the White House were. She'd make a good replacement for Gretchen Carlson on Fox and Friends, since Carlson is actually intelligent (but seems to lose it while on that show).
I'm not saying that the other national "news" networks aren't horribly biased, too, but Fox News has had the most insane stuff I've seen on a news network. =p
Edit: Nothing beats the fascination of the CNN reporters with their magic touch screens, though. They're insanely obsessed with those things. XD
No one needs any experience to become a professional any more, why look at our president. I take that back, he could be doing a lot worse.Shadow Jolteon said:
Sarah Palin's book wasn't to good either, she can't write, I don't know how she got that thing to become a top seller.
Shadow Jolteon
Senior Member
Yeah, that's true. I was just curious as to whether or not Fox actually had any valid reason for bringing her onto their staff, other than "OH MY GOD IT'S SARAH PALIN SHE WANTS ON FOX!!!! WE LOVE YOU SARAH!!!". Fox News is way too biased to the Republican party. Though, they're not technically an actual news channel in the first place, anymore. Just a talk show network. Their president senior vice president even admitted that most of their programming isn't reporting anymore.John102 said:
And about Obama: Yeah, I agree there, too. He could be doing a lot worse. Then again, he could be doing something in the first place.
Eh, I still think Fox News is better than MSNBC. They're extremely biased, too, you know.
In fact, I really don't trust the media anymore. They can twist anyone or anything they want, and can get the public to believe whatever they want.
In fact, I really don't trust the media anymore. They can twist anyone or anything they want, and can get the public to believe whatever they want.
The thing about fox news now is that they really do stupid things. Those protests filled with teabaggers was mostly because they practically hosted it, and that is not something a news network should be doing.
If you want honest reporting that keeps other networks in check watch the daily show and colbert report, and keep you eye out for sarcasm
They just do such a great job at keeping the other networks lies in check. Such as claiming there have been more terrorist attacks under Obama than Bush.... it's like they forgot 9/11 happened under Bush, or the many other attacks under Bush. Of course as they pointed out this is basically like saying the president can control the disasters of his term, such as how there have been fewer cities destroyed by hurricanes under Obama Not something Bush could have stopped, any more than the president can really stop terrorist attacks, though whether these attacks are successful can reflect off them a bit.
msnbc is biased left , cnn depends on who is on, I've seen it lean both ways, fox is a bit more biased than either in my view.
If you want honest reporting that keeps other networks in check watch the daily show and colbert report, and keep you eye out for sarcasm
They just do such a great job at keeping the other networks lies in check. Such as claiming there have been more terrorist attacks under Obama than Bush.... it's like they forgot 9/11 happened under Bush, or the many other attacks under Bush. Of course as they pointed out this is basically like saying the president can control the disasters of his term, such as how there have been fewer cities destroyed by hurricanes under Obama Not something Bush could have stopped, any more than the president can really stop terrorist attacks, though whether these attacks are successful can reflect off them a bit.msnbc is biased left , cnn depends on who is on, I've seen it lean both ways, fox is a bit more biased than either in my view.
Lisathegreat!
Senior Member
I don't think I like watching any of those "News channels".. Their voices are ANNOYING! Very boring.. I just like reading the newspaper, and sometimes playing sudoku.
Agreed. John Stewart and Stephen Colbert FTW! XDSporge27 said:If you want honest reporting that keeps other networks in check watch the daily show and colbert report, and keep you eye out for sarcasm
fabiolovessunate
Senior Member
If I could kill people with my mind...
fabiolovessunate
Senior Member
Yo, I can see Russia from here.Bogmire said:
Similar threads
