Raising awareness for [NOPARSE].

[AnimalCrossingPerson]

Hey folks, I'm getting a little fed up of people posting how to do this and how to do that. They generally go like this.

Bob: Yo, how do I get this image into my signature?
Ben: Well, just plop in [IMG ]Your Link Here[/IMG] but take out that space!

THERE IS NO NEED FOR THAT CONFUSING NONSENSE.​

Simply wrap [NOPARSE] tags around it and you're sorted.

Bob: Yo, how do I get this image into my signature?
Ben: Well, just plop in [IMG ]Your Link Here[/IMG] but take out that space!
Ben: Well, just plop in [IMG]Your Link Here[/IMG]!
Ben: Well, just plop in [NOPARSE][IMG]Your Link Here[/IMG][/NOPARSE]!

Now, go use your new BBCode knowledge!​

Just don't start a [NOPARSE] ice bucket challenge. Please. Why would that even exist?​

 

[Bowie]

I shouldn't have to worry about people not knowing what a space or a quotation mark is, but unfortunately I do, so I'm definitely gonna be using this. Thanks!

 

[Jake]

Using the

 tag does the same thing, too (in case anyone would prefer that) - which is what I personally prefer to use 

[html][IMG]url here[/IMG]

 

[AnimalCrossingPerson]

Using the

 tag does the same thing, too (in case anyone would prefer that) - which is what I personally prefer to use 

[html][IMG]url here[/IMG]

If we could get rid of that subtitle that said "HTML code", I'd use it. Looks neater though, I will admit.

14/10/16 edit: NOPARSE could be used inside CODE, I guess. Labelling BBCode as HTML just causes confusion.

 

[vel]

i prefer the html thing, even if i sometimes stupidly forget the tags. i personally like it, because it's straight forward and easy to understand with the subtitle, but to each their own i guess.