Poll on Warnings / Bannings

stormcommander said:
Hub12 said:
stormcommander said:
We lock threads all the time. But some of you expect every thread to be locked. Like how this discussion started... Jas0n wanted the "unite" threads to be locked. I don't think so...
You SHOULD'VE locked the Unite Threads. <_<
Why? Because you didn't like them? Then what happens when someone wants to lock a thread you are chatting in?
No Storm it was not that. Something like this-

ALSO! (Wow am I getting fired up) I forgot who made that "rich people unite" topic, and when Nigel saw it he said stop flaming IT WAS FAR FROM FLAMING IT WAS OTHER USERS CALLING ONE USER RICH SNOTTY B*******!


Well she kinda deserved it but it doesn't matter!
 
stormcommander said:
Hub12 said:
stormcommander said:
We lock threads all the time. But some of you expect every thread to be locked. Like how this discussion started... Jas0n wanted the "unite" threads to be locked. I don't think so...
You SHOULD'VE locked the Unite Threads. <_<
Why? Because you didn't like them? Then what happens when someone wants to lock a thread you are chatting in?
The unite threads were pointless and had results of flame.

So did FOM's thread which he disguised as "PEOPLE WHO LOVE UNITE" You can edit a topic title and name, you know..
 
Tyeforce said:
Jas0n said:
Tyeforce said:
Continuing from the last thread...
Furry Sparks said:
More bans? No thanks. I've gotten suspended for making a sexual joke I didn't even mean to make before. Storm doesn't need more of a reason to ban me.
True... Some of the things that people get banned for are just ridiculous. Someone gets banned if they make a sexual joke that doesn't even offend anyone, but constant flamers don't? Yeah, that makes sense.
^
^
Everyone ignores my posts...


Also, I agree that there aren't enough active mods. When no mods are on (which is very often) is when we start to get hate threads and spam.
 
Exactly. More US mods, and they must be active too.

My first nomination would be Jason, but he's been slacking off lately..
 
Animalcrossingwhisperer said:
stormcommander said:
Hub12 said:
stormcommander said:
We lock threads all the time. But some of you expect every thread to be locked. Like how this discussion started... Jas0n wanted the "unite" threads to be locked. I don't think so...
You SHOULD'VE locked the Unite Threads. <_<
Why? Because you didn't like them? Then what happens when someone wants to lock a thread you are chatting in?
No Storm it was not that. Something like this-

ALSO! (Wow am I getting fired up) I forgot who made that "rich people unite" topic, and when Nigel saw it he said stop flaming IT WAS FAR FROM FLAMING IT WAS OTHER USERS CALLING ONE USER RICH SNOTTY B*******!


Well she kinda deserved it but it doesn't matter!
You don't think calling someone insults is flaming and that it should have been allowed? But then you say you want stricter modding?

???
 
xeladude said:
Exactly. More US mods, and they must be active too.

My first nomination would be Jason, but he's been slacking off lately..
I think Jas0n would make a good mod, too. I'd say myself, but nobody would want that. XD
 
stormcommander said:
Animalcrossingwhisperer said:
stormcommander said:
Hub12 said:
stormcommander said:
We lock threads all the time. But some of you expect every thread to be locked. Like how this discussion started... Jas0n wanted the "unite" threads to be locked. I don't think so...
You SHOULD'VE locked the Unite Threads. <_<
Why? Because you didn't like them? Then what happens when someone wants to lock a thread you are chatting in?
No Storm it was not that. Something like this-

ALSO! (Wow am I getting fired up) I forgot who made that "rich people unite" topic, and when Nigel saw it he said stop flaming IT WAS FAR FROM FLAMING IT WAS OTHER USERS CALLING ONE USER RICH SNOTTY B*******!


Well she kinda deserved it but it doesn't matter!
You don't think calling someone insults is flaming and that it should have been allowed? But then you say you want stricter modding?

???
No, she deserved it. She provoked everyone's angers by assuming she was better then everyone else.
 
xeladude said:
Exactly. More US mods, and they must be active too.

My first nomination would be Jason, but he's been slacking off lately..
Jas0n told me he should be banned for flaming. That was after he insulted me for being a "bad mod" and not banning the people who flame enough. Keep in mind that he is including himself in that.... so he thinks flaming is an issue here, yet flames so he can use himself as an example.
 
stormcommander said:
Animalcrossingwhisperer said:
stormcommander said:
Hub12 said:
stormcommander said:
We lock threads all the time. But some of you expect every thread to be locked. Like how this discussion started... Jas0n wanted the "unite" threads to be locked. I don't think so...
You SHOULD'VE locked the Unite Threads. <_<
Why? Because you didn't like them? Then what happens when someone wants to lock a thread you are chatting in?
No Storm it was not that. Something like this-

ALSO! (Wow am I getting fired up) I forgot who made that "rich people unite" topic, and when Nigel saw it he said stop flaming IT WAS FAR FROM FLAMING IT WAS OTHER USERS CALLING ONE USER RICH SNOTTY B*******!


Well she kinda deserved it but it doesn't matter!
You don't think calling someone insults is flaming and that it should have been allowed? But then you say you want stricter modding?

???
I don't mean it like that! I mean it was MUCH WORSE then flaming and everyone who looked at that thread knew it should have been locked, BUT NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
 
Tyeforce said:
Tyeforce said:
Jas0n said:
Tyeforce said:
Continuing from the last thread...
Furry Sparks said:
More bans? No thanks. I've gotten suspended for making a sexual joke I didn't even mean to make before. Storm doesn't need more of a reason to ban me.
True... Some of the things that people get banned for are just ridiculous. Someone gets banned if they make a sexual joke that doesn't even offend anyone, but constant flamers don't? Yeah, that makes sense.
^
^
Everyone ignores my posts...


Also, I agree that there aren't enough active mods. When no mods are on (which is very often) is when we start to get hate threads and spam.
We need more Uk mods. ^^
 
stormcommander said:
xeladude said:
Exactly. More US mods, and they must be active too.

My first nomination would be Jason, but he's been slacking off lately..
Jas0n told me he should be banned for flaming. That was after he insulted me for being a "bad mod" and not banning the people who flame enough. Keep in mind that he is including himself in that.... so he thinks flaming is an issue here, yet flames so he can use himself as an example.
._.

Ok...
If Jason has flamed so much as you say, why haven't you been the first to stop him?
 
Lewis said:
Tyeforce said:
Tyeforce said:
Jas0n said:
Tyeforce said:
Continuing from the last thread...

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
^
^
Everyone ignores my posts...


Also, I agree that there aren't enough active mods. When no mods are on (which is very often) is when we start to get hate threads and spam.
We need more Uk mods. ^^
All our mods except Darth are from the UK iirc.

And Darth is almost never on when the trouble is here.
 
Lewis said:
Tyeforce said:
Tyeforce said:
Jas0n said:
Tyeforce said:
Continuing from the last thread...

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
^
^
Everyone ignores my posts...


Also, I agree that there aren't enough active mods. When no mods are on (which is very often) is when we start to get hate threads and spam.
We need more Uk mods. ^^
Agreed. Nigel can't be here all the time.
 
xeladude said:
Now they are being TOO strict. I just got warned for the awesome smiley >_>
Are you kidding? You must be insane if you think what you just posted is acceptable here.
 
xeladude said:
Now they are being TOO strict. I just got warned for the awesome smiley >_>
I am pretty sure that they banned you for something else, and for the record I am all for them on that one.
 
Apparently he thought is was Awesome Face, but it was really Goatse. Probably a trick URL from Encyclopedia Dramatica. Oh, how I hate ED. >_> It's not his fault for that if that's the case.
 
Back
Top