Poll on Warnings / Bannings

Lawl. I don't really know. All I know is that NONE OF YOU('Cept Grawr) Lock thread's that need to be locked. =/
 
xeladude said:
Conor said:
I think you should have to Mods from the US and 2 Mods from the UK, that would help quite a bit because I never see Grawr or Sporge but I see DarthGohan and Nigel quite a bit.
I haven't seen Darth in ages.
He also warned me for bumping a topic, and it was becoming popular too..

Plus, we'd need more US mods then just 2.
3 or 4 can do.

Or 1 for every time zone in the US.
Yeah, I think there should be 2 UK mods and 3 US mods and Another Admin.
 
Hub12 said:
Lawl. I don't really know. All I know is that NONE OF YOU('Cept Grawr) Lock thread's that need to be locked. =/
Because when i lock threads that need to be locked I get flamed in PMs.
 
Nigel91 said:
Hub12 said:
Lawl. I don't really know. All I know is that NONE OF YOU('Cept Grawr) Lock thread's that need to be locked. =/
Because when i lock threads that need to be locked I get flamed in PMs.
Uhhh.....Ignore them? Duh... =/
 
Nigel91 said:
Hub12 said:
Lawl. I don't really know. All I know is that NONE OF YOU('Cept Grawr) Lock thread's that need to be locked. =/
Because when i lock threads that need to be locked I get flamed in PMs.
Nigel, show some backbone. Show them YOU are part of TBT, not just another regular member with some super powers. You need to stomp the floor and show your position as a rightful moderator of TBT.
 
Animalcrossingwhisperer said:
I said that it's the way it should be. Except for one thing, You should make one of those locked threads that only Mod. or Adm. can post or edit about all the consequences that will happen if you break a rule. In effect users may not make mistakes about posting something that may be offensive. Oh ya one more thing, there is this one users who should totally get banned, but no she has not! There is a whole page of her spamming if you don't believe me PM me for the culprit and the evidence!
Added to what I said earlier,BUMPING I mean it's ok if it's a bump there then a bump 2 hours later, but people I have seen people who have bumped twice in the 10 minute spand!
 
We lock threads all the time. But some of you expect every thread to be locked. Like how this discussion started... Jas0n wanted the "unite" threads to be locked. I don't think so...
 
stormcommander said:
MattyofAlbion said:
its a little too strict if u ask me...
when u suspended me i didnt even get a chance to look at the PM about why i was
suspended till I got back...not really useful then is it?
The PM is so you know when you get back. But Jas0n would have you banned for 2 weeks. <.<

Wouldn't that just irritate you instead of "teach you more of a lesson"

It's not like you are a mass-spammer (as of now)
i know but, shouldn't we know what we've been suspended/banned for BEFORE we actually are? just my opinion...
 
Animalcrossingwhisperer said:
Animalcrossingwhisperer said:
I said that it's the way it should be. Except for one thing, You should make one of those locked threads that only Mod. or Adm. can post or edit about all the consequences that will happen if you break a rule. In effect users may not make mistakes about posting something that may be offensive. Oh ya one more thing, there is this one users who should totally get banned, but no she has not! There is a whole page of her spamming if you don't believe me PM me for the culprit and the evidence!
Added to what I said earlier,BUMPING I mean it's ok if it's a bump there then a bump 2 hours later, but people I have seen people who have bumped twice in the 10 minute spand!
No, my bump was a day bump.
 
stormcommander said:
We lock threads all the time. But some of you expect every thread to be locked. Like how this discussion started... Jas0n wanted the "unite" threads to be locked. I don't think so...
You SHOULD'VE locked the Unite Threads. <_<
 
stormcommander said:
We lock threads all the time. But some of you expect every thread to be locked. Like how this discussion started... Jas0n wanted the "unite" threads to be locked. I don't think so...
Why would anyone hate the unite threads??? 0_o
 
'Moderation is not strict enough.'

We need more world-wide moderators as many members are from different time zones, maybe a moderator from the Uk as most of the members are from the USA & Uk?
 
See, everyone has different opinions so no matter what we do it'll upset someone.
 
ALSO! (Wow am I getting fired up) I forgot who made that "rich people unite" topic, and when Nigel saw it he said stop flaming IT WAS FAR FROM FLAMING IT WAS OTHER USERS CALLING ONE USER RICH SNOTTY B*******!


Well she kinda deserved it but it doesn't matter!
 
Hub12 said:
stormcommander said:
We lock threads all the time. But some of you expect every thread to be locked. Like how this discussion started... Jas0n wanted the "unite" threads to be locked. I don't think so...
You SHOULD'VE locked the Unite Threads. <_<
Why? Because you didn't like them? Then what happens when someone wants to lock a thread you are chatting in?
 
stormcommander said:
Hub12 said:
stormcommander said:
We lock threads all the time. But some of you expect every thread to be locked. Like how this discussion started... Jas0n wanted the "unite" threads to be locked. I don't think so...
You SHOULD'VE locked the Unite Threads. <_<
Why? Because you didn't like them? Then what happens when someone wants to lock a thread you are chatting in?
Uhhh....You and I both know that the "Rich Unite" thread WAS gonna start a flame war.
 
Back
Top