No. I've tried it in the field as well. The elephants won again.John102 said:The elephants had the better position, since they're on that little bridge only a few people could attack at a time, if they had been in a field the elephants would have gotten overpowered.
This post makes me laugh in so many ways. First off, lrn2imply. Second, the videos aren't stupid, because people are obviously enjoying them. Third, this is only my second video.You are becoming mega posting stupid videos in Brewsters.
> Videos
Yeah, I do recommend it. It's a rather fun game.Anyway, would you recommend Rome total war? It'd be one of the few RTS's my comp could handle.
Then this obviously isn't a very realistic war game.bdubs2594 said:No. I've tried it in the field as well. The elephants won again.John102 said:The elephants had the better position, since they're on that little bridge only a few people could attack at a time, if they had been in a field the elephants would have gotten overpowered.
It's very realistic. These are elephants, you know. And besides, these weren't real soldiers. They were peasants with daggers.John102 said:Then this obviously isn't a very realistic war game.bdubs2594 said:No. I've tried it in the field as well. The elephants won again.John102 said:The elephants had the better position, since they're on that little bridge only a few people could attack at a time, if they had been in a field the elephants would have gotten overpowered.![]()
It starts at 2 then 4 then 8 so-onbdubs2594 said:No. I've tried it in the field as well. The elephants won again.John102 said:The elephants had the better position, since they're on that little bridge only a few people could attack at a time, if they had been in a field the elephants would have gotten overpowered.
This post makes me laugh in so many ways. First off, lrn2imply. Second, the videos aren't stupid, because people are obviously enjoying them. Third, this is only my second video.You are becoming mega posting stupid videos in Brewsters.
> Videos
Yeah, I do recommend it. It's a rather fun game.Anyway, would you recommend Rome total war? It'd be one of the few RTS's my comp could handle.
...over 1,000 dogs is a meme? What the *censored.3.0* are you talking about?#Garrett said:It starts at 2 then 4 then 8 so-onbdubs2594 said:No. I've tried it in the field as well. The elephants won again.John102 said:The elephants had the better position, since they're on that little bridge only a few people could attack at a time, if they had been in a field the elephants would have gotten overpowered.
This post makes me laugh in so many ways. First off, lrn2imply. Second, the videos aren't stupid, because people are obviously enjoying them. Third, this is only my second video.You are becoming mega posting stupid videos in Brewsters.
> Videos
Yeah, I do recommend it. It's a rather fun game.Anyway, would you recommend Rome total war? It'd be one of the few RTS's my comp could handle.
No these are stupid imo, lolol theres a lot of dogs fighitng with and old joke meme as a title.
no, OVER 1 THOUSAND!!! is a meme such as OVER 9,000!!!!!!bdubs2594 said:...over 1,000 dogs is a meme? What the *censored.3.0* are you talking about?#Garrett said:It starts at 2 then 4 then 8 so-onbdubs2594 said:No. I've tried it in the field as well. The elephants won again.John102 said:The elephants had the better position, since they're on that little bridge only a few people could attack at a time, if they had been in a field the elephants would have gotten overpowered.
This post makes me laugh in so many ways. First off, lrn2imply. Second, the videos aren't stupid, because people are obviously enjoying them. Third, this is only my second video.You are becoming mega posting stupid videos in Brewsters.
> Videos
Yeah, I do recommend it. It's a rather fun game.Anyway, would you recommend Rome total war? It'd be one of the few RTS's my comp could handle.
No these are stupid imo, lolol theres a lot of dogs fighitng with and old joke meme as a title.
Oh yeah, and in a way, your implying that I'm going to turn into Mega by posting a lot of stupid videos that haven't even been (or will be for that matter) posted yet. lrn2makeavalidargument
Over 1,000 was never a meme. Seriously, you're making most of this up.#Garrett said:no, OVER 1 THOUSAND!!! is a meme such as OVER 9,000!!!!!!bdubs2594 said:...over 1,000 dogs is a meme? What the *censored.3.0* are you talking about?#Garrett said:It starts at 2 then 4 then 8 so-onbdubs2594 said:No. I've tried it in the field as well. The elephants won again.John102 said:The elephants had the better position, since they're on that little bridge only a few people could attack at a time, if they had been in a field the elephants would have gotten overpowered.
This post makes me laugh in so many ways. First off, lrn2imply. Second, the videos aren't stupid, because people are obviously enjoying them. Third, this is only my second video.You are becoming mega posting stupid videos in Brewsters.
> Videos
Yeah, I do recommend it. It's a rather fun game.Anyway, would you recommend Rome total war? It'd be one of the few RTS's my comp could handle.
No these are stupid imo, lolol theres a lot of dogs fighitng with and old joke meme as a title.
Oh yeah, and in a way, your implying that I'm going to turn into Mega by posting a lot of stupid videos that haven't even been (or will be for that matter) posted yet. lrn2makeavalidargument
They are stupid imo.
saying anything OVER (insert # here) Can be a meme and theres a video no it.bdubs2594 said:Over 1,000 was never a meme. Seriously, you're making most of this up.#Garrett said:no, OVER 1 THOUSAND!!! is a meme such as OVER 9,000!!!!!!bdubs2594 said:...over 1,000 dogs is a meme? What the *censored.3.0* are you talking about?#Garrett said:It starts at 2 then 4 then 8 so-onbdubs2594 said:Quoting limited to 5 levels deep
No these are stupid imo, lolol theres a lot of dogs fighitng with and old joke meme as a title.
Oh yeah, and in a way, your implying that I'm going to turn into Mega by posting a lot of stupid videos that haven't even been (or will be for that matter) posted yet. lrn2makeavalidargument
They are stupid imo.
So you're saying that 1,000 regular people with daggers couldn't take down an elephant? That's crazy.bdubs2594 said:It's very realistic. These are elephants, you know. And besides, these weren't real soldiers. They were peasants with daggers.John102 said:Then this obviously isn't a very realistic war game.bdubs2594 said:No. I've tried it in the field as well. The elephants won again.John102 said:The elephants had the better position, since they're on that little bridge only a few people could attack at a time, if they had been in a field the elephants would have gotten overpowered.![]()
That's why it was done in custom battle B)Paradox said:I see no point in this video.
Peasants are terrible and no one ever trains them except computers.
And no one gets elephants. You need like 400 buildings to get them and they use all your money to get one.
1,000 peasants couldn't because they're horrible at fighting. And by the way, these elephants are armored, so simple daggers can't break that armor, not to forget about the elephant's tough skin.So you're saying that 1,000 regular people with daggers couldn't take down an elephant?