Online List

[Tennis=Life]

I think it's at 20 mins right now, the point of that is to see who is online, so I suggest putting it down to like 10 mins...

 

[SL92]

It's true. That thing is to see who's currently online, not someone who left 20 minutes ago. The thing is, if everybody logged off INSTEAD of just closing their browser and staying logged on, we could tell who's actually still here.

Post Quality: This is my mission.

 

[Tyler]

[quote="Shadow_] It's true. That thing is to see who's currently online, not someone who left 20 minutes ago. The thing is, if everybody logged off INSTEAD of just closing their browser and staying logged on, we could tell who's actually still here.

Post Quality: This is my mission. [/quote]
Well the only reason I don't log out is only because I would have to re-type all of my cookies and that is stressful. I think 10 minutes would be good.

 

[Grawr]

[quote="Shadow_] It's true. That thing is to see who's currently online, not someone who left 20 minutes ago. The thing is, if everybody logged off INSTEAD of just closing their browser and staying logged on, we could tell who's actually still here.

Post Quality: This is my mission.

Well the only reason I don't log out is only because I would have to re-type all of my cookies and that is stressful. I think 10 minutes would be good. [/quote]
I really agree with this whole idea, but I personally would even lower it from 10. Like, maybe 5 minutes???

 

[Tyler]

[quote="Shadow_] It's true. That thing is to see who's currently online, not someone who left 20 minutes ago. The thing is, if everybody logged off INSTEAD of just closing their browser and staying logged on, we could tell who's actually still here.

Post Quality: This is my mission.

Well the only reason I don't log out is only because I would have to re-type all of my cookies and that is stressful. I think 10 minutes would be good.

I really agree with this whole idea, but I personally would even lower it from 10. Like, maybe 5 minutes??? [/quote]
No only because the list could get shorter and it would look like no one is on as to if there are 5 extra minutes.

 

[Jeremy]

It's 20 because some people could be posting something for that long and especially in chat or games/arcade for that long. It's when ever you clicked last.

 

[Tennis=Life]

But, if they've been posting for like 20 mins, they technically wouldn't be able to do all of the other stuff people could do online. And when they get back from posting they should be back on the list, because you can't, for example, pm someone who has been posting for 20 minutes...so that's my ideas on why it should be changed. It's very misleading.

 

[Jeremy]

Trust me, we have tried it at all sorts of times, and 20 is fine.

 

[TwilightKing]

But, if they've been posting for like 20 mins, they technically wouldn't be able to do all of the other stuff people could do online. And when they get back from posting they should be back on the list, because you can't, for example, pm someone who has been posting for 20 minutes...so that's my ideas on why it should be changed. It's very misleading.

I kind of agree with PKMNMasterSamus and STORMTROOPER88888.




Maybe we should just leave it alone and forget about this h43r:

 

[SL92]

But, if they've been posting for like 20 mins, they technically wouldn't be able to do all of the other stuff people could do online.