New Gov't Rules Allow Unapproved IPhone Apps

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sonicdude41

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Posts
553
Bells
2,353
Owners of the iPhone will be able to legally unlock their devices so they can run software applications that haven't been approved by Apple Inc., according to new government rules announced Monday.

The decision to allow the practice commonly known as "jailbreaking" is one of a handful of new exemptions from a 1998 federal law that prohibits people from bypassing technical measures that companies put on their products to prevent unauthorized use of copyright-protected material. The Library of Congress, which oversees the Copyright Office, reviews and authorizes exemptions every three years to ensure that the law does not prevent certain non-infringing uses of copyright-protected works.

For iPhone jailbreakers, the new rules effectively legitimize a practice that has been operating in a legal gray area by exempting it from liability. Apple claims that jailbreaking is an unauthorized modification of its software.

Mario Ciabarra, founder of Rock Your Phone, which calls itself an "independent iPhone application store," said the rules mark the first step toward opening the iPhone app market to competition and removing the "handcuffs" that Apple imposes on developers that want to reach users of the wildly popular device.

Unless users unlock their handsets, they can only download apps from Apple's iTunes store. Software developers must get such apps pre-approved by Apple, which sometimes demands changes or rejects programs for what developers say are vague reasons.

Ciabarra noted that Google Inc. has taken a different approach with its Android operating system, which is emerging as the biggest competitor to the iPhone. Google allows users of Android phones to download applications from outside the Android Market.

Although Apple has never prosecuted anyone for jailbreaking, it does use software upgrades to disable jailbroken phones, and the new government rules won't put a stop to that. That means owners of such phones might not be able to take advantage of software improvements, and they still run the risk of voiding their warranty.

Apple spokesman Natalie Kerris said Monday that the company is concerned about jailbreaking because the practice can make an iPhone unstable and unreliable.

"Apple's goal has always been to ensure that our customers have a great experience with their iPhone, and we know that jailbreaking can severely degrade the experience," she said.

In addition to jailbreaking, other exemptions announced Monday would:

- allow owners of used cell phones to break access controls on their phones in order to switch wireless carriers.

- allow people to break technical protections on video games to investigate or correct security flaws.

- allow college professors, film students, documentary filmmakers and producers of noncommercial videos to break copy-protection measures on DVDs so they can embed clips for educational purposes, criticism or commentary.

- allow computer owners to bypass the need for external security devices called dongles if the dongle no longer works and cannot be replaced.

- allow blind people to break locks on electronic books so that they can use them with read-aloud software and similar aides.

Although the jailbreaking exemption is new, all the others are similar to the last set of exemptions, which were announced in November 2006. The new rules take effect Tuesday and are expected to last a few years.

The exceptions are a big victory for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which had urged the Library of Congress to legalize several of them, including the two regarding cell phones.

Jennifer Stisa Granick, EFF's civil liberties director, said the rules are based on an important principle: Consumers should be allowed to use and modify the devices that they purchase the way they want. "If you bought it, you own it," she said.
While this is good and all, it'd be better if the DMCA was just eliminated entirely. Thoughts?
 
I didn't bother reading the entire thing but they're allowing people to steal apps by jailbreaking now? That's just...lovely.
 
This doesn't effect Apple nor the consumer, just the developers of the jailbreak. Basically, they can't get sued for what they're doing. Apple can continue to add protection and break jailbreaks all they wish.
 
No this isn't bad for the producers of applications, just apple. Why? CAuse up til now you needed Apple's approval for anything which has fees entailed, but now, anyone can write their own apps to sell, now given you still may want apple approved ones because those are the tested ones, but it allows for alternative app stores.

The apps are more like programs ona computer now, because you can't be sued for writing a program for a computer (so long as it is original :-p )
 
The only problem is that most of the new software and new iPhones is actually coded differently, so they can sometimes block the jailbreak. I however have a iPod Touch 2G MB Model. So I'm pretty much fine unless it breaks. It sucks for people who have a MC Model though.

So this means that if you jailbreaked your iPod you still have your warranty?
 
ACfan192 said:
This doesn't effect Apple nor the consumer, just the developers of the jailbreak. Basically, they can't get sued for what they're doing. Apple can continue to add protection and break jailbreaks all they wish.
This. It really doesn't change much at all.
 
Nic said:
The only problem is that most of the new software and new iPhones is actually coded differently, so they can sometimes block the jailbreak. I however have a iPod Touch 2G MB Model. So I'm pretty much fine unless it breaks. It sucks for people who have a MC Model though.

So this means that if you jailbreaked your iPod you still have your warranty?
I don't think so. They can still make it that you have to follow their rules to stay under warranty. Just they can't call the feds after you now :-p
 
FarrenTheRobot said:
Schnookumnookum said:
Apple is like a dictatorship
just like how your pants aren't.


anyways, pretty good I guess, I mean, as long as they aren't using it to steal apps I think Jail Breaking is okay.
I'm glad my moms not a dictator. Are all parents supposed to be dictators or something?
 
Schnookumnookum said:
FarrenTheRobot said:
Schnookumnookum said:
Apple is like a dictatorship
just like how your pants aren't.


anyways, pretty good I guess, I mean, as long as they aren't using it to steal apps I think Jail Breaking is okay.
I'm glad my moms not a dictator. Are all parents supposed to be dictators or something?
Did you mistake the word "pants" for "parents"?
 
Mino said:
Schnookumnookum said:
FarrenTheRobot said:
Schnookumnookum said:
Apple is like a dictatorship
just like how your pants aren't.


anyways, pretty good I guess, I mean, as long as they aren't using it to steal apps I think Jail Breaking is okay.
I'm glad my moms not a dictator. Are all parents supposed to be dictators or something?
Did you mistake the word "pants" for "parents"?
Well the use of pants there... it is slightly puzzling to me :-p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top