Jas0n tells me...

[Jeremy]

"If the mods don't start banning people for longer periods of time, people will leave TBT."

 

[Jas0n]

Way to twist what I said, as usual ;D

How about I make the poll?

 

[Jeremy]

Way to twist what I said, as usual ;D

How about I make the poll?

I'm not twisting it. You accused me of being a bad moderator for not controlling people like you. You then said TBT's members would drop if continues. And you said I didn't know how to run a forum because people aren't banned enough. Meaning you believe more bans equals more members. Which doesn't make any sense since no one likes being banned.

 

[Jas0n]

Way to twist what I said, as usual ;D

How about I make the poll?

I'm not twisting it. You accused me of being a bad moderator for not controlling people like you. You then said TBT's members would drop if continues. And you said I didn't know how to run a forum because people aren't banned enough. Meaning you believe more bans equals more members. Which doesn't make any sense since no one likes being banned.

No, I said that the people that take warns and 2 day suspensions as jokes obviously are just going to continue what they were doing, so they should be banned or atleast suspended for longer. But that was only one part of the argument :]

 

[Silverstorms]

Way to twist what I said, as usual ;D

How about I make the poll?

I'm not twisting it. You accused me of being a bad moderator for not controlling people like you. You then said TBT's members would drop if continues. And you said I didn't know how to run a forum because people aren't banned enough. Meaning you believe more bans equals more members. Which doesn't make any sense since no one likes being banned.

True, but when you do something wrong you know you will have to face the consequences.

 

[Jeremy]

Way to twist what I said, as usual ;D

How about I make the poll?

I'm not twisting it. You accused me of being a bad moderator for not controlling people like you. You then said TBT's members would drop if continues. And you said I didn't know how to run a forum because people aren't banned enough. Meaning you believe more bans equals more members. Which doesn't make any sense since no one likes being banned.

No, I said that the people that take warns and 2 day suspensions as jokes obviously are just going to continue what they were doing, so they should be banned or atleast suspended for longer. But that was only one part of the argument :]

Average ban is about 3 days, so you think we should make that a week? Turn the week bans into a month? And turn the month bans into a year?

 

[Tyeforce]

I have to agree with him.

 

[Bacon Boy]

The one thing that bothers me are that there are some people who haven't been banned yet, and I don't even know if they've been warned. It bothers me somewhat that the people that continue to bother others, flame, make themselves self-proclaimed rulers, need to be dealt with by warn or ban/suspension.

 

[Jas0n]

The one thing that bothers me are that there are some people who haven't been banned yet, and I don't even know if they've been warned. It bothers me somewhat that the people that continue to bother others, flame, make themselves self-proclaimed rulers, need to be dealt with by warn or ban/suspension.

This is what I was trying to say, but Jeremy likes to twist things.

All he says about these people is: "You don't know whether we've warned/suspended them or not!" - Well we do, considering they're still here xD

 

[Jeremy]

The one thing that bothers me are that there are some people who haven't been banned yet, and I don't even know if they've been warned. It bothers me somewhat that the people that continue to bother others, flame, make themselves self-proclaimed rulers, need to be dealt with by warn or ban/suspension.

This is what Tyeforce told me in PM. But you guys are forgetting that you can't see who gets warned or banned.

 

[Bacon Boy]

Average ban is about 3 days, so you think we should make that a week? Turn the week bans into a month? And turn the month bans into a year?

Hm... maybe more along the lines of this:

If you've been warned 2 times (depending on the seriousness of the offense, you will either be banned for three days or warned.

If you've been warned 3 (2+ the 1) or more times in a consecutive period of two months, then you will be banned for a week.

Any further bans/suspensions will be discussed among the staff.

Does that work? I know it's a bit rough, but that could be the basis.

 

[Silverstorms]

It bothers me that there are SO many new people who haven't even read the rules.

 

[Jas0n]

The one thing that bothers me are that there are some people who haven't been banned yet, and I don't even know if they've been warned. It bothers me somewhat that the people that continue to bother others, flame, make themselves self-proclaimed rulers, need to be dealt with by warn or ban/suspension.

This is what Tyeforce told me in PM. But you guys are forgetting that you can't see who gets warned or banned.

See what I mean? xD

Jas0n points towards the correct poll: http://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7189658/1/

 

[Bacon Boy]

It bothers me that there are SO many new people who haven't even read the rules.

:O

ANOTHER IDEA!

If they don't read the rules, they can't post. So if they do something out of line, then say they didn't know that it was against the rules, warn them for not reading the rules.

 

[Jeremy]

[2:35pm] Jeremy: so Jas0n, how long do you think you should be banned for?
[2:36pm] Jas0n: As I've said before, 2 day suspension and if I take it as a joke and continue, then a week, and joke/continue a month ;D
[2:37pm] Jeremy: 2 days?
[2:37pm] Jeremy: you have contradicted yourself
[2:37pm] Jeremy: that is the minimum suspension
[2:38pm] Jeremy: since you would be going to 40%, it would be a week on our normal scale
[2:38pm] Jeremy: a month on your proposed one

 

[MygL]

It bothers me that there are SO many new people who haven't even read the rules.

:O

ANOTHER IDEA!

If they don't read the rules, they can't post. So if they do something out of line, then say they didn't know that it was against the rules, warn them for not reading the rules.

OLOLOLOL

Ive never read them, I learned them as long as I stayed here =P

But I dont think I did anything bad T_T

 

[Jas0n]

[2:35pm] Jeremy: so Jas0n, how long do you think you should be banned for?
[2:36pm] Jas0n: As I've said before, 2 day suspension and if I take it as a joke and continue, then a week, and joke/continue a month ;D
[2:37pm] Jeremy: 2 days?
[2:37pm] Jeremy: you have contradicted yourself
[2:37pm] Jeremy: that is the minimum suspension
[2:38pm] Jeremy: since you would be going to 40%, it would be a week on our normal scale
[2:38pm] Jeremy: a month on your proposed one

[19:39] Jas0n: A week then
[19:39] Jas0n: And no sir, you aren't reading again
[19:39] Jas0n: I said if I take the suspension as a joke and continue doing what I was doing before

 

[Jeremy]

[2:41pm] Jeremy: Jas0n, you would already be permabanned
[2:41pm] Jas0n: So why aren't I?
[2:41pm] Jeremy: because we have a reasonable system

 

[Jas0n]

[2:41pm] Jeremy: Jas0n, you would already be permabanned
[2:41pm] Jas0n: So why aren't I?
[2:41pm] Jeremy: because we have a reasonable system

[19:42] Jeremy: because we have a reasonable system
[19:42] Jas0n: But you just said that I would be permabanned ;S.
[19:43] Jeremy: If I decided to listen to you
[19:43] Jas0n: Well then maybe you should, because surely someone who flames as much as shouldn't be on these forums :O

 

[Jeremy]

Average ban is about 3 days, so you think we should make that a week? Turn the week bans into a month? And turn the month bans into a year?

Hm... maybe more along the lines of this:

If you've been warned 2 times (depending on the seriousness of the offense, you will either be banned for three days or warned.

If you've been warned 3 (2+ the 1) or more times in a consecutive period of two months, then you will be banned for a week.

Any further bans/suspensions will be discussed among the staff.

Does that work? I know it's a bit rough, but that could be the basis.

We are already more strict than this because we don't worry about the "within two months" thing... so you have apparently also contradicted yourself :/