Propaganda Man
Senior Member
Okay....Well just talk about why people don't use "whom" as much as "who".stormcommander said:
-
TBT's 2026 New Year's Party has started! Join us from now until January 11th in eight fun New Year's activities. Earn currency to spend on collectibles and raffle tickets. Get started in The Bulletin Board event thread. Happy New Year!
I'm going to make a new Red Rock board.
- Thread starter Propaganda Man
- Start date
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2005
- Posts
- 17,594
- Bells
- 937
- Countdown Coins
- 171
- Lucky Tickets
- 1
- Switch
- 4135-9919-0984
Well, it's 1k to change the title/description, but I suppose we could cut that cost by making the title/description simply something that says it's a board that's topic changes all the time. Storm, would changing something small like 'The current topic is: xxx" count as free?
And then it's 800 bells to clear the thing, but if it's for a board that changes all the time it'd be better to just get them moved over to the videogames board.
It could work out.
And then it's 800 bells to clear the thing, but if it's for a board that changes all the time it'd be better to just get them moved over to the videogames board.
It could work out.
You're saying if it's not about politics or religion it's not "serious discussion"? Oh please...Propaganda Man said:Okay....Well just talk about why people don't use "whom" as much as "who".stormcommander said:
And honestly... we've had one of these boards in the past (official invite board). The problem is that there aren't enough members who would be able to discuss logically and maturely (which is why it's not around anymore, just slowly died out). That's what usually happens when a board is mostly teenagers anyway... I hate ageism, but it's true.
Propaganda Man
Senior Member
He'd probably make it 100 bells per character.Justin125 said:
Propaganda Man
Senior Member
How many were invited to that? Also, I'm willing to bet that there is a demand for serious discussion. Hell, I could link you to 5 threads about this.stormcommander said:You're saying if it's not about politics or religion it's not "serious discussion"? Oh please...Propaganda Man said:Okay....Well just talk about why people don't use "whom" as much as "who".stormcommander said:
And honestly... we've had one of these boards in the past (official invite board). The problem is that there aren't enough members who would be able to discuss logically and maturely (which is why it's not around anymore, just slowly died out). That's what usually happens when a board is mostly teenagers anyway... I hate ageism, but it's true.
Really, Storm.
Also, fix the damn economy.
Propaganda Man
Senior Member
http://www.thatdoesnothelp.com/stormcommander said:
Propaganda Man said:How many were invited to that? Also, I'm willing to bet that there is a demand for serious discussion. Hell, I could ]stormcommander said:You're saying if it's not about politics or religion it's not "serious discussion"? Oh please...Propaganda Man said:Okay....Well just talk about why people don't use "whom" as much as "who".stormcommander said:
And honestly... we've had one of these boards in the past (official invite board). The problem is that there aren't enough members who would be able to discuss logically and maturely (which is why it's not around anymore, just slowly died out). That's what usually happens when a board is mostly teenagers anyway... I hate ageism, but it's true.
So you're saying since people want it, they are probably good enough to discuss it?
And the "economy" is almost as good as it's going to get with this current system. I'm sure there are things we can do to help it, but it's obviously not at the top of my to do list.
Actually, it's true. We DID have a serious discussion board. Invited around 10 people there, I think... could have been a little less. It was pretty good at first, but then it slowly died out.
Propaganda Man
Senior Member
stormcommander said:A person needs to be a certain value to discuss something?Propaganda Man said:How many were invited to that? Also, I'm willing to bet that there is a demand for serious discussion. Hell, I could ]stormcommander said:You're saying if it's not about politics or religion it's not "serious discussion"? Oh please...Propaganda Man said:Okay....Well just talk about why people don't use "whom" as much as "who".stormcommander said:
And honestly... we've had one of these boards in the past (official invite board). The problem is that there aren't enough members who would be able to discuss logically and maturely (which is why it's not around anymore, just slowly died out). That's what usually happens when a board is mostly teenagers anyway... I hate ageism, but it's true.
So you're saying since people want it, they are probably good enough to discuss it?
And the "economy" is almost as good as it's going to get with this current system. I'm sure there are things we can do to help it, but it's obviously not at the top of my to do list.
The inflation on this board is out of control. Take the bell system out if you need to and stop giving it away for posts. It's simple really. Bells should be scarce. NF did a great job of it.
Propaganda Man
Senior Member
How long ago was that?Bulerias said:
I wouldn't mind it.
Propaganda Man
Senior Member
6? Geez. How many members are here?stormcommander said:
Why would we invite people for the sake of inviting people? We only invited people who were mature for the most part and could at least discuss things logically. And this was... probably a year ago. We still didn't discuss religion in it though.Propaganda Man said:
Fabioisonfire
total a-hole
Serious discussion board = good.
Propaganda Man
Senior Member
6 though. Did you really expect to have something active with 6 people participating? Look at the Sage boards!stormcommander said:
TwilightKing
Senior Member
I could see it working. And as Storm said, serious discussion isn't all politics and religion, and if this board had all serious discussion , even with light politics and the such, it could work.
Similar threads
