I will NOT donate a chicken, goat or duck

RockmanEXE said:
Just so some random child can eat it.

Has anyone else seen those ads?

ANIMAL ABUSE
You do know what some Arabs/Iraqis/etc. do with goats. Don't you? And I'm not being racist here, I'm serious.
 
Bacon Boy said:
RockmanEXE said:
Just so some random child can eat it.

Has anyone else seen those ads?

ANIMAL ABUSE
You do know what some Arabs/Iraqis/etc. do with goats. Don't you? And I'm not being racist here, I'm serious.
Iraqi's don't have goats, unless they're farmers, which is a low percent of the population.
 
pear40 said:
Bacon Boy said:
RockmanEXE said:
Just so some random child can eat it.

Has anyone else seen those ads?

ANIMAL ABUSE
You do know what some Arabs/Iraqis/etc. do with goats. Don't you? And I'm not being racist here, I'm serious.
Iraqi's don't have goats, unless they're farmers, which is a low percent of the population.
Note the subtle "Arabs/" in front of Iraqis.
 
As I said before, I will not donate a poor defenseless animal to some child just so he can eat it
 
RockmanEXE said:
As I said before, I will not donate a poor defenseless animal to some child just so he can eat it
BUT HE WANTS TO DEVOUR A LIVE CHICKEN, BUT HE CAN'T AFFORD IT.
 
RockmanEXE said:
As I said before, I will not donate a poor defenseless animal to some child just so he can eat it
Although the child is more valued, and is equal and is probably starving.

You're such a great person.
 
nephewjack said:
pear40 said:
Bacon Boy said:
RockmanEXE said:
Just so some random child can eat it.

Has anyone else seen those ads?

ANIMAL ABUSE
You do know what some Arabs/Iraqis/etc. do with goats. Don't you? And I'm not being racist here, I'm serious.
Iraqi's don't have goats, unless they're farmers, which is a low percent of the population.
Note the subtle "Arabs/" in front of Iraqis.
Don't mock my nitpicking. :P
 
RockmanEXE said:
As I said before, I will not donate a poor defenseless animal to some child just so he can eat it
With the logic, you're saying you would rather let a poor defenseless child starve to death.

The world will be such a better place with one less kid and one more goat, eh?
 
Trikki said:
RockmanEXE said:
As I said before, I will not donate a poor defenseless animal to some child just so he can eat it
With the logic, you're saying you would rather let a poor defenseless child starve to death.

The world will be such a better place with one less kid and one more goat, eh?
I'm saying, they could eat something else or just put the ad somewhere else.
 
RockmanEXE said:
Trikki said:
RockmanEXE said:
As I said before, I will not donate a poor defenseless animal to some child just so he can eat it
With the logic, you're saying you would rather let a poor defenseless child starve to death.

The world will be such a better place with one less kid and one more goat, eh?
I'm saying, they could eat something else or just put the ad somewhere else.
What else is there to eat if they're defenseless and have no one to feed them?
 
Alecks said:
RockmanEXE said:
Trikki said:
RockmanEXE said:
As I said before, I will not donate a poor defenseless animal to some child just so he can eat it
With the logic, you're saying you would rather let a poor defenseless child starve to death.

The world will be such a better place with one less kid and one more goat, eh?
I'm saying, they could eat something else or just put the ad somewhere else.
What else is there to eat if they're defenseless and have no one to feed them?
Their own limbs.
 
nephewjack said:
Alecks said:
RockmanEXE said:
Trikki said:
RockmanEXE said:
As I said before, I will not donate a poor defenseless animal to some child just so he can eat it
With the logic, you're saying you would rather let a poor defenseless child starve to death.

The world will be such a better place with one less kid and one more goat, eh?
I'm saying, they could eat something else or just put the ad somewhere else.
What else is there to eat if they're defenseless and have no one to feed them?
Their own limbs.
Which isn't as valuable as goats, apparently.
 
RockmanEXE said:
Trikki said:
RockmanEXE said:
As I said before, I will not donate a poor defenseless animal to some child just so he can eat it
With the logic, you're saying you would rather let a poor defenseless child starve to death.

The world will be such a better place with one less kid and one more goat, eh?
I'm saying, they could eat something else or just put the ad somewhere else.
If they could be eating something else there wouldn't be a point for the ads.
 
Back
Top