I don't know whether to be happy or mad...

[UltraByte]

Happy: MAY 22 2008

Mad: Shia LeBeouf is supposed to be in it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoU3abwotQs&NR=1

 

[Fanghorn]

Manly man, man man man. MANILYEST MAN!. XD


Haha Harison Ford will wrinkle up by the time its done.

 

[Jeremy]

I can't wait. =D

But come on, Shia LeBeouf isn't a bad actor...

But OMG, their shooting part of it here in CT! For some reason I think I remember someone telling me about that a long time ago. And it might even be a town near me. =O I should be an extra =D

 

[Jeremy]

Oh, the thing in CT is at Yale, which is like over an hour away from me.

 

[UltraByte]

Oh, the thing in CT is at Yale, which is like over an hour away from me.

WTH. NOT FAIR. ;_;

Actually, you're too late. They already did the extra casting.

 

[Propaganda Man]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

 

[Jeremy]

Oh, the thing in CT is at Yale, which is like over an hour away from me.

WTH. NOT FAIR. ;_;

Actually, you're too late. They already did the extra casting.

Heh... I wouldn't really want to do it anyway. Why have a part in a movie when I can be HERE AT TBTz WITH YOU GUYZ!!!1

 

[UltraByte]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

How do you know it'll be 'horrible'?

 

[Propaganda Man]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

How do you know it'll be 'horrible'?

For example, look at the newer star wars movies made.

 

[UltraByte]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

How do you know it'll be 'horrible'?

For example, look at the newer star wars movies made.

Star Wars and Indiana Jones are two extremely different movies.

 

[Propaganda Man]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

How do you know it'll be 'horrible'?

For example, look at the newer star wars movies made.

Star Wars and Indiana Jones are two extremely different movies.

I'm not talking about the content. Lucas is going to have a hand in the Jones and he made the Star Wars ones.

They butcher it will special effects and crappy acting.

 

[UltraByte]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

How do you know it'll be 'horrible'?

For example, look at the newer star wars movies made.

Star Wars and Indiana Jones are two extremely different movies.

I'm not talking about the content. Lucas is going to have a hand in the Jones and he made the Star Wars ones.

They butcher it will special effects and crappy acting.

I'm hoping that they don't use special effects... Maybe for only certain things, but for action scenes and whatnot should stay true to the original movies, which used the 'backyard' effects.

 

[Jeremy]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

How do you know it'll be 'horrible'?

For example, look at the newer star wars movies made.

Those were good. People underrated them.

 

[Propaganda Man]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

How do you know it'll be 'horrible'?

For example, look at the newer star wars movies made.

Star Wars and Indiana Jones are two extremely different movies.

I'm not talking about the content. Lucas is going to have a hand in the Jones and he made the Star Wars ones.

They butcher it will special effects and crappy acting.

I'm hoping that they don't use special effects... Maybe for only certain things, but for action scenes and whatnot should stay true to the original movies, which used the 'backyard' effects.

Spielberg and Lucas latest movies were either remakes or orginials but they all had special effects.

 

[Propaganda Man]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

How do you know it'll be 'horrible'?

For example, look at the newer star wars movies made.

Those were good. People underrated them.

The acting was *CEN-2.1-SORD*.

 

[Jeremy]

So some of the acting was meh, ok? Who cares! It's awesomeness overpowers that.

 

[UltraByte]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

How do you know it'll be 'horrible'?

For example, look at the newer star wars movies made.

Star Wars and Indiana Jones are two extremely different movies.

I'm not talking about the content. Lucas is going to have a hand in the Jones and he made the Star Wars ones.

They butcher it will special effects and crappy acting.

I'm hoping that they don't use special effects... Maybe for only certain things, but for action scenes and whatnot should stay true to the original movies, which used the 'backyard' effects.

Spielberg and Lucas latest movies were either remakes or orginials but they all had special effects.

Yeah, but those movies depended on special effects.

 

[Propaganda Man]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

How do you know it'll be 'horrible'?

For example, look at the newer star wars movies made.

Star Wars and Indiana Jones are two extremely different movies.

I'm not talking about the content. Lucas is going to have a hand in the Jones and he made the Star Wars ones.

They butcher it will special effects and crappy acting.

I'm hoping that they don't use special effects... Maybe for only certain things, but for action scenes and whatnot should stay true to the original movies, which used the 'backyard' effects.

Spielberg and Lucas latest movies were either remakes or orginials but they all had special effects.

Yeah, but those movies depended on special effects.

My point.

 

[Propaganda Man]

So some of the acting was meh, ok? Who cares! It's awesomeness overpowers that.

When Ben sees the children die he has a straight face and indifferently says that its horrible. The only time you see emotion is when he is happy, mad, and sad.

 

[UltraByte]

Why would they try to ruin a classic?

How do you know it'll be 'horrible'?

For example, look at the newer star wars movies made.

Star Wars and Indiana Jones are two extremely different movies.

I'm not talking about the content. Lucas is going to have a hand in the Jones and he made the Star Wars ones.

They butcher it will special effects and crappy acting.

I'm hoping that they don't use special effects... Maybe for only certain things, but for action scenes and whatnot should stay true to the original movies, which used the 'backyard' effects.

Spielberg and Lucas latest movies were either remakes or orginials but they all had special effects.

Yeah, but those movies depended on special effects.

My point.

....wha? We're talking about Indiana Jones, which barely uses any special effects.