first person shooters

Seriously, I am not even a little bit excited for this game right now. And that trailer was not "orgasmic" in any way, all it was was a teaser that didn't show anything of any importance.
 
Haha no offense but the trailer looked like it was made by David xD

BOOM BOOM LIGHTING BOOM BOOM BANG FIRE BOOM LIGHTING LIGHT LIGHTING!
 
SSgt. Garrett said:
Haha no offense but the trailer looked like it was made by David xD

BOOM BOOM LIGHTING BOOM BOOM BANG FIRE BOOM LIGHTING LIGHT LIGHTING!
rofl no offense, its something id do. :p there was a ridiculous amount of film burn in there. :p
 
David said:
SSgt. Garrett said:
Haha no offense but the trailer looked like it was made by David xD

BOOM BOOM LIGHTING BOOM BOOM BANG FIRE BOOM LIGHTING LIGHT LIGHTING!
rofl no offense, its something id do. :p there was a ridiculous amount of film burn in there. :p
Yeah...You already know I don't like that. haha
 
TravisTouchdown said:
Tyeforce said:
Gnome said:
Pokemon shows animal fights.
First of all, they're not animals, they're creatures born to fight. And they don't kill each other, just knock each other out.
http://www.onemanga.com/Pokemon_Special/14/12/
That would be the manga, not associated with the games at all. It's not made by Nintendo or Game Freak, so it's not canon, and that's not what happens in the games. And even if it was, it's not much different than animals killing each other in nature. But it's not like people are shooting them with guns.
 
This topic is full of craziness and bad arguments.

And, wtf at comparing video games to killing people.
 
Rawburt said:
This topic is full of craziness and bad arguments.

And, wtf at comparing video games to killing people.
Because that's what you do in some video games; kill people. It may be virtual, but that doesn't make it right.
 
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
This topic is full of craziness and bad arguments.

And, wtf at comparing video games to killing people.
Because that's what you do in some video games; kill people. It may be virtual, but that doesn't make it right.
True
 
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
This topic is full of craziness and bad arguments.

And, wtf at comparing video games to killing people.
Because that's what you do in some video games; kill people. It may be virtual, but that doesn't make it right.
Haha, so everyone that plays FPSs are psychos since they enjoy killing things virtually and they're so similar, am I right?
 
Rawburt said:
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
This topic is full of craziness and bad arguments.

And, wtf at comparing video games to killing people.
Because that's what you do in some video games; kill people. It may be virtual, but that doesn't make it right.
Haha, so everyone that plays FPSs are psychos since they enjoy killing things virtually and they're so similar, am I right?
this is what tye makes people who play FPS' out to be, by his terms 3/4 of my school must be psychos.
 
That is true your school is full off psychos. Tye and I are right!
 
Rawburt said:
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
This topic is full of craziness and bad arguments.

And, wtf at comparing video games to killing people.
Because that's what you do in some video games; kill people. It may be virtual, but that doesn't make it right.
Haha, so everyone that plays FPSs are psychos since they enjoy killing things virtually and they're so similar, am I right?
I didn't say that. No, playing shooters doesn't make you a murderer. But the question is, why would anyone want to kill someone at all, be it in real life or virtually?!
 
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
This topic is full of craziness and bad arguments.

And, wtf at comparing video games to killing people.
Because that's what you do in some video games; kill people. It may be virtual, but that doesn't make it right.
Haha, so everyone that plays FPSs are psychos since they enjoy killing things virtually and they're so similar, am I right?
I didn't say that. No, playing shooters doesn't make you a murderer. But the question is, why would anyone want to kill someone at all, be it in real life or virtually?!
why would you want drive a goombas spinal cord into his feet? and cause him to explode into hundreds of particles of smoke? why would you want to electrocute animals with 1000s of volts of electricity?
 
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
This topic is full of craziness and bad arguments.

And, wtf at comparing video games to killing people.
Because that's what you do in some video games; kill people. It may be virtual, but that doesn't make it right.
Haha, so everyone that plays FPSs are psychos since they enjoy killing things virtually and they're so similar, am I right?
I didn't say that. No, playing shooters doesn't make you a murderer. But the question is, why would anyone want to kill someone at all, be it in real life or virtually?!
Because people are aggressive by nature. There's nothing wrong with that on it's own and it's not just something that goes away, and hey games can actually make you use it in a healthy way.

And you can't compare the humans you kill in games to people in real life, they have no souls, no history, nothing, they're just obstacles you have to overcome in the game, they're just the same thing every game adds in for challenge, just giving them human shapes doesn't make them human.

When it comes down to it, people who play them just like tense situations, fun toys and things to use it on, there's no moral dilemma playing games.

I don't even like FPS's either, they are not my type of game, but to imply that it's morally wrong to play them is just not true. Just because you don't see the value of something doesn't mean nothing but bad things can come of it.
 
David said:
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
Tyeforce said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
Haha, so everyone that plays FPSs are psychos since they enjoy killing things virtually and they're so similar, am I right?
I didn't say that. No, playing shooters doesn't make you a murderer. But the question is, why would anyone want to kill someone at all, be it in real life or virtually?!
why would you want drive a goombas spinal cord into his feet? and cause him to explode into hundreds of particles of smoke? why would you want to electrocute animals with 1000s of volts of electricity?
Again, you completely disregard my previous post. Here, since you can't seem to remember, I'll post it again for your convenience:
Tyeforce said:
It doesn't matter if it's virtual or not. No, it's not actually murder if it's virtual, but it's the principle of it. I'm not going to spend my time brutally killing virtual people, even if they're not real. And don't even compare killing humans to stomping on Goombas like you've done before. That's completely different. Not only are Goombas, and the rest of the Mario universe, non-realistic, unlike games like Call of Duty, but they're also not humans. They're monsters. When someone kills a monster, they're depicted as a hero, but when someone kills another human being, they've committed murder and are considered a criminal. That's because monsters are evil, humans are not. Yes, there can be evil humans, but most humans aren't, and the vast majority of humans that you kill in video games aren't truly evil. They're not monsters. Goombas are just that; they're Bowser's evil minions. And there's about just as many Goombas as there are mosquitoes. Don't tell me you think that killing a mosquito is considered murder. Point is, I wouldn't ever want to kill a human being, so why the hell would I want to do it in a video game? Plus I hate guns.
Plus, what you described never happens in such a graphic way. But in shooter games like Call of Duty, brutal stuff like that does happen, blood and all. It's horrible.
 
Rawburt said:
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
Tyeforce said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
Haha, so everyone that plays FPSs are psychos since they enjoy killing things virtually and they're so similar, am I right?
I didn't say that. No, playing shooters doesn't make you a murderer. But the question is, why would anyone want to kill someone at all, be it in real life or virtually?!
Because people are aggressive by nature. There's nothing wrong with that on it's own and it's not just something that goes away, and hey games can actually make you use it in a healthy way.

And you can't compare the humans you kill in games to people in real life, they have no souls, no history, nothing, they're just obstacles you have to overcome in the game, they're just the same thing every game adds in for challenge, just giving them human shapes doesn't make them human.

When it comes down to it, people who play them just like tense situations, fun toys and things to use it on, there's no moral dilemma playing games.

I don't even like FPS's either, they are not my type of game, but to imply that it's morally wrong to play them is just not true. Just because you don't see the value of something doesn't mean nothing but bad things can come of it.
i play because theyre fun, theyre not real, and its just cool for me to be able to be a special ops/marine/ranger. the guns they use are cool, their tactics are cool, the gadgets they have are cool, its just all around cool/fun for me. it also lets me appreciate what these guys actually do in real life. and playing call of duty world at war actually helped me better understand what my grandfather went through as a kid, and even my great grandfather, he was a sniper for the german army, he killed 36 men. and like you said rob, none of its real, and the people arent real. i also really enjoy the storys written behind all these game, and i like the adrenaline rushes that the almighty multiplayer gives you.
 
Back
Top