Tbh I don't care of what people care about my villagers they're my babies and I love them in my town and that's what matters to me not what other people think of my villagers
When I first started my town, I had little to no higher-tiers.
I think the highest was maybe Goldie.
I really miss them. I built relationships with them, and built my AC life up with them.
I have all their pictures, and refuse to sell them because that's the last I have of them.
I really wanted to experience new villagers, but I'll love and miss them always...
Sucks that we can't have more space for more villagers lol
I don't do that, so
Phil is my fave and I don't care who knows. Fight me, punks!
EDIT:// Well, tbh, sometimes when we do those little 'rank' things, like 'what tier is your village?' and mine ends up on the lower end of the spectrum just because I have animals like Puck and Phil in my town, it is a little embarrassing or sad to think that it's not the quality of my town deciding the tier, but my preference in citizens..
I have a lot of low tiers in my town. I picked villagers that I liked regardless of tier. Just because a villager is ranked higher on the tiers than another doesn't mean they're any better/worse. It just means a lot more people like certain villagers. I have nothing against top tiers (I've had several) but I don't think people should get certain villagers just because they're popular.
Some of my dreamies are lower tiered. I love them cuz they are adorkable. I would show them off to my friends whenever they came over.
I'm an Egbert's admirer 4 ever.
I'll admit, I've been embarrassed of my villagers before, but when I get to talk to all of my dreamies everyday, I know I'd turn down any other villager, regardless of rank. Honestly, the tier 5 villagers that I cycle have left a bigger mark on my heart than any tier 1. It's not wrong for people to like tier 1s, as long as they like them for more than their rank.
No way I love my lower tier villagers. I've never heard of anyone judging someone else's villagers but I wouldn't care if they did. I didn't even know there were tiers until I saw the list a few weeks ago, if I'm being honest.
Rodney, Hamphrey, Hamlet, Graham, Apple, Soleil, Clay are my baes. And Flurry, but she's not really low tier.. Oh man. And Hazel. Uni-wow. Yeah, honestly, I really like the lower tier ones.
Never. I'd be more embarrassed to have a town full of popular villagers lol. Half my town is tier five, including my top three favorites (Gladys, Hazel, and Roscoe <3). My planned villagers for my second town include 6 tier fives as well.
HECK NO! All villagers deserve love no matter WHAT! Besides, does it even matter that much? There's so many villagers that some are bound to be popular or not so popular.
You know, it's your village. Don't get rid of a villager you like just because he's not "popular". Why should anyone care anyway? I shouldn't have to feel bad because I have mostly "popular" villagers. And you shouldn't feel bad for having unpopular villagers. It's YOUR game and you should enjoy it. Don't worry about what other people think. I don't care about popularity. I like my villagers...because I like then. Plain and simple. If you like your villagers don't send them packing because their popularity is low.
Agreed!
As it happens, I had Erik at the start and found him kind of annoying...he grew on me
And most of my faves are middle to lower tier.
All of my dreamies are villagers that I loved from City Folk and the original Animal Crossing. I miss my Kiki and Olivia!