if the tiny home is not on wheels, has proper plumbing/electricity/insulation, is up to code, and I own the land that it sits on (and hopefully a bit of land around it), then I'd probably pick the tiny house! I kinda wish I could actually have a tiny home like that but it's still too expensive for me. I'd want a shed for extra storage outside the tiny home.
A palace would have a lot of utility bills and upkeep costs and all that. I'd struggle to fill a single room with stuff let alone the whole palace.. but it would be fun to like, rollerskate around an empty palace all day every day so that'd be kinda nice
Tiny house. Easier and faster to clean. It also encourages not having much stuff. Cheaper. And maybe it can be on land that I can build a duck coop for
A nice quaint house, something lovely and cozy to relax and unwind in. I think a palace would be way too stressful to maintain/upkeep and I am a terrible interior decorator so you can count on me not ever decorating it properly either lol
Tiny house since I like things to be clean and maintaining an entire palace seems...stressful! I'd prefer something a bit larger than a tiny house, though. I like my space.
If I don't have to share it with anyone I'll take the tiny house, but if anyone else is living there then I will need a palace because I need space to have my own personal space
A palace would be too hard to upkeep and I'd realistically use very little of it (and good lord, the taxes), so I'd say tiny house. I don't think it would be ideal for me in the long-term (neither would a palace ahaha), but for where I am now in life at least, I think I could live relatively comfortably in one.