That was the only part of Animal Crossing that gave me anxiety haha.When I was a kid, I think I cried ugly crying when one of my villagers up and left lol
With due respect I see where you're coming from but here was the issue for how it was in the old games. Whenever you come back after not playing for so long the game just picks whatever villager to move out by random so it could be your favorite villager of all time. At the time its like they left without even saying a word. You got a letter and sure it was kinda nice to see them at least write to you so they didn't just like leave or say anything but still it would not be great if it was your favorite villager.I know most people like this...but, I'm honestly not a fan of it.
If the game did move villagers out while you weren't playing, it would accomplish two things. 1) It would force people to play so that it wouldn't happen to them. (I suspect that the people who have dream villagers like to play every single day anyway). And 2) It would keep the game fresh for people who get burnt out on it. Imagine taking a couple months off...you come back, and half of your villagers are new. It would definitely be a nice change of pace.
For me, the problem is not everyone has the luxury of being able to play all the time. And while I could see how it could keep things fresh, I would personally be sad if my favs like Elmer and Papi just got up and left.I know most people like this...but, I'm honestly not a fan of it.
If the game did move villagers out while you weren't playing, it would accomplish two things. 1) It would force people to play so that it wouldn't happen to them. (I suspect that the people who have dream villagers like to play every single day anyway). And 2) It would keep the game fresh for people who get burnt out on it. Imagine taking a couple months off...you come back, and half of your villagers are new. It would definitely be a nice change of pace.
This too! I love the fact that now if it's a villager who I want to have stay, I could simply ignore them, and wait to see if the bubble transfers to another villager the next day. It's genuinely so useful (for me at least, given that I don't TT)If it played like the old games where it would just pick any random villager to move out it would get annoying fast. With the new one you have the option of picking which villagers are thinking of moving out. You can tell them to say if it was your favorite but If you really want them to go then you can let them go.
I don't... I don't get why you'd want a game to force you to play. I play when I want to play, and don't when I don't. I HATE games where I feel obligated to play regularly. It's a game, not a job. I'm supposed to play it for fun and not because I need to.I know most people like this...but, I'm honestly not a fan of it.
If the game did move villagers out while you weren't playing, it would accomplish two things. 1) It would force people to play so that it wouldn't happen to them. (I suspect that the people who have dream villagers like to play every single day anyway). And 2) It would keep the game fresh for people who get burnt out on it. Imagine taking a couple months off...you come back, and half of your villagers are new. It would definitely be a nice change of pace.
In a world where I didnt have his amiibo, if I went on the game and Tybalt had moved out while I was gone, I would probably stop playing.I know most people like this...but, I'm honestly not a fan of it.
If the game did move villagers out while you weren't playing, it would accomplish two things. 1) It would force people to play so that it wouldn't happen to them. (I suspect that the people who have dream villagers like to play every single day anyway). And 2) It would keep the game fresh for people who get burnt out on it. Imagine taking a couple months off...you come back, and half of your villagers are new. It would definitely be a nice change of pace.
I know most people like this...but, I'm honestly not a fan of it.
If the game did move villagers out while you weren't playing, it would accomplish two things. 1) It would force people to play so that it wouldn't happen to them. (I suspect that the people who have dream villagers like to play every single day anyway). And 2) It would keep the game fresh for people who get burnt out on it. Imagine taking a couple months off...you come back, and half of your villagers are new. It would definitely be a nice change of pace.
I had an issue with Keaton as well. He completely ruined a section of my bamboo forest, and the worst part was that he never ended up leaving before I deleted the town. Quite infuriating I literally forget about those issues in New Horizons just because they don't happen at all. Nintendo made a good move changing that.I'm so happy they did this in Horizons. In New Leaf I had a villager randomly move out, and the new villager plopped their house in the worst spot ever.
It ruined my park. Hybrids gone that I had worked so hard to get, and half of the park bench was right behind their house. It looked aweful. I had to pay bells to destroy the bench and two street lamps. Plus, I wasn't time traveling, so it took a few days to fix. It was Molly who caused me so much stress. Lol.
Keaton plopped his house in front of my bridge. I tried moving the bridge, but Isabelle wouldn't let me put it ANYWHERE. It's too close to Keaton's house she said. This was frustrating because the game put his house in front of it, but wouldn't let me place it just a bit farther away from it. Goofy.
I haven't had too many stressful moments in Horizons like I did in New leaf. The only time I've been stressed in Horizons is when I'm trying to get all the seasonal recipes from balloons.