Whew, this blew up! Let's get to it. Danielkang, looking at your profile, you're
super young (i.e. you're 12)... So I'll try to be nice.
I mean don't even risk it if you don't have what it takes to take care of the biproduct of your actions.
This brings up a philosophical question that's actually pretty interesting: Is consent to an action necessarily consent to all possible consequences? Legally, sure - we often sign contracts saying we understand risks before we undergo potentially deadly actions - but morally, and in real-life application, I don't think it holds up. Say you go bungee jumping, and your line snaps; do we say 'well, you just shouldn't have done that risky thing'? Say you start getting frisky with a partner, and they push you further than you want to go; do we say 'well, you should have known that would be the outcome'?
We don't, of course! We call those 'an unfortunate tragedy' and 'sexual assault,' respectively.
No, the pregnant person does not die. The unborn child does that's what's different. If both or either would die based on decision then that changes things.
I can tell you've never seen a pregnancy go wrong. Multiple women in my family had to be placed on bed-rest for the majority of their (wanted) pregnancies, or
they would die. My fiancee's mother nearly died in childbirth.
Over 50,000 US women a year experience what's known as "severe maternal morbidity," or severe pregnancy complications, and the number is rising. It's disrespectful to women who have died during pregnancy, women who have had troubled pregnancies, and women who have had to discontinue wanted pregnancies to say 'well, pregnant people don't die, so it's okay.'
Biologically speaking the man has no responsibility
I still dont think its right but yeah.
I don't know where you got that from, but nah. Evolutionarily, men do have a responsibility to ensure their children's survival - if all their children die, they won't pass on their genes, obviously. (That's a major simplification, but whatever. Altruism likely goes beyond kin selection, too.) Furthermore, a lot of things are 'natural' that we wouldn't consider moral. My thoughts on that, though, are really complicated and would take an entire thesis to describe.
Furthermore, you never really addressed my point regarding mandatory organ transplants. I'd like to see your answer to that, if you have one!
--And an aside:
please don't listen to the other guy. birth control pills are horrible for you and severely mess with your hormones and body.
Eh. Of course they mess with your hormones; you're literally ingesting estrogen. This can increase your risk of cervical breast cancer, and it's really bad for people who get migraines with aura (you're at increased risk for stroke!). That said, some people have medical issues relating to hormone balance and rely on hormonal birth control to balance it; for example, I get debilitating menstrual migraines
without aura, which birth control helps to resolve. A lot of women take estradiol during menopause, too, or during transition for trans women. Birth control pills actually reduce your risk of ovarian cancer, too! A blanket statement that hormonal birth control is 'horrible for you' doesn't really hold up.