The Legend of Zelda Timeline

[Thunder]

http://wii.ign.com/articles/121/1215301p1.html

Thoughts?

 

[Jake]

I read the first sentence and clicked the link that took me to the art book article, I never knew of this. I couldn't care less about the time line haha

 

[Trent the Paladin]

I don't see how a third split is possible honestly. :L Ninty needs to clarify big time.

 

[Ciaran]

That makes sense, I guess.

 

[Bacon Boy]

The third split is when he doesn't beat Ganon? But that's impossible. There's no scenario in OoT where you can fail to beat Ganon. Even after you die, you come back to fight him.

 

[Brad]

Well, at least there will be no more speculating...

 

[Trent the Paladin]

Well, at least there will be no more speculating...

People are rejecting this timeline, your statement is false.

 

[Ciaran]

The third split is when he doesn't beat Ganon? But that's impossible. There's no scenario in OoT where you can fail to beat Ganon. Even after you die, you come back to fight him.

If you go to my ocarina of time, you'll see link stuck in the fire temple.

 

[Bacon Boy]

If you go to my ocarina of time, you'll see link stuck in the fire temple.

Ciaran single-handedly created a separate timeline! D:

 

[Trent the Paladin]

http://media.wii.ign.com/media/872/872155/img_8781403.html <-- Sheds some more light... still don't like it. :/

 

[Zex]

I always thought that Wind Waker could take place on either adult or young timeline after OOT, but never by itself

 

[Brad]

The third split is when he doesn't beat Ganon? But that's impossible. There's no scenario in OoT where you can fail to beat Ganon. Even after you die, you come back to fight him.

There could be a third split because it's like a what-if story.

 

[Bacon Boy]

There could be a third split because it's like a what-if story.

It just seems like NIntendo's way of saying "We really didn't think this through, so... here!"