medal of honor

David

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Posts
2,372
Bells
1,050
IGN, go *censored.3.0* yourself, this game is pretty fun, I just gave it a rent cause I was unsure but I'll probably end up buying it now. Anyone else play it yet?
 
all the rage is COD, and Med Honor was made for people who couldn't wait for the next gun game to come out (COD)
 
Medal of Honor is a terrible game, just admit it. You don't have to spend your money to prove to yourself that IGN is wrong when you know it in your heart.
 
I heard it spawns you in the middle of the battlefield only to get killed half a second later (aka horrible respawning or something along those lines) and that the choke points are so damn easy to defend.
laughing*****es.jpg
 
*trevor said:
Medal of Honor is a terrible game, just admit it. You don't have to spend your money to prove to yourself that IGN is wrong when you know it in your heart.
Go crawl in a hole and die.

IGN can go *censored.3.0* it's self. The single player was rather good in my opinion, the only problem I had with it was it's too short.

And I love online so much more than all of the *censored.3.0*en online shinanagins that go on in the pathetically immature COD players. Thanks COD for ruining all other FPS after you with your *censored.2.0*ty-ness.
 
VantagE said:
Go crawl in a hole and die.
gosh you are so pleasant aren't you??

you like *censored.2.0*ty games and tell people the end their lives when they call them out on how poorly made they are. you're such a winner!! :)
 
It looks like an ok game. The things stopping me from getting it are:

1. A very short campaign
2. The online can't really decide what it wants to be. It's kind of a blend between twitch reflex CoD and a more tactical, slow paced battlefield.
3. For the first time in my life, I've got 3 games I'm actively playing instead of 1. Minecraft, Halo Reach, and Fallout New Vegas. I honestly can't see it ripping me away from those for too much time.
 
Pear said:
It looks like an ok game. The things stopping me from getting it are:

1. A very short campaign
2. The online can't really decide what it wants to be. It's kind of a blend between twitch reflex CoD and a more tactical, slow paced battlefield.
3. For the first time in my life, I've got 3 games I'm actively playing instead of 1. Minecraft, Halo Reach, and Fallout New Vegas. I honestly can't see it ripping me away from those for too much time.
Haven't played it, but if you're expecting a long campaign for a shooter game, you're mistaken.
 
VantagE said:
*trevor said:
Medal of Honor is a terrible game, just admit it. You don't have to spend your money to prove to yourself that IGN is wrong when you know it in your heart.
Go crawl in a hole and die.

IGN can go *censored.3.0* it's self. The single player was rather good in my opinion, the only problem I had with it was it's too short.

And I love online so much more than all of the *censored.3.0*en online shinanagins that go on in the pathetically immature COD players. Thanks COD for ruining all other FPS after you with your *censored.2.0*ty-ness.
You call CoD players immature? That's a nice joke you have there when your opener is an attack saying he should go die. :gyroidsideways:
 
Tom said:
Pear said:
It looks like an ok game. The things stopping me from getting it are:

1. A very short campaign
2. The online can't really decide what it wants to be. It's kind of a blend between twitch reflex CoD and a more tactical, slow paced battlefield.
3. For the first time in my life, I've got 3 games I'm actively playing instead of 1. Minecraft, Halo Reach, and Fallout New Vegas. I honestly can't see it ripping me away from those for too much time.
Haven't played it, but if you're expecting a long campaign for a shooter game, you're mistaken.
Still, Halo Reach had a 12 hour campaign. This game's campaign is 3 hours.
 
Alright so after a bit more playing, honestly, its not a bad game, but its not great either, online gets a bit boring after a few hours and the single player is clunky and slow. I'll probably end up skipping the purchase, considering its going for 69.99. Halo Reach is still really fun and the map pack is coming out soon. plus, fable 3 and assassins creed are on their way. :)
 
VantagE said:
*trevor said:
Medal of Honor is a terrible game, just admit it. You don't have to spend your money to prove to yourself that IGN is wrong when you know it in your heart.
Go crawl in a hole and die.

IGN can go *censored.3.0* it's self. The single player was rather good in my opinion, the only problem I had with it was it's too short.

And I love online so much more than all of the *censored.3.0*en online shinanagins that go on in the pathetically immature COD players. Thanks COD for ruining all other FPS after you with your *censored.2.0*ty-ness.
I gotta ask, man...

umad?
 
Tom said:
Pear said:
It looks like an ok game. The things stopping me from getting it are:

1. A very short campaign
2. The online can't really decide what it wants to be. It's kind of a blend between twitch reflex CoD and a more tactical, slow paced battlefield.
3. For the first time in my life, I've got 3 games I'm actively playing instead of 1. Minecraft, Halo Reach, and Fallout New Vegas. I honestly can't see it ripping me away from those for too much time.
Haven't played it, but if you're expecting a long campaign for a shooter game, you're mistaken.
Wrong... it's only the popular console shooters that are really short these days. Halo, Gears, Call of Duty... all really short campaigns. But have you ever played, say, Half-Life 2?
 
Just beat the campaign, it got better once i got used to the clunkiness. pretty short though. might get some online achievements then return it.
 
*trevor said:
Tom said:
Pear said:
It looks like an ok game. The things stopping me from getting it are:

1. A very short campaign
2. The online can't really decide what it wants to be. It's kind of a blend between twitch reflex CoD and a more tactical, slow paced battlefield.
3. For the first time in my life, I've got 3 games I'm actively playing instead of 1. Minecraft, Halo Reach, and Fallout New Vegas. I honestly can't see it ripping me away from those for too much time.
Haven't played it, but if you're expecting a long campaign for a shooter game, you're mistaken.
Wrong... it's only the popular console shooters that are really short these days. Halo, Gears, Call of Duty... all really short campaigns. But have you ever played, say, Half-Life 2?
Haven't had a chance to yet. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Half-Life 2 all single player? Deathmatch being released a month or two after release?
 
//RUN.exe said:
VantagE said:
Go crawl in a hole and die.
gosh you are so pleasant aren't you??

you like *censored.2.0*ty games and tell people the end their lives when they call them out on how poorly made they are. you're such a winner!! :)
Apparently he doesn't know what a *censored.2.0*ty game is, because MoH isn't one of them.
 
Back
Top