I'd vote for him if he is a serious competitor (that is still unclear...)stormcommander said:Wow... voting for him, seriously... why?
Sporge27 said:Wow, I can't believe he filled out forms to run on the show now...
Funny, it would cost him $25,000 plus $10,000 late fee to run as a republican, and only $2,500 or 3000 signatures in South Carolina. What does that say about who a party represents.
He's a comedian. He's not even a real one, everything he ever does on his show is tongue-in-cheek. I'm not saying that's bad, but this whole presidential run was entirely done in an attempt to promote the show and as a running gag.Sporge27 said:Well either way he is out now it would seem, but cheapening the system? I say if it cheapens the system at all it just shows the flaws in it for more people to realize what really happens in these things.
The American election process.stormcommander said:Flaws in what?
Heh... well voting for a comedian wouldn't show that.Mino said:The American election process.stormcommander said:Flaws in what?
Just out of curiosity, what wouldn't it show?stormcommander said:Heh... well voting for a comedian wouldn't show that.Mino said:The American election process.stormcommander said:Flaws in what?
In reference to your first comment, I watched the same episode you did. Why not come up with your own ideas on things not just what you heard on that show.Sporge27 said:Oh well it certainly would get free publicity for the show, but at the same time I feel it is important to think of things like where the campaign money comes from. How a corporation cannot sponsor a candidate but the employees of a company can be urged to help donate to a candidate.
I understand it adds personal gain for him, but at the same time he has been trying to make things better in the world with his comedy, showing just how silly some people are when they are serious about some topics. I love how he mocks conservatives by agreeing with them. I realize his writers need just as much thanking for his witty banter but still I do like the guy a lot.
What I said regarding Colbert and conservatives is that he states he is republican on the show and he clearly isn't. Anti government, I suppose but that is more because you can't really make fun of what the government does well that often now can you? As for truth, "artists tell lies to reveal the truth while politicians tell lies to cover up the truth". The thing with comedy is that it can be so much more powerful than other forms of media. Sometimes people overlook what it can do.Mino said:In reference to your first comment, I watched the same episode you did. Why not come up with your own ideas on things not just what you heard on that show.
I think you need to re-assess both your views of Colbert and conservatives. First of all, his goal is to make people laugh, he's a comedian. And he does it very well. Sometimes though, the humor is only held up by his deadpan delivery and not by any particular well-written jokes. The Daily Show may seem like a liberal show, but in actuality, it is really anti-government, but the Republicans have been in control for most of the time he's been on the show. He describes himself as a socialist (bleh) in fact. The Colbert Report only has strength stand up as long as its running jokes last, and as long as the current administration stays in power.
But then again, the public is quite fickle, and they'll laugh at anything, no matter how obscure, unimportant, or untrue it is once the writers put a satirical spin on it.