How is it biased? >_>Rawburt said:While the article is too biased, it lists some undeniable merits of Nintendo, they make some pretty good games and their hardware is pretty durable, 15 year old systems still work great. And it did revive the industry.
Can't say I think they make the best games of all time, but for the most part I agree with the article.
The Nintendo makes the greatest games ever and everyone will eventually get tired of other companies games is very biased.Tyeforce said:How is it biased? >_>Rawburt said:While the article is too biased, it lists some undeniable merits of Nintendo, they make some pretty good games and their hardware is pretty durable, 15 year old systems still work great. And it did revive the industry.
Can't say I think they make the best games of all time, but for the most part I agree with the article.
^Pear said:First I was like, "wut."
Then, "Huh"
Then I lol'd.
^Rianco said:^Pear said:First I was like, "wut."
Then, "Huh"
Then I lol'd.
It doesn't say that everyone will eventually grow tired of every other game, just that Nintendo games tend to last much longer than most other games. When you still have people playing games from the 80s like Super Mario Bros. today, you gotta admit that Nintendo's games really do stand the test of time.Rawburt said:The Nintendo makes the greatest games ever and everyone will eventually get tired of other companies games is very biased.Tyeforce said:How is it biased? >_>Rawburt said:While the article is too biased, it lists some undeniable merits of Nintendo, they make some pretty good games and their hardware is pretty durable, 15 year old systems still work great. And it did revive the industry.
Can't say I think they make the best games of all time, but for the most part I agree with the article.
What are you getting defensive about though, I said the article had merits after all.
Jack made a smart.Jak said:Kayso. Opinions.
Durable: OK, sure. I don't honestly think that I'm going to think of them better because it's "OHSO DURABLE"
Hype: Sony and Microsoft get the same hype. Nothing special.
Best Games: BIASBIASBIAS
Accessible for all ages: That's a turn off for me. I don't want anymore shovelware games, or wagglefests for seniors and babies.
Unstoppable franchises: Valid point.
Miyamoto: Jesus Christ, enough of using him as an example. He's not behind every *censored.3.0*ing Nintendo game.
Revived Industry: Alright. I honestly don't really care, though, because I wasn't alive in the '80s.
Risks: WiiMote was a success? If it was that great, why did they have to make a new attachment? That's right, it's got some of the crappiest responses I've ever seen. I turn my controller around until my wrist cracks, and it doesn't detect it.
Or PS3 wand.beehdaubs said:Yes, Nintendo most certainly did make good games back in the day. They had the best console around. Nowadays, not so much. The Wii? Poor excuse for a system. If Nintendo just stuck with their Gamecube formula and made quirky but fun games without the use of WAGGLAN, than I would still respect them as a company. And like Jak said, if they're motion control was so perfect, than why is an extra peripheral being released?
Now this is a message to all gaming companies/publishers: Quit catering to casual gamers and give your true gaming fanbase something to chew on. No, I don't want Natal, or Wii Fit 2.5 deluxe running edition, or Carnival Games 3.
OH GAWD.Megamannt125 said:Or PS3 wand.beehdaubs said:Yes, Nintendo most certainly did make good games back in the day. They had the best console around. Nowadays, not so much. The Wii? Poor excuse for a system. If Nintendo just stuck with their Gamecube formula and made quirky but fun games without the use of WAGGLAN, than I would still respect them as a company. And like Jak said, if they're motion control was so perfect, than why is an extra peripheral being released?
Now this is a message to all gaming companies/publishers: Quit catering to casual gamers and give your true gaming fanbase something to chew on. No, I don't want Natal, or Wii Fit 2.5 deluxe running edition, or Carnival Games 3.
GTA VJak said:OH GAWD.Megamannt125 said:Or PS3 wand.beehdaubs said:Yes, Nintendo most certainly did make good games back in the day. They had the best console around. Nowadays, not so much. The Wii? Poor excuse for a system. If Nintendo just stuck with their Gamecube formula and made quirky but fun games without the use of WAGGLAN, than I would still respect them as a company. And like Jak said, if they're motion control was so perfect, than why is an extra peripheral being released?
Now this is a message to all gaming companies/publishers: Quit catering to casual gamers and give your true gaming fanbase something to chew on. No, I don't want Natal, or Wii Fit 2.5 deluxe running edition, or Carnival Games 3.
Sony, please don't go motion control. I like pressing buttons, not struggling with gimmicks.
Oh Lord.Megamannt125 said:GTA VJak said:OH GAWD.Megamannt125 said:Or PS3 wand.beehdaubs said:Yes, Nintendo most certainly did make good games back in the day. They had the best console around. Nowadays, not so much. The Wii? Poor excuse for a system. If Nintendo just stuck with their Gamecube formula and made quirky but fun games without the use of WAGGLAN, than I would still respect them as a company. And like Jak said, if they're motion control was so perfect, than why is an extra peripheral being released?
Now this is a message to all gaming companies/publishers: Quit catering to casual gamers and give your true gaming fanbase something to chew on. No, I don't want Natal, or Wii Fit 2.5 deluxe running edition, or Carnival Games 3.
Sony, please don't go motion control. I like pressing buttons, not struggling with gimmicks.
WAGGLE TO RUN OVER PROSTITUTES.
Seriously. It makes me sick to my stomach when Sony and Microsoft try to appeal to casuals. Nintendo's already dead, but hopefully the other two don't go down the same road in search of quick cash.beehdaubs said:Yes, Nintendo most certainly did make good games back in the day. They had the best console around. Nowadays, not so much. The Wii? Poor excuse for a system. If Nintendo just stuck with their Gamecube formula and made quirky but fun games without the use of WAGGLAN, than I would still respect them as a company. And like Jak said, if they're motion control was so perfect, than why is an extra peripheral being released?
Now this is a message to all gaming companies/publishers: Quit catering to casual gamers and give your true gaming fanbase something to chew on. No, I don't want Natal, or Wii Fit 2.5 deluxe running edition, or Carnival Games 3.
Exactly. MASTER RACE IN DA HOUSE, BRO.Pear said:Seriously. It makes me sick to my stomach when Sony and Microsoft try to appeal to casuals. Nintendo's already dead, but hopefully the other two don't go down the same road in search of quick cash.beehdaubs said:Yes, Nintendo most certainly did make good games back in the day. They had the best console around. Nowadays, not so much. The Wii? Poor excuse for a system. If Nintendo just stuck with their Gamecube formula and made quirky but fun games without the use of WAGGLAN, than I would still respect them as a company. And like Jak said, if they're motion control was so perfect, than why is an extra peripheral being released?
Now this is a message to all gaming companies/publishers: Quit catering to casual gamers and give your true gaming fanbase something to chew on. No, I don't want Natal, or Wii Fit 2.5 deluxe running edition, or Carnival Games 3.
Which leads me to my next point: Go PC gaming and you never have to worry about casuals. Computers are too complicated to upgrade and maintain for 78 year old gramma and my 11 year old sister, leaving no market for casuals. Hell yeah.![]()
But I wanna play Wii Sports version 5!beehdaubs said:Exactly. MASTER RACE IN DA HOUSE, BRO.Pear said:Seriously. It makes me sick to my stomach when Sony and Microsoft try to appeal to casuals. Nintendo's already dead, but hopefully the other two don't go down the same road in search of quick cash.beehdaubs said:Yes, Nintendo most certainly did make good games back in the day. They had the best console around. Nowadays, not so much. The Wii? Poor excuse for a system. If Nintendo just stuck with their Gamecube formula and made quirky but fun games without the use of WAGGLAN, than I would still respect them as a company. And like Jak said, if they're motion control was so perfect, than why is an extra peripheral being released?
Now this is a message to all gaming companies/publishers: Quit catering to casual gamers and give your true gaming fanbase something to chew on. No, I don't want Natal, or Wii Fit 2.5 deluxe running edition, or Carnival Games 3.
Which leads me to my next point: Go PC gaming and you never have to worry about casuals. Computers are too complicated to upgrade and maintain for 78 year old gramma and my 11 year old sister, leaving no market for casuals. Hell yeah.![]()
Also, there is a reason why pretty much all of the PS3/360/PC games never make it to Wii. Great games such as GTA IV, Battlefield Bad Company 2, Bioshock, Mirrors Edge, Fallout 3, Oblivion, Orange Box, Left 4 Dead, and Far Cry 2. Wii has such a pitiful variety of games when compared to other consoles.