Recent content by BetsySundrop

Ok i really have to address this clearly. No, this was not what i said or implied. I actually specified that the content in question could possibly be found within those threads, not that those threads in and of themselves were sexual content. I had said way earlier that i did not think...

I feel like nobody is actually reading my posts. Why do you keep leaving off the /preferences aspect? In discussion of identity/preferences, it can be a natural part of the conversation to discuss why/ why not attraction occurs, what motivates the attraction, the physical aspects vs other...

I think my post was pretty clear, but I'll expand on it. People are missing the /preferences. In discussing identity/ preferences, it is a natural flow of the discussion for people to sometimes be somewhat specific about what they are attracted to, which is why I linked /preferences. Sometimes...

Same for all categories. If i were to discuss my sexual attractions toward men, of course that falls under sexual content by its definition. I answered a question saying I thought sexual content was too broad to be the rule, and that's the specific example i gave. There are way more things...

Google definition of sexual content is anything related to sex. Anything. From suggestive humour, to any sex-related topic, all the way up to sexual acts. If you were to prohibit all sexual content, that's not good imo, because basic discussions of preferences fall under the very broad...

Are you serious? I don't think you read my entire posts. Sexual content is everything regarding sex. It's huge and covers the entire spectrum of any and all aspects of sex. I was asked what i thought was ok on the forum, and i specifically say we should keep identity/ preference discussions...

So currently, it's pretty subjective. A lot is left up to staff to decide. I figured one way to fix it is to be more specific in the rules.

Exactly! I was asked what was ok imo, so just looking at the entire topic, my fear is that if all sexual content is prohibited, that covers a lot of things that most people are fine with and just imo wouldn't be good for the forum to prohibit at all. It's tricky when making rules. If you can...

You asked what i thought was ok on the forum. I'll try to clarify - sorry for being unclear. Sexual materials - not ok. The google definition of sexual materials is different from sexual content. The rules say sexual materials are prohibited. Chris's posts do not fit the google definition...

So when I Google the definition of sexual materials, it's yes, pretty clear. The main point being the intent of the material. Imo, what Chris posted didn't seem to fit that definition. Determining whether content fits that definition could be subjective, in which case, the ultimate decision...

I think staff would be better at putting in the limits. But just as examples of things people may/ may not agree on- Explicit jokes, jokes with sexual references Personal preferences re sexual partners Philosophical discussions regarding sexual behavior and religion Personally, i think...

Agree! 'Materials' isn't clearly defined, I think. It's a really broad subject. I think seeing numerous posts of this type of thing throughout the forum indicates that it isn't clearly defined. I'm just saying it needs to be made clear what is/is not acceptable. I've tried to keep my...

There is a good deal of sexual content on this forum posted by members also. The main points I've been trying to make- - sexual content appears in this forum posted by staff and members alike - the current rules are unclear on what is allowed/not allowed re such content discussions -...

A question was specifically directed toward me. Agree! I would never dare to claim to respond for Chris. I'm only giving my own feedback. I have never, ever claimed to be responding for anyone, let alone Chris, and have stated that in posts. I'm responding to people who quote me, ask...