My question on the bathroom laws
- Thread starter Alolan_Apples
- Start date
Thanks for answering the main question. That's all I needed to know.
visibleghost
ʕ •̀ o •́ ʔ
i think it kinda started w banning burqas and niqabs bc they cover so much of the face n whatever. and then ppl kinda took it friom there bc they hate islam. there are a lot of things that are said to support the ban of hijabs (sexism, religious propaganda and whatever) but i think the "real" reason ppl support it is because they dont like islam and muslims. there are a lot of problems with things but there are other solutions to them, banning hijabs isn't a solution. it's restricting mulim women's right to exist in public as the people they are :/
idk if this is too iff topic but hhhh i think it's a bit related
I have other things to point out.
When the government of one state or a country passes a law, there's always going to be rebels. The more strict the law is and/or the harsher the consequences are, the more rebels there will be. And we all know that rebellion is different to defiance because rebels break the law mainly to show their opposition to the law. So if transgender people are forced to use bathrooms of their biological sex, people of both genders will use the opposite restroom as a protest. I understand that they are doing this to keep peeping toms and pedophiles out, but by doing this, they're also keeping transgender people out. Also, criminals are still going to break the law no matter what.
When the government of one state or a country passes a law, there's always going to be rebels. The more strict the law is and/or the harsher the consequences are, the more rebels there will be. And we all know that rebellion is different to defiance because rebels break the law mainly to show their opposition to the law. So if transgender people are forced to use bathrooms of their biological sex, people of both genders will use the opposite restroom as a protest. I understand that they are doing this to keep peeping toms and pedophiles out, but by doing this, they're also keeping transgender people out. Also, criminals are still going to break the law no matter what.
KaydeeKrunk
The Late Great Turt
Exactly. That's why gender neutral bathrooms are really the only way to solve anything, people will intentionally exploit the laws anyways. Creeps/*******s will see a trans female using the female restroom and think "well if that dude can do it!" And sure there will be people doing it in a supportive manner if the laws did pass disallowing them from using the proper bathroom. But honestly unless they have some guard at the front of the bathroom checking ID's for your gender or something there isn't much anybody can do about it unless some jerk reports you for it? But honestly just let people use the restroom they're comfortable using?
I was reading about the bathroom bill going on in Texas. It turns out Joe Straus is our friend. He is a Republican that opposes the bathroom bill no matter what (even though he is more concerned about the economy). But Dan Patrick, he's not a nice guy. He supports the bill, even if it were a lot stricter. I may be far right on the social issues (especially political correctness), but not on the LGBT issues.
Another thing I was reading about is the issues in the recent special session. The bathroom bill is one of them, which I oppose. Another law they want to pass is a regulation that can confiscate medical licenses from doctors that perform abortions unless if the reason was an emergency reason, which the law is violating the Supreme Court case Roe v Wade. Now that I am in support of. I also saw something about retired teachers' benefits or something. I'm kinda neutral on education issues like that.
Another thing I was reading about is the issues in the recent special session. The bathroom bill is one of them, which I oppose. Another law they want to pass is a regulation that can confiscate medical licenses from doctors that perform abortions unless if the reason was an emergency reason, which the law is violating the Supreme Court case Roe v Wade. Now that I am in support of. I also saw something about retired teachers' benefits or something. I'm kinda neutral on education issues like that.
